Advertisement

Mamma

  • C. Perlet
  • S. H. Heywang-Köbrunner
Chapter
  • 43 Downloads
Part of the Handbuch diagnostische Radiologie book series (HDR)

Zusammenfassung

Die Untersuchung der Brust sollte neben der Bildgebung immer auch ein Patientengespräch und eine klinische Untersuchung umfassen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK et al. (1999) 14 years follow-up from the Edinburgh randomized trial of breast cancer screening. Lancet 353: 1903–1908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baines CJ, Vidmar M, McKeown G, Tibshirani R (1997) Impact of menstrual phase on false negative mammograms in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 80: 720–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW (1999) Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: Should it be done? How? JAMA 282: 1270–1280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chieci LM, Secreto G (2000) Factors of risk for breast cancer influencing post-menopausal long-term hormone replacement therapy. Tumori 86: 12–16Google Scholar
  5. Ciatto S, Rosselli-del-Turco M, Cantarzi et al. (1991) Causes of breast cancer misdiagnosis at physical examination. Neoplasma 38: 523–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Howard DH, Feinstein AR (1997) The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations. JAMA 277: 49–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fay MP, Freedman LS (1997) Meta-analyses of dietary fats and mammary neoplasms in rodent experiments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 46: 215–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Flegg KM, Rowling YJ (2000) Clinical breast examination. A contentious issue in screening for breast cancer. Aust Fam Physician 29: 343–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedrichs K (1994) Genetische Aspekte des Mammakarzinoms. Gynäkologe 27: 7–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandini S, Merzenich H, Robertson C, Boyle P (2000) Metaanalysis on breast cancer risk and diet: The role of associated micronutrients. Eur J Cancer 36: 636–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik, 2. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Maass H (1994) Mammakarzinom: Epidemiologie. Gynäkologe 27: 3–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller AB, To T, Baines CB et al. (1997) The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Update on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs 22: 37–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pathak DR, Osuch JR, He J (2000) Breast carcinoma etiology: Current knowledge and new insights into the effects of reproductive and hormonal risk factors in black and white populations. Cancer 88 [Suppl 51]: 1230–1238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reintgen D, Berman C, Cox Cet al. (1993) The anatomy of missed breast cancers. Surg Oncol 2: 65–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shapiro S (1997) Periodic screening for breast cancer: The HIP randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs 22: 27–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Smart CR, Bynre C, Smith RA et al. (1997) Twenty-year-followup of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin 47: 134–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Spratt JS (1999) Re: Variation in mammographic density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeck AL et al. (1998) Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: A study in Nijmegen. The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 52: 267–271Google Scholar
  20. Weitzel JF (1999) Genetic cancer risk assessment. Cancer [Suppli 86]: 2570–2574Google Scholar
  21. White E, Velentgas P, Mandelson MT et al. (1998) Variation in breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 906–910PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Änderung der Vereinbarung zur Strahlendiagnostik und -therapie § 135 Abs. 2 des SGB V, Anlage 3 BMV/EKV, veröffentlicht am 29.März 2002. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 99/13: A886-A890 und B738-B742Google Scholar
  23. Aichinger H, Joite-Barfuß S, Marhoff P (1990) Die Belichtungsautomatik in der Mammographie. Elektromedica 58: 61–65Google Scholar
  24. American College of Radiology (2001) Recommended specifications for new mammography equipment. Screen-film x-ray systems, image receptors and film processors. American College of Radiology, Reston/VAGoogle Scholar
  25. Anttinen J, Pamilo M, Soiva M, Roiha M (1993) Double reading of mammography screening fiilms: One radiologist or two? Clin Radiol 48: 414–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 1769–1777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM (1999) Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 6: 152–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Boyd NF, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ et al. (1993) Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study. Radiology 189: 661–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BI-RADSTM (1998) 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston/VAGoogle Scholar
  30. Dershaw DD, Eddens G, Liberman L, Deutch BM, Abramson AF (1995) Sonographic and clinical findings in women with palpable breast disease and negative mammography. Breast Dis 8: 13–17Google Scholar
  31. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH et al. (1988) Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151: 469–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH et al. (1994) Variability in radiologists interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331: 1493–1499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fajaro LL, Jackson PJ, Hunter TB (1992) Interventional procedures in diseases of the breast: Needle biopsy, pneumocystography, and galactography. Am J Radiol 158: 1231–1238Google Scholar
  34. Feig SA, Hendrick RE (1997) Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs 22: 119–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Bohner C et al. (1999) Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic. Rofo 171: 60–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Funke M, Netsch T, Breiter N et al. (1999) Computer-assisted visualisation of digital mammography images. Rofo 171: 359–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gaspard-Bakhach S, Dilhuydy MH, Bonichon F et al. (2000) ROC-analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography. J Radiol 81: 133–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ (1994) The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. ATR Am T Roentgenol 162: 33–36Google Scholar
  39. Heywang-Köbrunner SH (2001) Planungen der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes zur Qualitätssicherung der Mammographie. Radiologe 41: 352–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik, 2. Aufl. Thieme, New York StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnston K, Brown J (1999) Two view mammography at incident screens: Cost effectiveness analysis of policy options. BMJ 319: 1097–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jung H (1998) Mammographie und Strahlendosis. Rofo 169: 336–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Karssemeijer N, Veldkamp WJ, te Brake GM, Hendriks JH (1999) Reading screening mammograms with the help of neural networks. Ned Tiidschr Geneeskd 143: 2232–2236Google Scholar
  44. Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW W, Gold RH (1992) Workbook for quality mammography. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Hongkong LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Lado MJ, Tahoces PG, Mendez AJ et al. (1999) A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys 26: 1294–1305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Laquement MA, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth AB (1999) Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Surg 189: 34–40Google Scholar
  47. Law J (1997) Cancers detected and induced in mammographic screening: New screening schedules and younger women with family history. Br J Radiol 70: 62–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Leichter I, Lederman R, Bamberger P et al. (1999) The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms. Invest Radiol 34: 394–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB et al. (1998) The breast imaging reporting and data system: Positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 17: 35–40Google Scholar
  50. Linver MN, Osuch JR, Brenner RJ, Smith RA (1995) The mammography audit: A primer for the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA). AJR Am J Roentgenol 165: 19–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Perry NM, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Schouten J (eds) (2001) European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening, 3rd edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  52. Perry NM and the EUSOMA Working Party (2001) Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer 37: 159–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Hemminger BM et al. (2000) Current status of full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 7: 266–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pisano ED (2002) Current status of full-field digital mammography. Radiology 21: 26–28Google Scholar
  55. Säbel M, Aichinger U, Schulz-Wendtland R et al. (1999) Digitale Vollfeld-Mammographie: Physikalische Grundlagen und klinische Aspekte. Röntgenpraxis 52: 171–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Elmore JG et al. (2000) Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independant double interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 1257–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Thurtjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS (1994) Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191: 241–244Google Scholar
  58. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ et al. (2000) Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215: 554–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Young KC, Wallis MG, Blansky RG, Moss SM (1997) Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: Results from the NHS Breast Screnning Programme. Br J Radiol 70: 482–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Zheng B, Chang YH, Wang XH et al. (1999) Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm. Acad Radiol 6: 327–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. ACR standard for performance of the breast ultrasound examination (1998) American College of Radiology, Reston/VA 317Google Scholar
  62. Balu-Maestro C, Bruneton JN, Melina P et al. (1994) High frequency ultrasound detection of breast calcifications. Eur J Ultrasound 3: 247–252Google Scholar
  63. Buchberger W, De Koekkoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 921–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ciatto S, Roselli-Turco M, Catarzis M et al. (1994) The diagnostic role of breast echography. Radiol Med (Torino) 88: 221–224Google Scholar
  65. Dershaw DD, Eddens G, Liberman L, Deutch BM, Abramson AF (1995) Sonographic and clinical findings in women with palpable breast disease and negative mammography. Breast Dis 8: 13Google Scholar
  66. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review. Cancer 76: 626–630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Huber S. Helbich T, Kettenbach J, Dock W, Zuna I, Delorme S (1998) Effects of microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: Computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler Usearly experience. Radiology 208: 485–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening USdiagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207: 191–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kopans DB (1999) Breast-cancer screening with ultrasonography (letter). Lancet 354: 2096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Leucht D, Madjar H (1995) Lehratlas der Mammasonographie. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  71. Pamilo M, Soiva M, Anttinen J et al. (1991) Ultrasonography of breast lesions detected in mammography screening. Acta Radiol 32: 220–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Potterton AJ, Peakman DH, Young IR (1994) Ultrasound demonstration of small breast cancers detected by mammographic screening. Clin Radiol 49: 808–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196: 123–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane UP (1994) Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  75. Abraham DC, Jones RC, Jones SE et al. (1996) Evaluation of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 78: 91–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM et al. (1995) Single- and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: Prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. Radiology 197: 45–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Boné B, Aspelin P, Isberg B et al. (1995) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicon implants after cancer surgery. Acta Radiol 36: 111–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213: 881–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1998) Magnetic resonance guided localisation and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9: 44–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM et al. (1995) Ductal carcinoma in situ. MR imaging — histopathologic correlation. Radiology 196: 415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Gorczynca DP, Brenner RJ (1997) The augmented breast. Radiologic and Clinical Perspectives. Thieme, New York StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  82. Heinig A, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P et al. (1997) Wertigkeit der Kontrastmittel-Magnetresonanztomographie der Mamma bei Wiederaufbau mittels Implantat. Radiologe 37: 710–717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Hean Köbrunner SH, Beck R (1996) Contrast-enhanced Yw g ( ) MRI of the breast. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Küchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: Accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24: 94–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG et al. (2001) International investigation of breast MRI: Results of a multicenter study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters of contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiology 11: 531–546Google Scholar
  86. Ämer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K et al. (1998 a) Magnetic resonance imaging and its role in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer. Anticancer Res 18: 2163–2164Google Scholar
  87. Ämer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K et al. (1998 b) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrences in the breast cancer. Anticancer Res 18: 2159–2162Google Scholar
  88. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J et al. (1997) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic constrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203: 137–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler R, Leutner CC et al. (2000) Breast MR screening in women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer suspectibility gene: Preliminary results. Radiology 215: 267–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD et al. (1997) MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 205: 437–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhäuser K, Stoll P et al. (1997) Menstrual cycle an age: Influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 203: 145–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Spittle M et al. (1996) Breast surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. Is it necessary? Eur J Surg Oncol 22: 353–341Google Scholar
  93. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craigs MA, Davidson T et al. (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG (1997) Breast MR imaging interpretation model. Radiology 202: 833–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al. (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: Effect of MR imaging and MRguided biopsy. Radiology 196: 115–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Orel SG, Medonca MH, Reynolds C et al. (1997) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202: 413–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD (1999) Breast MR images in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212: 545–549Google Scholar
  98. Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H et al. (1997) MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. Br J Radiol 70: 452–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Schorn C, Fischer U, Luftger-Nagel S et al. (1999) MRI of the breast in patients with metastatic disease of unknown nrimarv. Eur Radiol 9: 470–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS et al. (1996) Threedimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 201: 427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Stoutjesdijk MH, Boetes C, Van Die LE et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer screening of patients from high risk populations: Results of a prospective pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1095–1102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Bartels CC, Obdejin AJ, Oudkerk M (2000) Earlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familiar risk. Eur J Cancer 36: 514–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D et al. (1998) Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast conservative therapy. MAGMA 7: 141–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Köbrunner SH (2000) In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: Morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MRI. MAGMA 11: 311–314Google Scholar
  105. Khalkhali I, Villanueva-Meyer J, Edell SL et al. (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m-Sestamibi breast imaging in breast cancer detection (abstr.). J Nucl Med 37: 74PGoogle Scholar
  106. Klaus AJ, Klingensmith WC 3rd, Parker SH et al. (2000) Comparative value of 99mTc-Sestamibi scintimammography and sonography in the diagnostic workup of breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 1779–1783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Palmedo H, Biersack HJ, Lastoria S et al. (1998) Scintimammography with technetium-99m methooxyisobutylisonitrile: Results of a prospective European multicenter trial. Eur J Nucl Med 25: 375–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Prats E, Carril J, Herranz R et al. (1998) A Spanish multicenter scintigraphic study of the breast using Tc 99m MIBI. Report of results. Rev Esp Med Nucl 17: 338–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (1998) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP 28: 1–126Google Scholar
  110. Scheidhauer K, Scharl A., Pietrzyk U et al. (1996) Qualitative (18F) FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: Clinical relevance and practicability. Eur J Nucl Med 23: 618–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Schelling M, Avril N, Nahring J et al. (2000) Positron emission tomography using ((18)F) Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 18: 1689–1695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Scopinaro F, Schillaci O, Ussof W et al. (1997) A three center study on diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography. Anticancer Res 17: 1631–1634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Scopinaro F, Pani R, De Vincentis G et al. (1999) High-resolution scintimammography improves the accuracy of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography: Use of a new dedicated gamma camera. Eur J Nucl Med 26: 1279–1288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Tiling R, Tatsch K, Sommer H et al. (1998) Technetium-99mSestamibi scintimammography for the detection of breast carcinoma: Comparison between planar and SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med 39: 849–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Wahl RL (1998) Overview of the current status of PET in breast cancer imaging. T Nücl Med 42: 1–7Google Scholar
  116. Yutani K, Shiba E, Kusuoka H et al. (2000) Comparison of FDGPET with MIBI-SPECT in the detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24: 274–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Azavedo E, Svane G, Auer G (1989) Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non palpable lesions. Lancet 13: 1033–1036Google Scholar
  118. Breast Imaging and Intervention Standards of the American College of Radiology (1994 – 2002). American College of Radiology, Reston/VAGoogle Scholar
  119. Brem RF, Schonnjans JM, Sanow L et al. (2001) Reliability of histologic diagnosis of breast cancer with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am Surg 67: 388–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al. (1996) Percutaneous cor biopsy of the breast: Effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accurancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH et al. (2002) Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: When is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 1179–1184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Britton PD (1999) Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 8: 1–4Google Scholar
  123. Burak WE Jr, Owens KE, Tighe MB et al. (2000) Vacuumassisted stereotactic breast biopsy: Histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 135: 700–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC et al. (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: Results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175: 1341–1346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Ferzli GS, Hurwitz JB, Puza T, Van Vorst-Bilotti S (1997) Advanced breast cancer biopsy instrumentation: A critique. J Am Coll Surg 185: 145–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik, 2. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar
  127. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schaumloffel U, Viehweg P et al. (1998) Minimally invasive stereotaxic core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 8: 377–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U et al. (1999) MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy (PEIB) of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 9: 1656–1665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Pickuth D, Alberich T, Spielmann RP (2000) Interventional MRI of the breast: Lesion localisation and biopsy. Eur Radiol 10: 36–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Decker T, Böcker W (2003) Interdisciplinary consensus on the use and technique of vacuum assisted stereotactic breast biopsy. Eur J Radiol 47(3): 232–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr, Nowels KW (1998) Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: Comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171: 1325–1330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J et al. (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210: 799–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH et al. (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218: 497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH (2000) Vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy: Complications and their incidence. Can Assoc Radiol J 51: 232–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of a stereotaxically guided vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy program in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 52: 223–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Lamm RL, Jackman RJ (2000) Mammographic abnormalities caused by percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of histologically benign lesions evident on follow-up mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 753–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ et al. (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic coreneedle biopsy: Frequency of mammographic change and false negative rate. Radiology 212: 189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Liberman L (1999) Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI): Analysis of published experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 1413–1416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Liberman L, Evans WP, Dershaw DD et al. (1994) Specimen radiography of microcalcifications in stereotactic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 190: 223–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al. (1997a) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203: 151–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Liberman L, Hann LE, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP (1997b) Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy.. Radiology 203: 343–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Luini A, Zurrida S, Paganelli G et al. (1999) Comparison of radio-guided excision with wire localisation of occult breast lesions. Br J Surg 86: 522–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H et al. (1995) Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: Comparison of samples obtained with 14, 16 and 18 gauge needles. Radiology 197: 739–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. NHS Breast Screening Programme (1993) Guidelines for cytology procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening: Report by cytology sub-group of the National Coordinating Committee for Breast Screening Pathology. NHSBSP Publication N. 22: Sent. 1993Google Scholar
  145. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al. (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: A multiinstitutional study. Radiology 193: 359–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X et al. (2002) Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 12: 1463–1470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Perry NM and the EUSOMA Working Party (2001) Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. Eur J Cancer 37: 159–172Google Scholar
  148. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Rudas M, Wagner T, Memarsadeghi M, Lomoschitz F (2002) Stereotactic needle biopsy: Diagnostic reliability of various biopsy systems and needle sizes. Rofo 174: 614–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D et al. (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 683–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J et al. (1998) Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. Cancer 82: 678–688Google Scholar
  151. Rotter K, Haentschel G, Koethe D et al. (2003) Evaluation of mammographic and clinical follow-up after 728 stereotactic vacuum assisted breast biopsies. Am J Surg 186(2): 134–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Sloane JP, Amendoeira I, Apostolokas N et al. (1997) Guidelines for pathology — supplement to European guidelines on quality assurance in mammography screening. Report by the Pathology Working Group of the European Community. Pathologe 18: 71–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Zannis VJ, Aliano KM (1998) The evolving practice pattern of the breast surgeon with disappearance of open biopsy for nonpalpable lesions. Am J Surg 176: 525–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Bässler R (1978) Pathologie der Brustdrüse. Springer, Berlin er Heidelbl N w YorkGoogle Scholar
  155. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A et al. (1999) Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med 130: 262–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Beck R (1996) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  157. Kavanagh AM, Mitchell, H, Gilles GG et al. (2000) Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet 355: 270–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Kopans DB, Swann Ca, White G et al. (1989) Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 171: 639–643PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Laya MB, Gallagher JC, Schreiman JS et al. (1995) Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern. Radiology 196: 433–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH et al. (1996) Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 643–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Litherland JC, Stallard S, Hole D et al. (1999) The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the sensitivity of screening mammograms. Clin Radiol 54: 285–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Lundstrom E, Wilczek B, von Palffy Z et al. (1999) Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement therapy: Differences according to treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181: 348–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Marugg RC, van der Mooren MJ, Hendriks JH et al. (1997) Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women on hormonal replacement therapy. Eur Radiol 7: 749–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Sterns EE, Zee B (2000) Mammographic density changes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Is effect of hormone replacement therapy predictable? Breast Cancer Res Treat 59: 125–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Stomper PC, Van Vorrhis BJ, Ravnikar VA et al. (1990) Mammographic changes associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: A longitudinal study. Radiology 174: 487–490Google Scholar
  166. Azzopardi JG, Salm R (1984) Ductal adenoma of the breast: A lesion which can mimic carcinoma. J Pathol 144: 15–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Beer GM, Kompatscher P, Hergan K (1996) Diagnosis of breast tumors after breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20: 391–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Berg WA, Gilbreath PL (2000) Multicentric and multifocal cancer: Whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 214: 59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184: 613–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. Boné B, Apelin P, Isberg B et al. (1995) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone implants after cancer surgery. Acta Radiol 36: 111–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB (1999) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: Histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 1405–1407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ: Improved accuracy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiology 202: 843–848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Cardenosa G, Eklund GW (1991) Benign papillary neoplasms of the breast: Mammographic findings. Radiology 181: 751–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Thumbull LW et al. (1999) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6: 599–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Duncan KA, Needham G, Gilbert JF, Deans HE (1998) Incident round cancers: What lessons can we learn? Clin Radiol 53: 29–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Dupont WD, Page DL, Parl FF et al. (1994) Long-term risk of breast cancer in women with fibroadenoma. N Engl J Med 331: 10–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH et al. (1994) Variability in radiologists’s acute interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 331: 1493–1499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Ernster VL (1997) Epidemiology and natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ. In: Silverstein MJ (ed) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 23–33Google Scholar
  179. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Wilson AR (2001) Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Overdiagnosis or an obligate percursor of invasive disease? Med Screen 8: 149–151Google Scholar
  180. Fisher ER, Dignam J, Tan-Chiu E et al. (1999) Pathologic findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17; intraductal carcinoma. Cancer 86: 429–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213: 881–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Giess CS, Keating DM, Osborne MP, Rosenblatt R (1999) Local tumor recurrence following breast conservation therapy: Correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings. Radiology 212: 829–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM et al. (1995) Ductal carcinoma in situ. MR imaging: Histopathologic correlation. Radiology 196: 415–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Harvey JA, Fajaro LL, Innis CA (1993) Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: Retrospective versus blinded interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161: 1167–1172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Harvey JA, Moran RE, Maurer EJ, De Angelis GA (1997) Sonographic features of mammary oil cysts. J Ultrasound Med 16: 719–724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. Heinig A, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P et al. (1997) Wertigkeit der Kontrastmittel-Magnetresonanztomographie der Mamma bei Wiederaufbau mittels Implantat. Radiologe 37: 710–717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Beck R (1996) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  188. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik, 2. Aufl. Thieme, New York StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  189. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R et al. (1993) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17: 891–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  190. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Küchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: Accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24: 94–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P et al. (1998) Minimally invasive stereotactic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 8: 377–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG et al. (2001) International investigation of breast MRI: Results of a mutlicenter study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters of contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologic correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11: 531–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Holland R, Hendriks JH (1994) Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ; mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol 11: 181–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH (1990) Extent, distribution and mammographic/ histological correlations of the breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 335: 519–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. Holli K, Saaristo R, Isola J et al. (1998) Effect of radiotherapy on the interpretation of routine follow-up mammography after conservative breast surgery; a randomized study. Br J Cancer 78: 524–525Google Scholar
  196. Idvall I, Andersson C, Fallenius G et al. (2001) Histopathological and cell biological factors of ductal carcinoma in situ before and after the introduction of mammographic screening. Acta Oncol 40: 653–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgard C et al. (1992) Interval carcinomas in the Malmö mammographic screening trial: Radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159: 287–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. Ämer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K et al. (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging and its role in the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer. Anticancer Res 18: 2163–2164Google Scholar
  199. Krishnamurty R, Whitman GJ, Stelling CB, Kushwaha AC (1999) Mammographic findings after breast conservation therapy. Radiographics 19: Spec No: 553–562Google Scholar
  200. Lorenz R, Stark GB, Hedde JP (1997) The value of sonography for the discovery of complications after the implantation of silicone gel protheses for breast augmentation or reconstruction. Rofo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr 166: 233–237Google Scholar
  201. Mandrekas AD, Assimakopoulos GJ, Mastorakos DP, Pantzallis K (1994) Fat necrosis following breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 47: 560–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Meyer JE, Kopans DB (1981) Stability of a mammographic mass: A false sense of security. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137: 595–598PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. Meyer J, Timothy J. Stomper P, Sonnenfield M (1990) Biopsy of occult breast lesions: Analysis of 1261 abnormalities. JAMA 263: 2341–2343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT et al. (1994) MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants; value of a siliconeselective pulse sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163: 51–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Spittle M et al. (1996) Breast surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. Is it neccessary? Eur J Surg Oncol 22: 335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  206. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craigs MA, Davidson T et al. (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Ohuchi N, Abe R, Kasei M (1981) Possible cancerous change in intraductal papillomas of the breast: A 3D reconstruction study of 25 cases. Cancer 54: 605–611Google Scholar
  208. Orel SG, Medonca MH, Reynolds C et al. (1997) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202: 413–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  209. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD (1999) Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown Primary malignancy.. Radiology 212: 543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. Page DL, Kidd TE, Dupont WD et al. (1991) Lobular neoplasia of the breast: Higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. Hum Pathol 22: 1232–1239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  211. Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H et al. (1997) MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity. Br J Radiol 70: 452–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Rosen PP, Caicco J (1986) Florid papillomatosis of the nipple: A study of 51 patients, including nine with mammary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 10: 87–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. Rosen PP, Oberman HA (1993) Tumors of the mammary gland. Atlas of tumour pathology, 3rd ser., Fasc. 7. AFIP, Washington/DCGoogle Scholar
  214. Rosen PP, Holmes G, Lesser M et al. (1985) Juvenile papillomatosis and breast carcinoma. Cancer 55: 1345–1352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. Saarenmaa J, Salminen T, Geiger U et al. (1999) The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme. Eur J Cancer 35: 1118–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. Sapino A, Figerio A, Perterse JL, Arisio R, Coluccia C, Bussolati G (2000) Mammographically detected in situ lobular carcinomas of the breast. Virchows Arch 436: 421–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Schorn C, Fischer U, Luftner-Nagel S et al. (1999) MRI of the breast in patients with metastatic disease of unknown primary.. Eur Radio1 9: 470–473Google Scholar
  218. Schwartz GF, Solin LJ, Olivotto IA et al. (2000) Consensus conference on the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 22–25, 1999). Bull Cancer 87: 499–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. Sickles EA (1994) Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: Likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192: 439–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA et al. (1990) Medical audit of a rapid throughput mammography screening practice methodology and results of 27.114 examinations. Radiology 175: 323–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S (1999) The influence of the margin with on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. New Engl J Med 340: 1455–1461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. Skaane P (1999) The additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. A prospective study. Acta Radiol 40: 486–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. Skaane P, Sauer T (1999) Ultrasonography of malignant breast neoplasms. Analysis of carcinomas missed as tumor. Acta Radiol 40: 376–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  224. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS et al. (1996) Threedimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 201: 427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS (1998) Fat necrosis in the breast: Sonographic features. Radiology 206: 261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  226. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Van Die LE et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer screening of patients from high risk populations: Results of a prospective pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 1095–1102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. Stavros AT, Dennis MA (1993) An introduction to breast ultrasound. In: Parker SH, Jobe WE (eds) Percutaneous breast biopsy. Raven, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  228. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL et al. (1995) Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign an malignant lesions. Radiology 196: 123–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Day NE et al. (1992) Breast cancer treatment an natural history: New insights from results of screening. Lancet 339: 412–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Elmore JG et al. (2000) Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 1257–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  231. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP (1994) Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. Churchill Livingstone, EdingburghGoogle Scholar
  232. Van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (1993) The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 72: 1933–1938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  233. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Köbrunner SH (2000) In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: Morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA 11: 129–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  234. Woods ER, Helvie MA, Ikeda DM et al. (1992) Solitary breast papilloma: Comparison of mammographic, galactographic and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159: 487–491PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Perlet
  • S. H. Heywang-Köbrunner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations