Reliable Signalling Transport in Next Generation Networks

  • Enrique Vázquez
  • Manuel Álvarez-Campana
  • Alberto Hernández
  • Joan Vinyes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5031)

Abstract

Next-generation network architectures aim at the convergence of services (e.g. telephony, television, Web access, online games, and new services) over a common IP core. Additionally, the integration of wired and wireless access technologies will offer users ubiquitous access to all those services. Telecommunications networks rely on signalling protocols to perform key service control functions such as locating and authenticating users, establishing communication sessions, reserving resources, charging, etc. Signalling is crucial for network operators and so requires a transport service with very high availability and low delay. Traditionally, operators have deployed dedicated and highly redundant signalling networks following ITU-T standards. More recently, and motivated by the current evolution towards IP, the IETF has defined SIGTRAN, a new protocol suite intended to transport signalling protocols over IP. This paper addresses the problem of configuring the protocol mechanisms existing at different layers of the SIGTRAN architecture in a coordinated way, with the goal of creating a redundant network topology able to meet the stringent availability levels required for signalling in carrier-grade networks. The proposed solution is described and evaluated numerically.

Keywords

Signalling SIGTRAN IP network availability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    TU-T Recommendation Q.700: Introduction to Signalling System No. 7 (1993) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhn, P.J., Pack, C.D., Skoog, R.A.: Common channel signalling networks: past, present, future. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 12(3) (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ong, L., Rytina, I., García, M., Schwarzbauer, H., Coene, L., Lin, H., Juhasz, I., Holdrege, M., Sharp, C.: Framework Architecture for Signalling Transport. RFC 2719 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stewart, R.: Stream Control Transmission Protocol. RFC 4960 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ITU-T Recommendation Q.704: Signalling network functions and messages (1996) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-T Rec. Q.706: Message Transfer Part signalling performance (1993) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung, M.Y., You, J.U., Sung, D.K., Choi, B.D.: Performability Analysis of Common-Channel Signalling Networks Based on Signalling System #7. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 48(3) (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fu, S., Atiquzzaman, M.: SCTP: state of the art in research, products, and technical challenges. In: IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications (CCW), Dana Point, California, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morneault, K., Pastor-Balbas, J. (eds.): Signalling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA). RFC 4666 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loughney, J., Tüxen, M., Pastor-Balbas, J.: Security Considerations for Signalling Transport (SIGTRAN) Protocols. RFC 3788 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fineberg, V.: QoS Support in MPLS Networks. MPLS/FR Alliance (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan, P., Swallow, G., Atlas, A. (eds.): Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels. RFC 4090 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guénon, G., Vázquez, E., Álvarez-Campana, M.: SS7 Signalling Transport over IP. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (CMT), http://www.cmt.es
  15. 15.
    Jungmaier, A., Rathgeb, E., Tüxen, M.: On the use of SCTP in failover scenarios. In: 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI), Orlando, Florida, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grinnemo, K.-J., Brunstrom, A.: Impact of Traffic Load on SCTP Failovers in SIGTRAN. In: 4th International Conference on Networking (ICN), Reunion Island (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jungmaier, A., Rathgeb, E.: On SCTP multi-homing performance. Telecommunication Systems 31(2-3) (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noonan, J., Murphy, J., Murphy, S., Perry, P.: Stall and Path Monitoring Issues in SCTP. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2006, Barcelona, Spain (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Natarajan, P., Iyengar, J.R., Amer, P.D., Stewart, R.: SCTP: an innovative transport layer protocol for the web. In: 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, Edinburgh, Scotland (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koh, S.J., Chang, M.J., Lee, M.: mSCTP for soft handover in transport layer. IEEE Communications Letters 8(3) (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gradischnig, K.D., Tüxen, M.: Signalling transport over IP-based networks using IETF standards. In: Third International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks, DRCN 2001, Budapest, Hungary (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, H., Lee, B.: A redundancy method of AS traffic in signalling gateway using load sharing scheme. In: 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, Phoenix Park, Korea (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dreibholz, T., Rathgeb, E.P.: RSerPool - Providing Highly Available Services using Unreliable Servers. In: IEEE EuroMicro 2005, Porto, Portugal (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Vázquez
    • 1
  • Manuel Álvarez-Campana
    • 1
  • Alberto Hernández
    • 1
  • Joan Vinyes
    • 1
  1. 1.ETS Ing. TelecomunicaciónUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations