Skip to main content

Property rights determine the incentives for resource use. Property rights consist of the set of formal and informal rights to use and transfer resources. Property rights range from open access to a fully specified set of private rights. By open access we mean that anyone can use the asset regardless of how their use affects the use of others. A full set of private rights consists of the following: 1) the right to use the asset in any manner that the user wishes, generally with the caveat that such use does not interfere with someone else’s property right; 2) the right to exclude others from the use of the same asset; 3) the right to derive income from the asset; 4) the right to sell the asset; and 5) the right to bequeath the asset to someone of your choice. In between open access and private property rights are a host of commons arrangements. Commons arrangements differ from open access in several respects. Under a commons arrangement only a select group is allowed access to the asset and the use rights of individuals using the asset may be circumscribed. For example, a societal group, e.g., a village, tribe or homeowner’s association, may allow its members to place cattle in a common pasture but limit the number of cattle that any member may put on the commons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, Douglas W. 2002. “The Rhino’s Horn: Incomplete Property Rights and the Optimal Value of an Asset”. Journal of Legal Studies 31: S359-S358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Thr áinn Eggertsson, and Douglass C. North (eds.). 1996. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J. and Andres Gallo. 2003. “The Erosion of Rule of Law in Argentina, 1930-1947: An Explanation of Argentina’s Economic Slide from the Top 10”. Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Working Paper in the Program on Poltical and Economic Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Gary. D. Libecap, and Bernardo Mueller. 1997. “Violence and the Development of Property Rights to Land in the Brazilian Amazon” in J.V.C. Nye, and J.N. Drobak (eds.), Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 145-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Gary. D. Libecap, and Bernardo Mueller. 1999a. “A Model of Rural Conflict: Violence and Land Reform Policy in Brazil”. Environment and Development Economics 4: 135-160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Gary. D. Libecap, and Bernardo Mueller. 1999b. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Gary. D. Libecap, and Bernardo Mueller. 2000. “Land Reform Policies: The Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2): 162-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, Lee J., Gary D. Libecap, and Robert Schnieder. 1996. “The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier”. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 12: 25-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L., and Peter J. Hill. 1975. “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West”. Journal of Law and Economics 18(1): 163-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L. and Peter J. Hill. 1990. “The Race for Property Rights”. Journal of Law and Economics 33: 177-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L. and Peter J. Hill. 2002. “Cowboys and Contracts”. Journal of Legal Studies 31: S489-S514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L. and Fred S. McChesney. 1994. “Raid or Trade? An Economic Model of Indian-White Relations”. Journal of Law and Economics 37(1): 39-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L. and Fred S. McChesney (eds.). 2003. Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. 1992. “Approximate Optimality of Aboriginal Property Rights”. Journal of Law and Economics 35: 183-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yoram. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yoram. 2002. A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights and the Scope of the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, Timothy. 1995. “Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana”. Journal of Political Economy 103: 903-937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James. M. and Gordon Tullock. 1965. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission”. The Journal of Law and Economics 2(1): 1-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost”. The Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, Hernando. 2000. Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism is Failing Outside the West & Why the Key to Its Success is Right under Our Noses. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Towards a Theory of Property Rights”. American Economic Review 57 (2): 347-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennen, R.T. 1976. “Cattlemen’s Associations and Property Rights in the American West”. Explorations in Economic History 13: 423-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, Thr áinn. 1990. Economic Behavior and Instituions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Erica. 2002. “Entitled to Work: Urban Property Rights and Labor Supply in Peru”. Working Paper, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensminger, Jean. 1995. “Changing Property Rights: Reconciling Formal and Informal Rights to Land in Africa”. 1997, The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, Gershon and David Feeny. 1991. “Land Tenure and Property Rights: Theory and Implications for Development Policy”. World Bank Economic Review 3: 135-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, David D. 2003. “Force, Threat, Negotiation: The Private Enforcement of Rights” in Anderson, Terry L. and Fred S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Croix, Sumner J. and James Roumasset. 1990. “The Evolution of Property Rights in Nineteenth-Century Hawaii”. The Journal of Economic History 50(4): 829-852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, Gary D. 1978. “Economic Variables and the Development of the Law: The Case of Western Mineral Rights”. Journal of Economic History 38(2): 399-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, Gary D. 1989. Contracting for Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap, Gary D. and Zeynep K. Hansen. 2003. “Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s”. Working Paper, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, Fred S. 2003. “Government as Definer of Property Rights: Tragedy Exiting the Commons” in Anderson, Terry L. and Fred S. McChesney (eds.), Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, Robert. 1994. “Property Rights and Tropical Deforestation”. Oxford Economic Papers 46: 750-756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migot-Adholla, Shem, Peter Hazell, Benoit Blarel, and Frank Place. 1991. “Indigenous Land Rights System in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Constraint on Productivity?” World Bank Economic Review 5: 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Milton. 2002. Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Timing of Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, Daniel. 2002. “Frontier Governance in Amazonia”. Science 295: 629-631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norlin, Kara. 2003. “Political Corruption: Theory and Evidence from the Brazilian Experience”. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. and Robert P. Thomas. 1970. “An Economic Theory of the Growth of the Western World”. The Economic History Review, Second series, XXIII(1): 1-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. and Robert P. Thomas. 1977. “The First Economic Revolution”. The Economic History Review, Second Series 30(2): 229-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Place, Frank and Peter Hazell. 1993. “Productivity Effects of Indigenous Land Tenure Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 10-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, S. and S.C. Silva. 2001. “Codigo Floretstal: Projeto S ó Passa na Comiss ão”. Estado de S ão Paulo. S ão Paulo, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Henry E. 2000. “Semicommon Property Rights and Scattering in the Open Fields”. Journal of Legal Studies XXIX(1): 131-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegner, Wallace E. 1954. Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, John. 1981. “Might Makes Right: A Theory of the Formation and Initial Distribution of Property Rights”. Economic Inquiry XIX: 38-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law”. The American Political Science Review 91(2): 245-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alston, L.J., Mueller, B. (2008). Property Rights and the State. In: Ménard, C., Shirley, M.M. (eds) Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics