Biofilms and Aseptic Loosening

Part of the Springer Series on Biofilms book series (BIOFILMS, volume 3)


Orthopaedic implants play a remarkable role in maintaining health and mobility. Unfortunately, implanted orthopaedic devices sometimes fail owing to a variety of factors, one of the most important of which is bacterial infection. However, in a significant proportion of cases, failure can not be clearly attributed to infection based primarily on the inability to isolate an offending bacterium. Such failures are often referred to as “aseptic loosening”. There is an ongoing debate as to whether at least some of these cases may in fact have an infectious etiology. If so, then there must be some explanation for why current diagnostic methods fail to detect the underlying infection. This is a critical debate in that the failure to detect infection necessarily compromises the ability to utilize the most appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This chapter summarizes the clinical issues surrounding aseptic loosening and discusses the possible reasons why conventional culture techniques may fail to detect infection.


Staphylococcus Aureus Aseptic Loosening Peptide Nucleic Acid Viable Bacterium Infectious Etiology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akisue T, Bauer TW, Farver CF, Mochida Y (2002) The effect of particle wear debris on NFκβ activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release in differentiated THP-1 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 59:507–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander EH, Hudson MC (2001) Factors influencing the internalization of Staphylococcus aureus and impacts on the course of infections in humans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates DM, von Eiff C, McNamara PJ, Peters G, Yeamon MR, Bayer AS, Proctor RA (2003) Staphylococcus aureus menD and hemB mutants are as infective as the parent strains, but the menadione biosynthetic mutant persists within the kidney. J Infect Dis 187:1654–1661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumert N, von Eiff C, Schaaff F, Peters G, Proctor RA, Sahl HG (2002) Physiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Microb Drug Resist 8:253–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayles KW, Wesson CA, Liou LE, Fox LK, Bohach GA, Trumble WR (1998) Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus escapes the endosome and induces apoptosis. Infect Immun 66:336–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Macapagal D, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS (2004) Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol 186:4665–4684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bi Y, Seabold JM, Kaar SG, Ragab AA, Goldberg VM, Anderson JM, Greenfield EM (2001) Adherent endotoxin on orthopedic wear particles stimulates cytokine production and osteoclast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 16:2082–2091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bori G, Soriano A, Garcia S, Gallart X, Casanova L, Mallofre C, Almela M, Martinez JA, Riba J, Mensa J (2006) Low sensitivity of histology to predict the presence of microorganisms in suspected aseptic loosening of a joint prosthesis. Mod Pathol 19:874–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brady RA, Leid JG, Camper AK, Costerton JW, Shirtliff ME (2006) Identification of Staphylococcus aureus proteins recognized by the antibody-mediated immune response to a biofilm infection. Infect Immun 74:3415–3426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaghan JJ, O’Rourke MR, Salch KJ (2004) Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty 19:31–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassat JE, Dunman PM, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Beenken KE, Palm KJ, Yang S-J, Rice KC, Bayles KD, Smeltzer MS (2006) Transcriptional profiling of a Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolate and its isogenic agr and sarA mutants reveals global differences in comparison to the laboratory strain RN6390. Microbiology 152:3075–3090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho DR, Shanbhag AS, Hong C-Y, Baran GR, Goldring SR (2002) The role of adsorbed endotoxin in particle-induced stimulation of cytokine release. J Orthop Res 20:704–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke MT, Roberts CP, Lee PT, Gray J, Keene GS, Rushton N (2004) Polymerase chain reaction can detect bacterial DNA in aseptically loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobbins JJ, Seligson D, Raff MJ (1988) Bacterial colonization of orthopedic devices in the absence of clinical infection. J Infect Dis 158:203–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellington JK, Reilly SS, Ramp WK, Smeltzer MS, Kellam JF, Hudson MC (1999) Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus invasion of cultured osteoblasts. Microb Pathog 26:317–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellington JK, Harris M, Webb L, Smith B, Smith T, Tan K, Hudson M (2003) Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: a mechanism for the indolence of osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg 85B:918–921Google Scholar
  17. Ellington JK, Harris M, Hudson MC, Vishin S, Webb LX, Sherertz R (2006) Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic resistance: implications for treatment of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. J Orthop Res 24:87–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenollar F, Roux V, Stein A, Drancourt M, Raoult D (2006) Analysis of 525 samples to determine the usefulness of PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for diagnosis of bone and joint infections. J Clin Microbiol 44:1018–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O’Gara JP (2005) The genetics of staphylococcal biofilm formation — will a greater understanding of pathogenesis lead to better management of device-related infection? Clin Microbiol Infect 11:967–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gonzalez V, Padilla E, Gimenez M, Vilaplana C, Perez A, Fernandex G, Quesada MD, Pallares MA, Ausina V (2004) Rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia using S. aureus PNA FISH. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:396–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gotz F (2002) Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol 43:1367–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gristina AG, Costerton JW (1985) Bacterial adherence to biomaterials and tissue: the significance of its role in clinical sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:264–273Google Scholar
  23. Greenfield EM, Bi Y, Ragab AA, Goldberg VM, Nalepka JL, Seabold JM (2005) Does endotoxin contribute to aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 72:179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haussier S (2004) Biofilm formation by the small colony variant phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol 6:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ince A, Rupp J, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Gille J, Lohr JF (2004) Is “aseptic” loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection? Clin Infect Dis 39:1599–1603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jonsson I-M, von Eiff C, Proctor RA, Peters G, Ryden C, Tarkowski A (2003) Virulence of a hemB mutant displaying the phenotype of a Staphylococcus aureus small colony variant in a murine model of septic arthritis. Microb Pathog 34:73–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kobayashi N, Bauer TW, Sakai H, Togawa D, Lieberman IH, Fujishiro T, Procop GW (2006) The use of real-time polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of skeletal tuberculosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1053–1056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kohler C, von Eiff C, Peters G, Proctor RA, Hecker M, Engelmann S (2003) Physiological characterization of a heme-deficient mutant of Staphylococcus aureus by a proteomic approach. J Bacteriol 185:6928–6937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kovacikova G, Lin W, Skorupski K (2005) Dual regulation of genes involved in acetoin biosynthesis and motility/biofilm formation by the virulence activator AphA and the acetateresponsive LysR-type regulator AlsR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 57:420–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krimmer V, Merkert H, von Eiff C, Frosch M, Eulert J, Lohr JF, Hacker J, Ziebuhr W (1999) Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in clinical samples by 16s rRNA-directed in situ hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 37:2667–2673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA (2004) Osteomyelitis. Lancet 364:369–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mack D, Becker P, Chatterjee I, Dobinsky S, Knobloch JK, Peters G, Rohde H, Herrmann M (2004) Mechanisms of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus: functional molecules, regulatory circuits, and adaptive responses. Int J Med Microbiol 294:203–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDowell A, Patrick S (2005) Evaluation of nonculture methods for the detection of prosthetic hip biofilms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:74–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mikkelsen DB, Pedersen C, Hojbjerg T, Schonheyder HC (2006) Culture of multiple peroperative biopsies and diagnosis of infected knee arthroplasties. APMIS 114:449–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moussa FW, Anglen JO, Gehhrke JC, Christensen G, Simpson WA (1997) The significance of positive cultures from orthopedic fixation devices in the absence of clinical infection. Am J Orthop 26:617–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nekhotiaeva N, Awasthi K, Neilsen PE, Good L (2004) Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus gene expression and growth using antisense peptide nucleic acids. Mol Ther 10:652–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson CL, McLaren AC, McLaren SG, Johnson JW, Smeltzer MS (2005) Is aseptic loosening truly aseptic? Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neut D, van Horn JR, van Kooten TG, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2003) Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nguyen LL, Nelson CL, Saccente M, Smeltzer MS, Wassell DL, McLaren SG (2002) Bacterial colonization of implanted orthopaedic devices: detecting bacterial colonization of implanted orthopaedic devices in revision arthroplasty by ultrasonication. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403:29–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliver JD (2005) The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol 43 Spec No:93–100Google Scholar
  42. Proctor RA, von Eiff C, Kahl BC, Becker K, McNamara P, Herrmann M, Peters G (2006) Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Resch A, Rosenstein R, Nerz C, Gotz F (2005) Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2663–2676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Resch A, Leicht S, Saric M, Pasztor L, Jakob A, Gotz F, Nordheim A (2006) Comparative proteome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic cells and correlation with transcriptome profiling. Proteomics 6:1867–1877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register 1975–1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scan 72:501–513Google Scholar
  46. Sanderson AR, Leid JG, Hunsaker D (2006) Bacterial biofilms on the sinus mucosa of human subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 116:1121–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoodley P, Kathju S, Hu FZ, Erdos G, Levenson JE, Mehta N, Dice B, Johnson S, Hall-Stoodley L, Nistico L, Sotereanos N, Sewecke J, Post JC, Ehrlich GD (2005) Molecular and imaging techniques for bacterial biofilms in joint arthroplasty infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:31–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sundfeldt M, Carlsson LV, Johansson CB, Thomsen P, Gretzer C (2006) Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop 77:177–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2006) Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol 44:628–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, Nixon JR, Anderson N, Davis RI, Hanna D, Ramage G (1998) Improved detection of infection in hip replacements: a currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg 80B:568–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon JR, Gorman SP, Davis RI, Anderson N (1999) Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37:3281–3290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaudaux P, Francois P, Bisognano C, Kelley WL, Lew DP, Schrenzel J, Proctor RA, McNamara PJ, Peters G, von Eiff C (2002) Increased expression of clumping factor and fibronectin-binding proteins by hemB mutants of Staphylococcus aureus expressing small colony variant phenotypes. Infect Immun 70:5428–5437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vesga O, Groeschel MC, Otten MF, Brar DW, Vann JM, Proctor RA (1996) Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants are induced by the endothelial cell intracellular milieu. J Infect Dis 173:739–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. von Eiff C, Bettin D, Proctor RA, Rolauffs B, Lindner N, Winkelmann W, Peters G (1997a) Recovery of small colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus following gentamicin bead placement for osteomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis 25:1250–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. von Eiff C, Heilmann C, Proctor RA, Woltz C, Peters G, Gotz F (1997b) A site-directed Staphylococcus aureus hemB mutant is a small-colony variant which persists intracellularly. J Bacteriol 179:4706–4712Google Scholar
  56. von Eiff C, Peter G, Becker K (2006a) The small colony variant (SCV) concept — the role of staphylococcal SCVs in persistent infections. Injury 37:S26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. von Eiff C, McNamara P, Becker K, Bates D, Lei X-H, Ziman M, Bochner BR, Peters G, Proctor RA (2006b) Phenotype microarray profiling of Staphylococcus aureus menD and hemB mutants with small-colony-variant phenotype. J Bacteriol 188:687–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weinrick B, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Fang Y, Novick RP (2004) Effect of mild acid on gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186:8407–8423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wooley PH, Schwarz EM (2004) Aseptic loosening. Gene Ther 11:402–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xing Z, Pabst MH, Hasty KA, Smith RA (2006) Accumulation of LPS by polyethylene particles decreases bone attachment to implants. J Orthop Res 24:959–966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang SJ, Dunman PM, Projan SJ, Bayles KW (2006) Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus CidR regulon: elucidation of a novel role for acetoin metabolism in cell death and lysis. Mol Microbiol 60:458–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle Rock

Personalised recommendations