Subterranean Rodents as Pests: The Case of the Pocket Gopher

  • Gary W. Witmer
  • Richard M. Engeman

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsager DE (1977) Impact of pocket gophers on the quantitative productivity of rangeland vegetation in southern Alberta: a damage assessment tool. In: Jackson W (ed) Test methods for vertebrate pest control and management materials, ASTM STP 625, Am Soc Test Mat, Philadelphia, pp 47–57Google Scholar
  2. Anthony RM, Barnes VG Jr (1984) Plot occupancy for indicating pocket gopher abundance and conifer damage. In: Kaukeinen DE (ed) Vertebrate Pest Control and Management Materials: Fourth Symposium, ASTM STP 817, Am Soc Test Mat, Philadelphia, pp 247–255Google Scholar
  3. Baker RJ, Bradley RD, McAliley LR (2003) Pocket gophers. In: Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) Wild mammals of North America. Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, pp 276–287Google Scholar
  4. Baker RO (2004) Field efficacy of Fumitoxin (55% aluminum phosphide) tablets for controlling valley pocket gophers. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 21:253–257Google Scholar
  5. Bocek B (1992) The Jasper Ridge reexcavation experiment: rates of artifact mixing by rodents. Am Antiq 57:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowerman AG, Redente EF (1998) Biointrusion of protective barriers at hazardous waste sites. J Environ Qual 27:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caid RD (1959) Taltuza investigations in Guatemala. Res Newsl (Department of Fruit, United Fruit Company, Boston) 6:15–20Google Scholar
  8. Case RM (1989) Managing damage to alfalfa caused by plains pocket gophers. Proc Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop 9:160–161Google Scholar
  9. Case RM, Jasch BA (1994) Pocket gophers. In: Hygnstrom SE, Timm RM, Larson GE (eds) Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Nebraska Cooperative Extension, Lincoln, pp B-17–B-29Google Scholar
  10. Case RM, Timm RM (1984) Economic model of pocket gopher control. Proc Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop 6:53–56Google Scholar
  11. Connolly RA, Landstrom RE (1969) Gopher damage to buried cable materials. Mater Res Stand 9:13–16Google Scholar
  12. Cummings MW, Marsh RE (1978) Vertebrate pests of citrus. The citrus industry, vol IV, Publication 4088, Univ California, Div Agr Sci, Davis, pp 237–273Google Scholar
  13. Engeman RM, Campbell DL (1999) Pocket gopher reoccupation of burrow systems following population reduction. Crop Prot 18:523–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engeman RM, Witmer GW (2000) Integrated management tactics for predicting and alleviating pocket gopher damage to conifer reforestation plantings. Integr Pest Manag Rev 5:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engeman RM, Campbell DL, Evans J (1993) A comparison of 2 activity measures for northern pocket gophers. Wildl Soc Bull 21:70–73Google Scholar
  16. Engeman RM, Anthony RM, Barnes V, Krupa HW, Evans J (1998) Double-stocking for overcoming damage to conifer seedlings by pocket gophers. Crop Prot 17:687–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engeman RM, Anthony RM, Barnes V, Krupa HW, Evans J (1999a) Evaluations of plastic mesh tubes for protecting conifer seedlings from pocket gophers in three western states. jWestern J Appl For 14:86–90Google Scholar
  18. Engeman RM, Nolte DL, Bulkin SP (1999b) Optimization of the open-hole method for assessing pocket gopher activity. Can Field Nat 113:241–244Google Scholar
  19. Fitch HS, Bentley JR (1949) Use of California annual-plant forage by range rodents. Ecology 30:306–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foster MA, Stubbendieck J (1980) Effects of the plains pocket gopher on rangeland. J Range Manag 33:74–78Google Scholar
  21. Graham RT, Kingery JL (1990) Seedling damage and mortality of conifer plantations on transitory ranges in northern and central Idaho. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 14:209–213Google Scholar
  22. Hakonson TE, Marinez JL, White GC (1982) Disturbance of low-level waste burial site cover by pocket gophers. Health Phys 42:868–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hegarty PJ (1984) Effects of the plains pocket gopher on hay meadows and irrigated alfalfa in the Nebraska sandhills. MSc Thesis, Univ Nebraska, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  24. Hegdal PL, Harbour AJ (1991) Prevention and control of animal damage to hydraulic structures. US Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (1991) Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance of serpentine annual grassland dynamics. Ecology 72:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Isaac RL (1959) Pocket gopher damage to underground telephone wire in Caddo County, Oklahoma. USDA Division of Wildlife Services, Oklahoma CityGoogle Scholar
  27. Jasch B, Case RM, Luchsinger JC (1992) Pocket gopher damage and alfalfa root structure. Proc Nebraska Acad Sci 102:28Google Scholar
  28. Keith JO, Hansen RM, Ward AL (1959) Effect of 2,4-D on abundance and foods of pocket gohers. J Wildl Manag 23:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis SR, O’Brien JM (1990) Survey of rodent and rabbit damage to alfalfa hay in Nevada. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 14:116–119Google Scholar
  30. Luce DG, Case RM, Stubbendieck JL (1981) Damage to alfalfa fields by plains pocket gopher. J Wildl Manag 45:258–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh RE (1988) Rodent problems on the North American continent. In: Prakash I (ed) Rodent pest management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  32. Marsh RE (1992) Reflections on current (1992) pocket gopher control in California. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 15:289–292Google Scholar
  33. Marsh RE (1998) One hundred years of pocket gopher traps and trapping. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 18:221–226Google Scholar
  34. Matschke GH, Sterner RT, Engeman RM, O’Brien JM (1994) Limitations of open-hole and plot occupancy indices in field efficacy studies with Townsend’s pocket gophers. Proc 15th Annual SETAC meeting, Denver, 15:245Google Scholar
  35. Nevo E (1999) Mosaic evolution of subterranean mammals: regression, progression and global convergence. Oxford Univ Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Nowak RM (1999) Mammals of the world. Johns Hopkins Univ Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  37. Pipas MJ, Matschke GH, McCann GR (2000) Evaluation of the efficacy of three types of traps for capturing pocket gophers. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 19:385–388Google Scholar
  38. Prakash I (1988) Rodent pest management. CRC Press, Inc., Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Proulx G (1997) A preliminary evaluation of four types of traps to capture northern pocket gophers. Can Field Nat 111:640–643Google Scholar
  40. Proulx G (2002) Effectiveness of trapping to control northern pocket gophers in agricultural lands in Canada. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 20:26–31Google Scholar
  41. Ramey A, McCann GR (1997) Evaluatingcable resistance to pocket gopher damage-a review. Proc Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Conf 13:107–113Google Scholar
  42. Richens VB (1967) The status and use of gophacide. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 3:118–125Google Scholar
  43. Sejkora KJ (1989) Influence of pocket gophers on water erosion and surface hydrology. Dissertation. Colorado State Univ, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  44. Singleton GR, Leirs H, Hinds LA, Zhang Z (1999) Ecologically-based management of rodent pests — re-evaluating our approach to an old problem. In: Singleton G (ed) Ecologically-based management of rodent pests. Austr Centre Intl Agricult Res, Canberra, pp 17–29Google Scholar
  45. Singleton GR, Hind LA, Krebs CJ, Spratt DM (2003) Rats, mice, and people: rodent biology and management. Austr Centre Intl Agricult Res, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  46. Smallwood KS (1999) Abating pocket gophers to regenerate forest clearcuts. Environ Conserv 26:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smallwood S, Geng S (1997) Multiscale influence of gophers on alfalfa yield and quality. Field Crops Res 49:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smallwood KS, Morrison ML (1999) Estimating burrow volume and excavation rate of pocket gophers. Southwest Nat 44:173–183Google Scholar
  49. Smallwood KS, Morrison ML, Beyea J (1998) Animal burrowing attributes affecting hazardous waste management. Environ Manag 22:831–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sullivan TP, Hogue EJ (1987) Influence of orchard floor management on vole and pocket gopher populations and damage in apple orchards. J Am Soc Hort Sci 112:972–977Google Scholar
  51. Sullivan TP, Krebs JA, Kluge HA (1987) Survey of mammal damage to tree fruit orchards in the Okanogan Valley of British Columbia. Northwest Sci 61:23–31Google Scholar
  52. Tietjen HP, Halvorson CH, Hegdal PL, Johnson AM (1967) 2,4-D herbicide, vegetation, and pocket gopher relationships, Black Mesa, Colorado. Ecology 48:634–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Timm RM (1994) Active ingredients. In: Hyngstrom S, Timm RM, Larson GE (eds) Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service, Lincoln, pp G-23–G-61Google Scholar
  54. Timm RM (2003) Devices for vertebrate pest control: are they of value? Proc Wildl Damage Manage Conf 10:152–161Google Scholar
  55. Villa Cornejo B (2000) Pocket gopher damage in sugarcane fields in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 19:358–361Google Scholar
  56. Whisson D, Villa Cornejo B (1996) The pocket gopher as a pest inMexico. Proc Vertebr Pest Conf 17:151–153Google Scholar
  57. Winsor TF, Whicker FW (1980) Pocket gophers and redistribution of plutonium in soil. Health Phys 39:257–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Witmer GW, Fall MW, Fiedler LA (1995a) Rodent control, research needs, and technology transfer. In: Bissonette J (ed) Integrating people and wildlife for a sustainable future. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 693–697Google Scholar
  59. Witmer GW, Matschke GH, Campbell DL (1995b) Field trials of pocket gopher control with cholecalciferol. Crop Prot 14:307–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Witmer GW, Sayler RD, Pipas MJ (1997) Repellent trials to reduce reforestation damage by pocket gophers, deer, and elk. In: Mason JR (ed) Repellents in wildlife management, USDA National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, pp 321–332Google Scholar
  61. Witmer GW, Marsh RE, Matschke GH (1999) Trapping considerations for the fossorial pocket gopher. In: Proulx G (ed) Mammal trapping. Alpha Wildlife Research and Management, Ltd., Sherwood Park, pp 131–139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary W. Witmer
    • 1
  • Richard M. Engeman
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research CenterFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations