Power Density Spectra of the Velocity Waveforms in Artificial Heart Valves

  • A. A. Sakhaeimanesh
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 20)


To find the possible frequencies induced by the vibration of the flexible membrane of the Jellyfish valve, power density spectra of the the valvular velocity waveforms were carried out.

Most of the spectral energy was contained in frequencies lower than 11 Hz and all spectra exhibited pronounced peaks which implied wave motions in the preferred frequency range.

Two distinct peak frequencies, 1.2 and 2.4 Hz, were observed downstream of the Jellyfish valve which qualified as the frequencies of fundamental harmony of the waveform velocity and one of its sub harmonics.

Effect of oscillation on elevating turbulent shear stresses through the jellyfish and St. Vincent valves has also been investigated. Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) was employed to determine the velocity and shear stress distributions at various locations downstream of the valves. Comparison between two valves revealed that at 0.5D downstream of the valves the magnitude of shear stresses in the Jellyfish valve were much higher than those of the St. Vincent valve at cardiac outputs of 4, 5.5 and 7 l/min.

The cause of high shear stresses in close proximity to the Jellyfish valve could be attributed to the oscillation of the membrane which in turn generated a wake downstream of the valve (in the core of valve chamber) and produced a wide region of disturbance further downstream. This resulted in further pressure drag and consequently, higher pressure drops across the valve and higher shear stresses downstream of the valve.


Power density spectra Heart valves shear stresses oscillation LDA technique 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hanle D.D., Harrison E.C,. Yoganathan, A.P, et al. (1989)., In vitro flow dynamics of four prosthetic valves, a comparative analysis, J. Biomechanics, 22: 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reul H., Van Son Jaques A.M, et al. (1993), In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses-St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, Modified Edwards-Durmedics and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. J of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 106: 412–420.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoganathan A.P. (1995) Cardiac Valve prostheses, In: J.D. Bronzino (ed), The Biomedical Engineering Handbook (CRC and IEEE presses, 1847–1870).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruel H. (1983), In vitro evaluation of artificial heart valves,. In: D.N. Ghista, O. Hamilton, (eds). Advance in Cardiovascular physics (Basel New York, Karger, 5)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shim H.S., Lenker J. A. (1988) Heart valve prostheses, In: Webster J.G., (ed), Encyclopedia of Medical device and instrumentation (John Wiley and sons, Inc., 3: 1457–1473)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakhaeimanesh A.A., Morsi Y.S. (1999) Analysis of regurgitation, mean systolic pressure drops and energy losses for two artificial aortic valves. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 23(2): 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morsi Y. S., Sakhaeimanesh A. A (2000) Flow characteristics past jellyfish and St. Vincent valves in the aortic position under physiological pulsatile flow conditions. Artificial Organs, Volume 24(7): 564–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bluestein D, Einav S (1994) A modified stability diagram of pulsatile flow through heart valves based on improved spectral estimations of LDA data, American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Laser Anemometry, Advance and Application, Volume 191: 125–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Sakhaeimanesh
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering Group, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations