Abstract
Analogue to the more familiar notion of coding conventions, modeling conventions attempt to ensure uniformity and prevent common modeling defects. While it has been shown that modeling conventions can decrease defect density, it is currently unclear whether this decreased defect density results in higher model quality, i.e., whether models created with modeling conventions exhibit higher fitness for purpose.
In a controlled experiment with 27 master-level computer science students, we evaluated quality differences between UML analysis and design models created with and without modeling conventions. We were unable to discern significant differences w.r.t. the clarity, completeness and validity of the information the model is meant to represent.
We interpret our findings as an indication that modeling conventions should guide the analyst in identifying what information to model, as well as how to model it, lest their effectiveness be limited to optimizing merely syntactic quality.
A replication package is provided at http://www.lore.ua.ac.be/Research/Artefacts
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Effects of defects in UML models - an experimental investigation. In: ICSE ’06: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 401–411 (2006)
Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V., Muskens, J.: In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Softw. 23(2), 40–46 (2006)
Lange, C.F.J., Du Bois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S.: Experimentally investigating the effectiveness and effort of modeling conventions for the UML. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 27–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Du Bois, B., Lange, C.F.J., Demeyer, S., Chaudron, M.R.V.: A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Lindland, O I, Sindre, G., Solvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
Krogstie, J.: Conceptual Modeling for Computerized Information Systems Support in Organizations. PhD thesis, University of Trondheim, Norway (1995)
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Friday, November 10, 2006 at 5:06 pm. Houghton Mifflin (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Du Bois, B., Lange, C.F.J., Demeyer, S., Chaudron, M.R.V. (2007). A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Kühne, T. (eds) Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4364. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69488-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69489-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)