Skip to main content

A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNPSE,volume 4364)

Abstract

Analogue to the more familiar notion of coding conventions, modeling conventions attempt to ensure uniformity and prevent common modeling defects. While it has been shown that modeling conventions can decrease defect density, it is currently unclear whether this decreased defect density results in higher model quality, i.e., whether models created with modeling conventions exhibit higher fitness for purpose.

In a controlled experiment with 27 master-level computer science students, we evaluated quality differences between UML analysis and design models created with and without modeling conventions. We were unable to discern significant differences w.r.t. the clarity, completeness and validity of the information the model is meant to represent.

We interpret our findings as an indication that modeling conventions should guide the analyst in identifying what information to model, as well as how to model it, lest their effectiveness be limited to optimizing merely syntactic quality.

A replication package is provided at http://www.lore.ua.ac.be/Research/Artefacts

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_12
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-540-69489-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V.: Effects of defects in UML models - an experimental investigation. In: ICSE ’06: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 401–411 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V., Muskens, J.: In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Softw. 23(2), 40–46 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Lange, C.F.J., Du Bois, B., Chaudron, M.R.V., Demeyer, S.: Experimentally investigating the effectiveness and effort of modeling conventions for the UML. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 27–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Du Bois, B., Lange, C.F.J., Demeyer, S., Chaudron, M.R.V.: A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lindland, O I, Sindre, G., Solvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11(2), 42–49 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Krogstie, J.: Conceptual Modeling for Computerized Information Systems Support in Organizations. PhD thesis, University of Trondheim, Norway (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Friday, November 10, 2006 at 5:06 pm. Houghton Mifflin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Du Bois, B., Lange, C.F.J., Demeyer, S., Chaudron, M.R.V. (2007). A Qualitative Investigation of UML Modeling Conventions. In: Kühne, T. (eds) Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4364. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69488-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69489-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)