Skip to main content

Anorectal Manometry

  • Chapter
Anorectal and Colonic Diseases

Abstract

Anorectal pressure assessment with the aid of manometry has become important in the diagnosis and management of defaecatory disorders. Although it is quite widely used, there are several different manometry catheters and manometry systems in use, and there are really no industry standards. While manometry techniques are almost universal, the variety of systems and catheters in use means that each laboratory has to develop its own normal values, rendering interlaboratory comparison very difficult. Manometry can be used to assess resting anal pressures, squeeze pressures, the length of the high-pressure zone, the presence or absence of an anorectal reflex, and rectal pressures and anal pressures as a response to rectal filling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simpson RR, Kennedy ML, Nguyen MH, Dinning PG, Lubowski DZ (2006) Anal manometry: a comparison of techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1033–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS (2006) A new method of assessing anal sphincter integrity using inverted vectormanometry. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Gastroenterological Association (1999) Medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:732–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers J, Laurberg S, Misiewicz JJ, Henry MM, Swash M (1989) Anorectal physiology validated, a repeatability study of the motor and sensory test of anorectal function. Br J Surg 76:607–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallan RI, Marzouk DEMM, Waldron DJ, Womak NR, Williams NS (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:973–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McHugh SM, Diament NE (1987) Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique. Gut 28:1234–1241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loening-Baucke V, Anuras S (1985) Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 80:50–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McHugh SM, Diament NE, (1987) Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures. Contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 32:726–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS (2002) Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:928–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar D, Waldron D, Williams NS, Browning C, Hutton, MR, Wingate DL (1990) Prolonged anorectal manometry and external sphincter electromyography in ambulant human subjects. Dig Dis Sci 35:641–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrara A, Pemberton JH, Grotz RL, Hanson RB (1994) Prolong ambulatory recording of anorectal motility in patients slow transit constipation. Am J Surg 167:73–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrara A, Pemberton JH, Levin KE, Hanson RB (1993) Relationship between anal canal tone and rectal motor activity. Dis Colon Rectum 36:337–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meunier PD (1991) Anorectal Manometry. A collective international experience. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 15:697–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sorenson M, Ramussen O, Tetzscher T (1992) Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 19:1106–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao GN, Drew PJ, Monson JRT, Duthie GS (1997) Physiology of rectal sensations. A mathematical approach. Dis Colon Rectum 40:298–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao GN, Drew PJ, Monson JRT, Duthie GS (1997) Incremental elastic modules – a challenge to compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:33–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC (1992) Anismus – The cause of constipation and results of surgery and defecography. World J Surg 16:831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duthie, G., Gardiner, A. (2010). Anorectal Manometry. In: Givel, JC., Mortensen, N., Roche, B. (eds) Anorectal and Colonic Diseases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69419-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69419-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69418-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69419-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics