Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics

  • Suhithi M. Peiris
Part of the Shock Wave and High Pressure Phenomena book series (SHOCKWAVE)

Detonation, which is the result of a reacting high explosive, is not a simple chemical reaction. Instead it is a complex process of rapid chemical changes that give rise to equally rapid mechanical and physical changes. Initially, as the explosive is initiated or Subscriptjected to a stimulus such as a shock wave, energy is transferred to the material causing mechanical deformation and heating. The transferred energy and heating produce chemically excited species, leading to initial bond-breaking or reaction initiation. These processes are thought to occur in a Hot-Molecule Zone (HMZ). Once reaction is initiated, sequences of chemical reactions follow resulting in the liberation of chemical energy and the production of gaseous reaction products.

To understand and predict the behavior of energetic materials, reaction rates and kinetic measurements of reactions in the HMZ need to be measured and understood. The initiation of chemical reactions and energy release from the HMZ or “hot spots” has been the Subscriptject of a great deal of research. However, dynamic measurements such as shock studies are limited to a few analytical techniques, simply because equipping such experiments with spectrometers and detectors that can capture fast chemistry during shock initiation is extremely challenging. Therefore, the parameters that characterize reaction kinetics, the reaction mechanism, and initial bond-breaking transitions states, are often evaluated at lower pressures and slower heating rates than exist in the HMZ and extrapolated to the probable conditions in the HMZ. Accurate prediction of reaction products and detonation modeling critically requires these parameters at high temperature and high pressure of the hot-molecule zone.

Keywords

Reaction Interface Energetic Material High Explosive Ammonium Perchlorate Diamond Anvil Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics (1980) Volume 22 “Reactions in the Solid State” edited by C. H. Bramford and C. F. H. Tipper, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. L. Lee and C. M. Tarver (1980) “Phenomenological model of shock initiation in heterogeneous explosives”, Phys. Fluids 23, 2362–2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. M. Tarver and J. O. Hallquist (1985) “Modeling short-pulse duration shock initiation of solid explosives”, Eighth International Detonation Symposium, Albuquerque, NM, 1985, Proceedings published by the Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, pp. 951–961.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. L. Lee, R. H. Sanborn and H. D. Stromberg (1970) “Thermal decomposition of high explosives at static pressures to 50 kilobars”, Fifth International Detonation Symposium, Pasadena, CA,1970, Proceedings published by the Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, pp. 331–337.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block and P. J. Miller (1989) “Effects of Pressure on the Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Chemical Reactivity of Nitromethane”, J Phys. Chem. 93, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. F. Angew, B. I. Swanson, J. Kenney and I. Kenney (1989) “Chemistry of nitromethane at very high pressure”, Ninth International Detonation Symposium, Portland, OR, 1989, Proceedings published by the Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, pp. 1019–1025.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Courtecuisse, F. Cansell, D. Fabre and J. P. Petitet (1995) “A Raman spectroscopic study of nitromethane up to 350°C and 35 GPa”, J. Phys. IV (Paris), 5, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. F. Rice and M. F. Foltz (1991) “Very high pressure combustion: reaction propagation rates of nitromethane within a diamond anvil cell”, Combust. Flame 87, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Frances Foltz and Jon L. Maienschein (1995) “Ammonium perchlorate phase transitions to 26 GPa and 700K in a diamond anvil cell”, Mater. Lett. 24, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. I. Pangilinan and T. P. Russell (1998) “Global Reaction Rates of the Laser-Induced Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate at static high pressures”, Eleventh International Detonation Symposium, Snowmass, CO, 1998, Proceedings published by the Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA, pp. 847–851.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Gump, L. Parker and S. M. Peiris (2003) “HMX (beta phase): laser-ignited reaction kinetics and isothermal equations of state”, 13th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, Portland, OR, July 20–25, 2003. Proceedings published by the American Institute of Physics, USA, 967–972.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block and P. J. Miller (1987) “Effects of pressure and temperature on the thermal decomposition of rate and reaction mechanism of β-octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine”, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 3872–3878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. B. Brill (1995) “Multiphase chemistry considerations at the surface of burning nitramine monopropellants”, J. Propul. Power, 11, 740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. J. Miller, S. Block and G. J. Piermarini (1991) “Effects of pressure on the thermal decomposition kinetics, chemical reactions and phase behavior of RDX” Combust.Flame, 83, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anthony P. Esposito, Daniel L. Faber, John E. Reaugh and Joseph M. Zaug (2003) “Reaction propagation rate in HMX at high pressure”, Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 28, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. France Foltz (1993) “Pressure dependence of the reaction propagation rate of TATB at high pressure” Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 18, 210–216.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. M. Peiris, G. I. Pangilinan and T. P. Russell (1999) “The laser-induced decomposition of TATB at static high pressure”, 11th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, Snowbird, UT, 27 June—2 July, 1999, Proceedings published by the American Institute of Physics, USA, pp. 849–852.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sushil K. Satija, Basil Swanson, Juergen Echkert and J. A. Goldstone (1991) “High-pressure Raman scattering and inelastic neutron scattering studies of triaminotrinitrobenzene”, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 10103–10109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. K. Rice and T. P. Russell (1995) “High-pressure matrix isolation of hetrogenous condensed phase reactions under extreme conditions”, Chem. Phys. Lett. 234, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suhithi M. Peiris

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations