Skip to main content

Other Tests in Glaucoma: Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pearls of Glaucoma Management
  • 1289 Accesses

Abstract

Numerous electrophysiological tests have been proposed for detecting glaucomatous damage. Some involve electrical recordings from the eye, while others involve recordings from the cortex [1]. The focus of this chapter is on the latter, particularly the VEP, an electrical potential recorded with one or more electrodes placed over the occipital region of the skull. A variety of visual displays have been used to record VEPs and standards are available that describe clinical recording and analysis of the “conventional” VEP [2]. While the VEP is useful in the diagnosis of a variety of conditions [3], to date there is no convincing evidence that any of the standard VEP procedures perform better than standard automated perimetry (SAP) for detecting glaucomatous damage. However, a relatively new technique, the multifocal VEP (mfVEP), can be clinically useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hood DC (2003) Objective measurement of visual function in glaucoma. Cur Opin Ophthalmol 14:78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holder GE, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, et al; International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (2007) ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography – 2007 update. Doc Ophthalmol 114:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brigell MG (2001) The visual evoked potential. In: Fishman, GA, Birch DG, Holder GE, Brigell MG (eds.) Electro­physiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway, 2nd edition (Ophthalmology Mono­graphs). San Francisco: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, pp. 237–78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:65–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hood DC, Greenstein VC (2003) The multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:201–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al (2000) An intero­cular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophtha­lmol Vis Sci 41:1580–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI (2002) Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133:29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA (2000) Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9:10–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fortune B, Hood DC (2003) Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1364–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hood DC (2004) Electrophysiologic imaging of retinal and optic nerve damage: the multifocal technique. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:69–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hood D, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential (VEP): applications and limitations in neuro-ophthalmology. J Neuro Ophthalmol 23:279–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klistorner A, Graham SL (2000) Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmol 107:2283–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, et al (2005) The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual field? Vision Res 45:1155–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grippo TM, Hood DC, Kanadani FN, et al (2006) A comparison between multifocal and conventional VEP latency changes secondary to glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5331–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hood DC, Chen, JY, Yang EB, et al (2006) The role of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) latency in understanding optic nerve and retinal diseases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 104:71–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klistorner A, Graham SL, Martins A, et al (2007) Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 114:1613–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodarte C, Hood DC, Yang EB, et al (2006) The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential. Br J Ophthalmol 90:1132–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X (2000) Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:4032–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Semela L, Yang EB, Hedges TR, et al (2007) Multifocal visual evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 91:445–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen JY, Hood DC, Odel JG, Behrens MM (2006) The effects of retinal abnormalities on the multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4378–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, et al (2007) Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, et al (2006) Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique. J Glaucoma 15:321–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, et al (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage; a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Massicotte EC, Semela L, Hedges TR (2005) Multifocal visual evoked potential in nonorganic visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 123:364–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miele DL, Odel JG, Behrens, et al. (2000) Functional bitemporal quadrantopia and the multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro Ophthal 20:159–62.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA (1998) Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald C. Hood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hood, D.C., Ritch, R. (2010). Other Tests in Glaucoma: Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential. In: Giaconi, J., Law, S., Coleman, A., Caprioli, J. (eds) Pearls of Glaucoma Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68240-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68240-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68238-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68240-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics