Skip to main content

Institutions and Development

  • Chapter

Developed countries are the exception, not the rule. Billions of dollars of aid and countless hours of advice notwithstanding, most countries have not been able to foster sustained growth and social progress. Increasingly research has shown that weak, missing or perverse institutions are the roots of underdevelopment. Other explanations for development, such as investment, technological innovation, or years of schooling are not correlated with higher rates of economic growth (Easterly 2002). Instead, cross-country regressions persistently demonstrate large and statistically significant correlations between institutional variables and growth, and in horse races between variables, an index of institutional quality “trumps” geography or trade as an explanation for growth (Rodrik, et al. 2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001a. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”. MIT Working Paper #01-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001b. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemida, Heitor and Daniel Ferreira. 2002. “Democracy and the Variability of Economic Performance”. Economics and Politics 14(3): 225-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, Janine. 2000. “Growth and Institutions, a Review of the Evidence”. The World Bank Research Observer 15(1): 465-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, Pranab K. 2000. “Understanding Underdevelopment: Challenges for Institutional Economics from the Point of View of Poor Countries”. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) 156(1): 216-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert J. 1996. “Democracy and Growth”. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 1-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert H. 2001. Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, Daniel, Katharina Pistor, and Jean Francois Richard. 2002. “Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect”. European Economic Review 47: 165-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A. 1997. “Political Variables in Cross-Country Growth Analysis”. Journal of Economic Surveys 11: 163-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 1977. “The Samaritan’s Dilemma” in James M. Buchanan (ed.), Freedom in Constitutional Contract. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Careaga, Maite and Barry R. Weingast. 2000. “The Fiscal Pack with the Devil: A Positive Approach to Fiscal Federalism, Revenue Sharing, and Good Governance in Developing Countries”. Hoover Institute Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1992. “The Economic Structure of Production”. American Economic Review 82(3): 713-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbo, Vittorio. 2000. “Economic Policy Reform in Latin America” in Anne O. Krueger (ed.), Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, Carl J. 1979. “The Problem of Externality”. The Journal of Law and Economics 22:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan, J. and C.L.J. Siermann. 1995. “New Evidence on the Relationship between Democracy and Economic Growth”. Public Choice 86: 175-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2002. “Appropriate Institutions”. Paper presented at the World Bank Conference on Appropriate Institutions for Growth, Washington, September 13, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, William. 2002. The Elusive Quest for Growth. Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, Stanley L. and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 2002. “Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Economies”. Economia 3: 41-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Avner. 1993. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition”. American Economic Review 83(3): 525-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1994. “Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies”. Journal of Political Economy 102(5): 912-950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones. 1999. “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1): 83-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich August von. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, Jeffrey I. 2000. States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • J ütting, Johannes. 2003. “Institutions and Development: A Critical Review”. OECD Development Centre Technical Papers No. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, Philip. 2001. “When Do Special Interests Run Rampant? Disentangling the Role of Elections, Incomplete Information, and Checks and Balances in Banking Crises”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper #2543.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2002. “Clientelism and Credibility”. Paper Presented to the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, Philip and Mary M. Shirley. 2000. “Formal Versus Informal Institutions in Economic Development” in Claude Menard (ed.), Institutions, Contracts, and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 88-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. 1997. “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1251-1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1997. “Legal Determinants of External Finance”. Journal of Finance 52: 1131-1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———.1998. “Law and Finance”. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1999. “The Quality of Government”. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (1): 222-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, David S. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Others Are So Poor. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Brian and Pablo T. Spiller. 1994. Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment : Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Bertin, Uwe Mummert, Peter Murrell, and Paul Seabright. 2002. The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, Claude. 1995. “Markets as Institutions Versus Organizations as Markets? Disentangling Some Fundamental Concepts”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28: 161-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, Paul, Douglass North, and Barry R. Weingast. 1990. “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs”. Economics and Politics 2: 1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minier, J.A. 1998. “Democracy and Growth: Alternative Approaches”. Journal of Economic Growth 3: 241-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1994. “The Historical Evolution of Polities”. International Review of Law and Economics 14: 381-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2004. “Understanding the Process of Economic Change,” Unpublished Manuscript. North, Douglass C. and Robert Paul Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England”. The Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, Jeffrey B. and James A. Robinson. 2002. “Are Endowments Fate?” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 3206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1999. “Coping with Tragedies of the Commons”. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, Clark Gibson, Sujai Shivakumar, and Krister Andersson. 2002. Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability: An Institutional Analysis of Development Cooperation. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. Mark, Daniel Zovatto G., Fernando Carillo Flores, and Andr és Allamand Zavala. 2002. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: The Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, Katharina, Martin Raiser, and Stanislaw Gelfer. 2000. “Law and Finance in Transition Economies”. Economics of Transition 8(2): 325-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, Lance. 1997. “Divergence Big Time”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civil Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quibria, M.G. 2002. Growth and Poverty: Lessons from the East Asian Miracle Revisited. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram G. and Luigi Zingales. 2003. “The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century”. Journal of Financial Economics 69(1): 5-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskov, Danila. 2002. “Norms in the Economic Evolution: Old Believers in the Russian Nineteenth-Century Textile Industry”. Unpublished Working Paper, St. Petersburg, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, James A. 2002. “States and Power in Africa by Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay”. Journal of Economic Literature 60(2): 510-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. 2000. “Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them”. National Bureau of Economic Resarch Working Paper 7540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2002. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development”. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper Series #3643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, Mark J. 2002. “Institutional Foundations for Securities Markets in the West”. Draft Prepared for the ASSA meetings, January 3-5, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, Richard and John Talbott. 2001. “Why Many Developing Countries Just Aren’t”. Unpublished Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. 1998. “The Political Economy of Absolutism Reconsidered” in Robert H. Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal and Barry R. Weingast (eds.), Analytical Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 64-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-I-Martin, Xavier. 2002. “The Disturbing “Rise” of Global Income Inequality”. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya Kumar. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, Mary M. (ed.). 2002. Thirsting for Efficiency: The Economics and Politics of Urban Water System Reform. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, Kenneth L. and Stanley L. Engerman. 2000. “Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 217-232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonobe, Tetsushi and Keijiro Otsuka. 2003. “Productivity Effects of Tve Privatization: The Case Study of Garment and Metal Casting Enterprises in the Greater Yangtze River Region”. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. W9621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, Pablo T. and Mariano Tommasi. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina”. Working Paper presented to the Annual Meetings of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2000, Tubingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, Jonathan. 1999. “The New Growth Evidence”. Journal of Economic Literature 37(1): 112-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert. 1988. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R. 1993. “Constitutions as Governance Structures: The Political Foundations of Secure Markets”. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) 149(1): 286-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development”. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 96: 132-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2002. “The Lens of Contract Applications to Economic Development and Reform” in The Institutional Economics Approach to Aid Effectiveness. The IRIS Center: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 1998. Assessing Aid. A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2002. World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. Washington, DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2003. World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World. Washington, DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.2004. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shirley, M.M. (2008). Institutions and Development. In: Ménard, C., Shirley, M.M. (eds) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics