Advertisement

Fitness determinants in creative industries: A longitudinal study on the Hollywood film-making industry, 1992–2003

  • Simone Ferriani
  • Gino Cattani
  • Charles Baden-Fuller

Abstract

It is often overlooked that fitness is a multidimensional concept, and that its components are context-specific. The multifaceted nature of fitness is most evident in cultural/creative industries, because firms are confronted with the challenge of balancing seemingly conflicting needs: artistic performance and commercial imperatives have to be satisfied for long term survival. In this study we examine two important component-traits that make up the fitness function for the Hollywood motion picture industry, which we argue are human capital and network capital. Although many studies have recognized the critical role of ‘creative’ human capital — which is typically embedded in individuals and groups — and network capital — that is, inter-organizational networks — we do not have many studies that empirically analyze their complex relationships using large scale data sets. We situate the analysis within the period 1992–2003, one in which we have good data and the industry appears relatively stable and very productive. While still exploratory, our paper shows how such human capital and network resources interact with the structure of the industry and influence different dimensions of the fitness function. We show how the traits work differently on the different dimensions of fitness to create a dynamic tension between creativity and performance.

Keywords

Fitness Human capital Network resources Commercial and artistic performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin Sci Quart, 45: 425–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási AL (2000) Error and attack tolerance in complex networks. Nature, 406: 378–382PubMedADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison PD (1999) Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison PD (2005) Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez JL, Svejenova S (2002) Symbiotic careers in movie making: Pedro and Agustin Almodovar. In: Peiperl M, Arthur M, Anand N (eds.) Career Creativity: Explorations in the Remaking of Work, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Argote L, Ophir R (2002) Inter-organizational learning. In: Baum JAC (ed.) Companion to Organizations, 181–207, Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Ascher S, Pincus E (1999) The Filmmaker’s Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for the Digital Age. PlumeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad Manage J, 47,6: 843–859Google Scholar
  9. Bailey EE, Helfat CE (2003) External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial Dec Econ, 24,4: 347–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker WE, Faulkner RR (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. Amer J Sociol, 97,2: 279–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin Sci Quart, 35: 61–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baty GB, Evan WM, Rothermel TW (1971) Personnel flows as inter-organizational relations. Admin Sci Quart, 16: 430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker G (1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  14. Becker H (1982) Art Worlds. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol, 2: 113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer J Sociol, 92: 1170–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet 6 for Windows. Analytic Technologies, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  18. Brass DJ, Burkhardt ME (1992) Centrality and power in organizations. In: Nohria N, Eccles RG (eds.) Networks and Organizations, HBS Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Bröcheler V, Maijoor S, van Witteloostuijn A (2004) Auditor human capital and audit firm survival: The Dutch audit industry in 1930–1992. Account Org Soc, 29,7: 627–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brouwer A, Wright T (1991) Working in Hollywood. Reissue Edition. Avon Books, NYGoogle Scholar
  21. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Castanias R, Helfat C (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J Manage, 17: 155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cattani G, Ferriani S (2005) A Social network perspective on individual creative performance: Evidence from the Hollywood film-making industry, 1992–2003. Paper presented at the 21st EGOS Conference, June 30–July 2, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Caves ER (2000) Creative Industries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Chandler A (1962) Strategy and Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coff R (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad Manage Rev, 22: 374–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Corman R, Jerome J (1990) How I Made a Hundred Movies in Hollywood and Never Lost a Dime. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. De Jong G (1994) The fitness concepts and the description of natural selection. Q Rev Biol, 69,1: 3–29MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2003) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Doty DH, Glick WH, Huber GP (1993) Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad Manage J, 36: 1196–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drazin R, Van den Ven AH (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin Sci Quart, 30: 514–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Faulkner RR, Anderson AB (1987) Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. Amer J Sociol, 92: 879–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flides RA (1990) Strategic challenges in commercializing biotechnology. Calif Manage Rev, 63–72Google Scholar
  35. Florin JM, Lubatkin M, Schulze W (2003) A social capital model of new venture performance. Acad Manage J, 46,3: 374–384Google Scholar
  36. Fruchterman T, Reingold E (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed replacement. Software Pract Exper, 21: 1129–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galunic DC, Eisenhardt KM (1994) Renewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 16, 215–255, JAI Press, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  38. Gimeno JF, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin Sci Quart, 42: 750–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glynn MA (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ Sci, 11,3: 285–298MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goble A (2003) The Complete Index to World Film. Valan PublishingGoogle Scholar
  41. Goldman W (1983) Adventures in the Screen Trade. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Manage J, 17: 109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Manage J, 20,5: 397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do inter-organizational networks come from? Amer J Sociol, 104,5: 1439–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hannan MT, Freeman JH (1989) Organizational Ecology? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  46. Hanneman R (2001) Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  47. Hawley AH (1950) Human Ecology. A Theory of Community Structure. The Ronald Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Hirsch P (1972) Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry system. Amer J Sociol, 77,4: 639–659MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on the strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad Manage J, 44: 13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hodgson GM (1996) Economics and Evolution. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  51. Holbrook MB (1999) Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion picture. J Consum Res, 26: 144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Honthaner EL (2001) The Complete Film Production Handbook. Focal Press, Burlington, MA, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  53. Jones C (1996) Careers project-networks: The case of film industry. In: Arthur MB, Russeau DM (eds.) The Boundaryless Career, Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones C, DeFillippi RJ (1996) Back to the future in film: Combining industry and self knowledge to meet career challenges of the 21st Century. Acad Manage Exec, 10,4: 89–104Google Scholar
  55. Jones C, Hesterly WS, Lichtenstein B, Borgatti SP, Tallman SP (1997) Intangible assets of teams: How human, social end team capital influence project performance in the film industry. Working Paper, Organization Studies Department, Boston CollegeGoogle Scholar
  56. Kamada T, Kawai S (1989) An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inform Process Lett, 31: 7–15zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Knudsen T (2004) General selection theory and economic evolution. J Econ Methodology, 11,2: 147–173MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lampel J, Lant T, Shamsie J (2000) Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organ Sci, 11,3: 263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Organization and Environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  60. Learned E, Christensen C, Andrews K, Guth W (1965) Business Policy: Text and Cases. Irwin, Homewood, ILGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee JJ (2000) The Producer’s Business Handbook. Focal Press, Burlington, MAGoogle Scholar
  62. Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manage Sci, 43,7: 934–950zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Manage J, 14: 95–113Google Scholar
  64. Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data-analysis using Generalized Linear-Models. Biometrika, 73,1: 13–22zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Litman BR (1998) The Motion Picture Mega-Industry. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  66. Litman BR, Kohl LS (1989) Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The’ 80s experience. J Media Econ, 2: 35–50Google Scholar
  67. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci, 2,1: 71–87MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Manage J, 20: 1133–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Metcalfe SJ (1998) Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. Routledge, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. Meyer MW, Gupta V (1994) The performance paradox. In: Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 309–369, JAI Press, Greenwich CTGoogle Scholar
  71. Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Miller D, Shamsie J (1996) The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad Manage J, 39,3: 519–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller D, Shamsie J (1999) Strategic responses to three kinds of uncertainty: Product line simplicity at the Hollywood film studio. J Manage, 25,1: 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miller D, Shamsie J (2001) Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Manage J, 22: 725–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Morley E, Silver A (1977) A film director’s approach to managing creativity. Harvard Bus Rev, 55,2: 59–68Google Scholar
  76. Nahapiet J, Goshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev, 23: 242–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  78. O’Neil T (2000) Movie Awards. Variety BooksGoogle Scholar
  79. Owen-Smith J, Riccaboni M, Pammolli F, Powell WW (2002) Acomparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Manage Sci, 48,1: 24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pennings JM (1987) Structural contingency theory: A multivariate test. Organ Stud, 8: 223–240Google Scholar
  81. Pennings JM, Lee K, van Witteloostuijn A (1998) Human capital, social capital and firm dissolution. Acad Manage J, 41,4: 425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  83. Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad Manage Rev, 28,1: 89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pfeffer J (1994) Competitive Advantage Through People. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  85. Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  86. Powell W, Kenneth W, Koput W, Smith-Doerr L, Owen-Smith J (1999) Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16: 129–159Google Scholar
  87. Powell W, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Quart, 41: 116–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Powell W, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer J Sociol, 110,4: 1132–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rao H, Drazin R (2002) Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–1994. Acad Manage J, 45,3: 491–507Google Scholar
  90. Ravid SA (1999) Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J Bus, 72,4: 463–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Reed R, DeFilippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad Manage Rev, 15,1: 88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rivkin J (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Manage Sci, 46: 824–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Robins JA (1993) Organization as strategy: Restructuring production in the film industry. Strategic Manage J, 14: 103–118Google Scholar
  94. Saundry S (1998) The limits of flexibility: The case of UK television. Brit J Manage, 9: 151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sawhney H, Lee S (2003) Arenas of Innovation: Fringe Groups and Discovery of New Liberties of Action. Working Paper of the Center for Social Informatics SLIS, Indiana University BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  96. Sawhney MS, Eliashberg J (1996) A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Sci, 15,2: 113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scott AJ (2002) A new map of Hollywood: The production and distribution of American motion pictures. Reg Stud, 36: 957–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Scott WR (1975) Organizational structure. Annu Rev Sociol, 1: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Seibert SM, Kraimer ML, Liden RC (2001) A social capital theory on career success. Acad Manage J, 2: 219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Shamsie J (2003) Exploiting the tie that binds: Dealing with issues of resource mobility in the U.S. motion picture industry. Working Paper of the Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  101. Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad Manage J, 44,4: 838–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Siggelkow N (2002) Evolution toward fit. Admin Sci Quart, 47: 125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sober E (2000) Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  104. Sorensen O, Waguespack D (2004) Social Networks and Exchange: Self-Confirming Dynamics in Hollywood. Working Paper presented at the Wharton School, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  105. Squire JE (1992) The Movie Business Book. Fireside Book, New York, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  106. Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol, 51: 3–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Stearns T, Hoffman A, Heide J (1987) Performance of commercial television stations as an outcome of inter-organizational linkages and environmental conditions. Acad Manage J, 30: 71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Svejenova S, Alvarez L (2002) Imprints of creative style on project network governance. Working Paper of the IESE School of BusinessGoogle Scholar
  109. Valente TW (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJGoogle Scholar
  110. Van de Ven AH, Drazin R (1985) The concept of fit in contingency theory. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 333–365, JAI Press, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  111. Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manage Rev, 14,3: 423–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Vogel HL (1998) Entertainment Industry Economics. Cambridge University Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  113. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  114. White H (1970) Careers and Creativity: Social Forces in the Arts. Westview Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  115. Zajac EJ, Kraatz MS, Bresser RKF (2000) Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Manage J, 21: 429–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Ferriani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gino Cattani
    • 3
  • Charles Baden-Fuller
    • 4
  1. 1.Marie Curie Research Fellow, Cass Business SchoolCity UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Management DepartmentUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Management & OrganizationsThe Stern School — NYUNew York
  4. 4.Cass Business SchoolCity UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations