Skip to main content

Predicting User Preferences Via Similarity-Based Clustering

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5032))

Abstract

This paper explores the idea of clustering partial preference relations as a means for agent prediction of users’ preferences. Due to the high number of possible outcomes in a typical scenario, such as an automated negotiation session, elicitation techniques can provide only a sparse specification of a user’s preferences. By clustering similar users together, we exploit the notion that people with common preferences over a given set of outcomes will likely have common interests over other outcomes. New preferences for a user can thus be predicted with a high degree of confidence by examining preferences of other users in the same cluster. Experiments on the MovieLens dataset show that preferences can be predicted independently with 70-80% accuracy. We also show how an error-correcting procedure can boost accuracy to as high as 98%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boutilier, C., Patrascu, R., Poupart, P., Schuurmans, D.: Regret-based utility elicitation in constraint-based decision problems. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 929–934 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buffett, S., Comeau, L., Spencer, B., Fleming, M.W.: Detecting opponent concessions in multi-issue automated negotiation. In: Proc. of ICEC 2006, Fredericton, Canada, pp. 11–18 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buffett, S., Spencer, B.: A bayesian classifier for learning opponents preferences in multi-object automated negotiation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chajewska, U., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In: AAAI 2000, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 363–369 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.: Reasoning with conditional preferences across attributes. Master’s thesis, University of New Brunswick (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S., Buffett, S., Fleming, M.W.: Reasoning with conditional preferences across attributes. In: Proc. of AI 2007, Montreal, Canada, pp. 369–380 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ha, V., Haddawy, P.: Similarity of personal preferences: Theoretical foundations and empirical analysis. Artificial Intelligence 146(2), 149–173 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Chichester (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Restificar, A., Haddawy, P.: Inferring implicit preferences from negotiation actions. In: Proc. Int’l Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics, Fort Lauderdale, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sabine Bergler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qin, M., Buffett, S., Fleming, M.W. (2008). Predicting User Preferences Via Similarity-Based Clustering. In: Bergler, S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5032. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68825-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68825-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68821-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68825-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics