Advertisement

Violations, Opportunities and Power along the Jordan River: Security Studies Theory Applied to Water Conflict

  • Mark Zeitoun

Abstract

This chapter examines the applicability of recent developments in the field of security studies to water conflict issues in the Jordan River basin. Neumann’s contribution to the Copenhagen School of security studies, particularly the concept of the ‘violization’ of politics, is discussed alongside Warner’s contribution of the concept of ‘opportunitization’. Both concepts incorporation of the insight garnered through consideration of the guiding rationale of the state and non-state actors. It is shown that a combination of these concepts results in an expanded security continuum (non-politicized — politicized — securitzed/opportunitized — violated) that is directly relevant to the analysis of water conflict issues between Palestine and Israel. Warner identifies the prime concerns, goals and power of actors in different security sectors to develop the concept of ‘security sector goals’.

Two case studies from 2002 are considered: the water infrastructure damages in the West Bank and the Wazzani River dispute between Lebanon and Israel. Dynamics revealed by the application of the theory include a split on positions between actors normally considered aligned on one side of a conflict (for example between sub-national level Palestinian water professionals and their national level representatives); the ability of governments to obscure or enhance water conflict issues to suit other unrelated political interests; the varying position that a conflictual issue can take along the security continuum in relation to time and circumstance and, perhaps most notably, the effect of power asymmetries between competing actors active in issues that have become violated.

Keywords

security conflict water violization opportunitization Palestine Israel Jordan River 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalto, P., 2000: “The Saviour and Other Europes — Identity, Interests and Geopolitical Images of Europe in Estonia”, Paper given at the ISA 2000 conference, Los Angeles, 14–18 March, 2000; see at: <http:www.isanet.org/archive/aalto.doc>.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, J.A., 2001: The Middle East Water Question — Hydropolitics and the Global Economy (London: I.B. Taurus).Google Scholar
  3. Aradau, C., 2001a: “Beyond Good and Evil: Ethics and Securitization/Desecuritization Techniques”, in: Rubikon EJournal, December 2001; at: <http://venus.ci.uw.edu.pl/~rubikon/forum/claudia2.htm02/02/2004.Google Scholar
  4. Aradau, C., 2001b: “Migration: The Spiral of (In)Security”, in: Rubikon E-Journal, March 2001; at: <http://venus.ci.uw.edu.pl/~rubikon/forum/claudia1.htm02/02/2004>.Google Scholar
  5. Benvenisti, E., 2002: Sharing Transboundary Resources — International Law and Optimal Resource Use (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Buzan, B.; Waever, O.; de Wilde, J. 1998: Security — A New Framework for Analysis (London: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  7. EWOC, 2002: Water and Wastewater Situation in the West Bank Governorates During and Following the IDF Reoccupation March, April 2002 — Draft Interim Report (Jerusalem: Emergency Water Operations Center (UNDP, USAID, Oxfam), June).Google Scholar
  8. Ha’aretz, 2002: “Sharon Warns Against Diversion of Water Sources in Lebanon”, in: Ha’aretz Newspapter, 11 September.Google Scholar
  9. Hourani, A., 1991: A History of the Arab Peoples (New York: Warner Books).Google Scholar
  10. IMFA, 2002: “Cabinet Communique — 13 October, 2002” (Jerusalem: Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs Cabinet Secretariat communique, 13 October).Google Scholar
  11. IMG, 2004: IMG Damage Assessment and Reconstruction Management in the West Bank and Gaza Strip Database. International Management Group, European Commission Representative Office in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, at: <http://www.ecwbg.info/first.asp>.Google Scholar
  12. Jäkerskog, A., 2003: Why States Cooperate Over Shared Water: The Water Negotiations in the Jordan River Basin (Linkoping: Linkoping University).Google Scholar
  13. Khan, Mushtaq (2004) “Evaluating the emerging Palestinian state: ‘Good governance’ versus ‘transformation potential’”, in: Khan, M.,: State Formation in Palestine: Viability and governance during a social transformation. (London: RoutledgeCurzon).Google Scholar
  14. Lowi, M., 1993: Water and Power — The Politics of a Scarce Resource in the Jordan River Basin, (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Luft, G., 2002: “The Wazzani River Dipute: More Tension Along the Israel-Lebanon Border”, in: Peace Watch, No. 397, 20 September, at: <http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/watch/peacewatch/peacewatch2002/397.htm>.Google Scholar
  16. Mason, S.; Bichsel, C.: Hagmann, T., 2003: “Trickling-Down or Spilling-Over?” Exploring the links between international and sub-national water conflicts in the Eastern Nile and Syr Daria Basins”, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops Edinburgh, Workshop 9: “Geography, Conflict and Cooperation”, 28 March–2 April.Google Scholar
  17. Medzini, A., 2001: The River Jordan: Frontiers and Water (London: School of Oriental and African Studies).Google Scholar
  18. Neumann, Iver B., 1998: “Identity and the Outbreak of War: or Why the Copenhagen School of Security Studies Should Include the Idea of ‘Violisation’ in its Framework of Analysis”, in: International Journal of Peace Studies, 3,1 (January): 1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Newman, D., 2002: “The Wazzani and Our Water Problem”, in: The Jerusalem Post, 18 September.Google Scholar
  20. New York Times, 2002: “In Israel and Lebanon, Talk of War Over Water”, in: New York Times, 10 October.Google Scholar
  21. Ostrauskaite, R., 2001: “Environmental Security as an Ambiguous Symbol: Can We Securitize the Environment”, in: Rubikon E-Journal, December; at: <http://venus.ci.uw.edu.pl/~rubikon/forum/rasa2.htm02/02/2004>.Google Scholar
  22. Ringmar, Erik, 1996: Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Involvement in the Thirty Years’ War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  23. Selby, J., 2003: Water, Power and Politics in the Middle East — The Other Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, (London: I.B. Taurus)Google Scholar
  24. Sherman, M., 1999: The Politics of Water in the Middle East — An Israeli Perspective on the Hydro-Political Aspects of the Conflict (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  25. Warner, J., 2003: Images of Water Security: a More Integrated Perspective (Middlesex University, Flood Hazard Research Centre).Google Scholar
  26. Warner, J., 2000: “Plugging the GAP — Working with Buzan: the Ilisu Dam as a Security Issue”, Paper presented at McGill University, Montreal, Canada, April.Google Scholar
  27. World Bank, 2003: 27 Months of Intifada, Closures and Palestinian Economic Crisis (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, May).Google Scholar
  28. Zisser, E., 2002: “Israel and Lebanon: The Battle for the Wazzani”, in: Heller, M. (Ed.): Tel Aviv Notes — An Update on Political and Strategic Developments in the Middle East, No. 50 (Tel Aviv University, Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Easter and African Studies, Jafee Center for Strategic Studies, October); at: <www.tau.ac.il./jcss/>.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Zeitoun
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s CollegeLondon

Personalised recommendations