Skip to main content

Risk Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pearls of Glaucoma Management
  • 1286 Accesses

Abstract

POAG is a less aggressive disease compared to angle-closure glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. There is evidence regarding the natural course of untreated glaucoma thanks to the St. Lucia study and the early manifest glaucoma trial (EMGT). In the St. Lucia Study, 29% of eyes that were reexamined after 10 years had developed end-stage glaucoma, while 16% of patients were blind in at least one eye [77]. Most patients were untreated during the 10-year interval between exams. In the EMGT, 76% of untreated early glaucoma patients progressed (according to specific study criteria for progression on visual fields) after a median follow-up of 8 years, although specific data regarding rates of blindness are not available [38].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. .The AGIS Investigators. (2000) The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 130:429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Araie M, Arai M, Koseki N, et al. (1995) Influence of myopic refraction on visual field defects in normal tension and primary open angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 39:60–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. (2005) Diurnal IOP fluctuation: not an independent risk factor for glaucomatous visual field loss in high-risk ocular hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:513–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Hyman L, et al. (2007) Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 114: 205–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boland MV, Quigley HA. (2007) Risk factors and open-angle glaucoma: classification and application. J Glaucoma 16:406–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. (2000) Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 107:1287–1293.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandt JD. (2007) Central corneal thickness, tonometry, and glaucoma risk – a guide for the perplexed. Can J Ophthalmol 42:562–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, et al. (2001) Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 108:1779–1788.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buhrmann RR, Quigley HA, Barron Y, et al. (2000) Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural East African population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:40–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caprioli J, Coleman AL. (2008) Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 115(7):1123–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chauhan BC, Hutchison DM, LeBlanc RP, et al. (2005) Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 89: 1008–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen PP. (2003) Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 110:726–733.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chihara E, Sawada A. (1990) Atypical nerve fiber layer defects in high myopes with high-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 108:228–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Voogd S, Ikram MK, Wolfs RC, et al. (2005) Incidence of open-angle glaucoma in a general elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 112:1487–1493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ekstrom C. (1996) Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in central Sweden. The Tierp Glaucoma Survey. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 74:107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group, Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, et al. (2007) Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 114:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group, Pfeiffer N, Torri V, et al. (2007) Central corneal thickness in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 114:454–459.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. (2001) Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 85:85–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Forsius H. (1988) Exfoliation syndrome in various ethnic populations. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 184:71–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galassi F, Sodi A, Ucci F, et al. (2003) Ocular hemodynamics and glaucoma prognosis: a color Doppler imaging study. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1711–1715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:714–20; discussion 829–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grant WM, Burke JF, Jr. (1982) Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? Ophthalmology 89:991–998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Green CM, Kearns LS, Wu J, et al. (2007) How significant is a family history of glaucoma? Experience from the Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 35:793–799.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Greve EL, Furuno F. (1980) Myopia and glaucoma. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 213:33–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. (2005) Risk of glaucoma in ocular hypertension with and without pseudoexfoliation. Ophthalmology 112:386–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. (2001) Refractive error and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:560–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hattenhauer MG, Johnson DH, Ing HH, et al. (1998) The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105:2099–2104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268–1279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. (1988) Optic disk morphometry in high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:587–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jonas JB, Stroux A, Velten I, et al. (2005) Central corneal thickness correlated with glaucoma damage and rate of progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:1269–1274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, et al. (2006) Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 124:471–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwon YH, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, et al. (2001) Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132:47–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leske MC. (2007) Open-angle glaucoma – an epidemiologic overview. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 14:166–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, et al. (1994) The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 112:821–829.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, et al. (2008) Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 115:85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Leske MC, Nemesure B, He Q, et al. (2001) Patterns of open-angle glaucoma in the Barbados Family Study. Ophthalmology 108:1015–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et alet al. (2007) Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 114:1965–1972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, et al. (2001) Incidence of open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. The Barbados Eye Studies Group. Arch Ophthalmol 119:89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leske MC, Wu SY, Honkanen R, et al. (2007) Nine-year incidence of open-angle glaucoma in the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 114:1058–1064.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA. (2006) The probability of glaucoma from ocular hypertension determined by ophthalmologists in comparison to a risk calculator. J Glaucoma 15:426–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mayama C, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. (2002) Myopia and advanced-stage open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 109:2072–2077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes. Ophthalmology 110:1903–1908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. (2003) Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 135:131–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, et al. (2003) Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthal­mol 136:805–813.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, et al. (2008) Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuations and risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. Ophthal­mology 115(6):934–940.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. (1999) The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1319–1324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mitchell P, Hourihan F, Sandbach J, et al. (1999) The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 106:2010–2015.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Rait JL, et al. (2002) Five-year incidence of open-angle glaucoma: the visual impairment project. Ophthalmology 109:1047–1051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nemesure B, Honkanen R, Hennis A, et al. (2007) Incident open-angle glaucoma and intraocular pressure. Ophthal­mology 114:1810–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, Drance SM, et al. (2003) Visual field and optic disc progression in patients with different types of optic disc damage: a longitudinal prospective study. Ophthalmology 110:2178–2184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, et al. (2004) Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthal­mology 111:1627–1635.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group, European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group, Gordon MO, et al. (2007) Validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 114:10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Oliver JE, Hattenhauer MG, Herman D, et al. (2002) Blindness and glaucoma: a comparison of patients progressing to blindness from glaucoma with patients maintaining vision. Am J Ophthalmol 133:764–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pache M, Flammer J. (2006) A sick eye in a sick body? Systemic findings in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 51:179–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Perdicchi A, Iester M, Scuderi G, et al. (2007) Visual field damage and progression in glaucomatous myopic eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:534–537.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Quigley HA. (1999) Proportion of those with open-angle glaucoma who become blind. Ophthalmology 106:2039–2041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Quigley HA. (1996) Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80:389–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Quigley HA, Vitale S. (1997) Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:83–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Quigley HA, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. (1996) Rate of progression in open-angle glaucoma estimated from cross-sectional prevalence of visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 122:355–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. (2001) The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hisp­anic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol 119: 1819–1826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Racette L, Wilson MR, Zangwill LM, et al. (2003) Primary open-angle glaucoma in blacks: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 48:295–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, et al. (2003) Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology 110:1484–1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rotchford AP, Johnson GJ. (2002) Glaucoma in Zulus: a population-based cross-sectional survey in a rural district in South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol 120:471–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, et al. (2006) Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4254–4261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Martin J. (2004) Increased rate of visual field loss associated with larger initial visual field threshold values on follow-up of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 13:120–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Siddiqui Y, Ten Hulzen RD, Cameron JD, et al. (2003) What is the risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome? Am J Ophthalmol 135:794–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. (1991) Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 325:1412–1417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. (1995) Hypertension, perfusion pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol 113:216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. (1994) Family history and risk of primary open angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 112:69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. (1991) Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 266:369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Tokunaga T, Kashiwagi K, Tsumura T, et al. (2004) Association between nocturnal blood pressure reduction and progression of visual field defect in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 48:380–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Varma R, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, et al. (1994) Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol 112:1068–1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, et al. (2004) Preva­lence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology 111:1439–1448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Vesti E, Kivela T. (2000) Exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 19:345–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wiggs JL. (2007) Genetic etiologies of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 125:30–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wilson MR. (2002) Progression of visual field loss in untreated glaucoma patients and suspects in St Lucia, West Indies. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 100:365–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Ramrattan RS, et al. (1998) Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol 116: 1640–1645.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R, et al. (2003) Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma in a white population. Ophthalmology 110:211–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Xu L, Li Y, Wang S, et al. (2007) Characteristics of highly myopic eyes: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 114: 121–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nouri-Mahdavi, K. (2010). Risk Factors. In: Giaconi, J., Law, S., Coleman, A., Caprioli, J. (eds) Pearls of Glaucoma Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68240-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68240-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68238-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68240-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics