Challenges in Collaborative Modeling: A Literature Review

  • Michiel Renger
  • Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten
  • Gert-Jan de Vreede
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 10)

Abstract

Modeling is a key activity in conceptual design and system design. Users as well as stakeholders, experts and entrepreneurs need to be able to create shared understanding about a system representation. In this paper we conducted a literature review to provide an overview of studies in which collaborative modeling efforts have been conducted to give first insights in the challenges of collaborative modeling, specifically with respect to group composition, collaboration & participation methods, modeling methods and quality in collaborative modeling. We found a critical challenge in dealing with the lack of modeling skills, such as having a modeler to support the group, or create the model for the group versus training to empower participants to actively participate in the modeling effort, and another critical challenge in resolving conflicting (parts of) models and integration of submodels or models from different perspectives. The overview of challenges presented in this paper will inspire the design of methods and support systems that will ultimately advance the efficiency and effectiveness of collaborative modeling tasks.

Keywords

Collaborative modeling system analysis and design groups participation modeling methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boehm, B., Gruenbacher, P., Briggs, R.O.: Developing Groupware for Requirements Negotiation: Lessons Learned. IEEE Software 18 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fruhling, A., de Vreede, G.J.: Collaborative Usability Testing to Facilitate Stakeholder Involvement. In: Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., Grünbacher, P. (eds.) Value Based Software Engineering, pp. 201–223. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Standish Group: CHAOS Report: Application Project and Failure (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill, R.C., Levenhagen, M.: Methaphors and Mental Models: Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial Activities. Journal of Management 21, 1057–1074 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frost, Sullivan.: Meetings Around the World: The Impact of Collaboration on Business Performance. Frost & Sullivan White Papers, 1–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vennix, J.A.M., Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P., Rohrbaugh, J.: Model-building for group decision support: Issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation support. European Journal of Operational Research 59, 28–41 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Vennix, J.A.M., Mullekom, T.v.: Group Model Building Effectiveness: a Review of Assessment Studies. System Dynamics Review 18, 5–45 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P.: Scripts for Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 13, 107–129 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richardson, G.P., Andersen, D.F.: Teamwork in Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review 11, 113–137 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulder, I., Swaak, J., Kessels, J.: Assessing learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Educational Technology & Society 5, 35–47 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw, D., Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54(913), 936–948 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dean, D.L., Orwig, R.E., Vogel, D.R.: Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools. Group Decision and Negotiation 9, 109–127 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenhead, J.: Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research 127, 615–630 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Where next for Problem Structuring Methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57, 766–768 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Using Causal Mapping with Group Support Systems to Elicit an Understanding of Failure in Complex Projects: Some Implications for Organizational Research. Group Decision and Negotiation 14, 355–376 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ackermann, F., Franco, L.A., Gallupe, B., Parent, M.: GSS for Multi-Organizational Collaboration: Reflections on Process and Content. Group Decision and Negotiation 14, 307–331 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andersen, D.F., Vennix, J.A.M., Richardson, G.P., Rouwette, E.A.J.A.: Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58, 691–694 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lund, J.R., Palmer, R.N.: Water Resource System Modeling for Conflict Resolution. Water Resources Update 108, 70–82 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morton, A., Ackermann, F., Belton, V.: Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy, and key concepts. European Journal of Information Systems 12, 110–126 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dean, D.L., Lee, J.D., Orwig, R.E., Vogel, D.R.: Technological Support for Group Process Modeling. Journal of Management Information Systems 11, 43–63 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dennis, A.R., Hayes, G.S., Daniels Jr., R.M.: Re-engineering Business Process Modeling. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dennis, A.R., Hayes, G.S., Daniels Jr., R.M.: Business process modeling with group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 15, 115–142 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gurung, T.R., Bousquet, F., Trébuil, G.: Companion Modeling, Conflict Resolution, and Institution Building: Sharing Irrigation Water in the Lingmuteychu Watershed, Bhutan. Ecology and Society 11 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trauth, E.M., Jessup, L.M.: Understanding Computer-mediated Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System Use. MIS Quarterly 24, 43–79 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nunamaker, J.F., Alan, R.D., Joseph, S.V., Douglas, V., Joey, F.G.: Electronic meeting systems to support group work, vol. 34, pp. 40–61. ACM, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kolfschoten, G.L., Niederman, F., Vreede, G.J.d., Briggs, R.O.: Roles in Collaboration Support and the Effect on Sustained Collaboration Support. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Waikoloa (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vreede, G.J.d., Boonstra, J., Niederman, F.A.: What is Effective GSS Facilitation? A Qualitative Inquiry into Participants’ Perceptions. In: Hawaiian International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H., Vandenberg, R.J.: Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems Via Meta-Analysis. Management Information Systems Quarterly 25, 167–183 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Griffith, T.L., Fuller, M.A., Northcraft, G.B.: Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems. Information Systems Research 9, 20–36 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    den Hengst, M., de Vreede, G.J.: Collaborate Business Process Engineering: A Decade of Lessons from the Field. Journal of Management Information Systems 20, 85–113 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Vennix, J.A.M., Thijssen, C.M.: Group Model Building: A Decision Room Approach. Simulation & Gaming 31, 359–379 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van den Belt, M.: Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Island Press (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vreede, G.J.d., Davison, R., Briggs, R.O.: How a Silver Bullet May Lose its Shine - Learning from Failures with Group Support Systems. Communications of the ACM 46, 96–101 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maghnouji, R., de Vreede, G., Verbraeck, A., Sol, H.: Collaborative Simulation Modeling: Experiences and Lessons Learned. In: HICSS 2001: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34), vol. 1, p. 1013. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Janis, I.L.: Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1972)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vennix, J.A.M.: Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. John Wiley & sons, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hengst, M.d.: Collaborative Modeling of Processes: What Facilitation Support does a Group Need? In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, AIS Press, Omaha (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ram, S., Ramesh, V.: Collaborative conceptual schema design: a process model and prototype system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 16, 347–371 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schümmer, T., Lukosch, S.: Patterns for Computer-Mediated Interaction. Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michiel Renger
    • 1
  • Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten
    • 1
  • Gert-Jan de Vreede
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering, Faculty of Technology Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Collaboration ScienceUniversity of Nebraska at OmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations