Skip to main content

Decision Support Systems in Forest Management

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Handbooks Information System ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Numerous decision support systems have been developed for forest management over the past 20 years or more. In this chapter, the authors briefly review some of the more important and recent developments, including examples from North America, Europe, and Asia. In addition to specific systems, we also review some of the more-significant methodological approaches such as artificial neural networks, knowledge-based systems, and multicriteria decision models. A basic conclusion that emerges from this review is that the availability of DSSs in forest management has enabled more-effective analysis of the options for and implications of alternative management approaches for all components of forest ecosystems. The variety of tools described herein, and the approaches taken by the different systems, provide a sample of the possible methods that can be used to help stakeholders and decision makers arrive at reasoned and reasonable decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon, United Kingdom Woodland Assurance Scheme. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon, The UK Forestry Standard, 2nd Edition. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission and Forest Service of Northern Ireland, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon, Forestry Statistics 2005. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrue, B., A. Ollero and J. Dios, “An Intelligent System for False Alarm Reduction in Infrared Forest-Fire Detection,” IEEE Intell Syst, 5, 2000, 64-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P.D., C.P. Quine and J.A. Wright, “The use of digital terrain models to calculate windiness scores for the windthrow hazard classification,” Scot Forest, 49(4), 1995, 217-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, J.A. and D. Lowes, “Modelling change in state of complex ecological systems in space and time: An application to sustainable grazing management,” Environ Int, 25, 1999, 701-712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackard, J. and D. Dean, “Comparative accuracies of artificial neural networks and discriminant analysis in predicting forest cover types from cartographic variables,” Comput Electron Agr, 24, 1999, 131-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMLFUW, Sustainable Forest Management in Austria, Forest Report 2001. Vienna: The Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G. and A. Falcão, Simulação expedita de planos estratégicos para a área de eucaliptal da Stora Celbi, Celulose Beira Industrial, SA. Lisboa, Portugal: Grupo de Economia e Planeamento em Recursos Florestais, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, ISA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G. and A. Falcão, Simulação expedita de planos estratégicos para a área de eucaliptal da Silvicaima, Sociedade Sílvicola Caima. Lisboa, Portugal: Grupo de Economia e Gestão em Recursos Florestais, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, ISA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G. and A. Falcão, Simulação expedita de planos estratégicos para a área de eucaliptal da Portucel Florestal. Lisboa, Portugal: Grupo de Economia e Gestão em Recursos Florestais, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, ISA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G., A. Falcão, C. Miragaia, P. Marques and M. Marques, “A decision support system for forest resources management in Portugal,” in Arthaud, G.J. and Barrett T.M. (eds.), System Analysis in Forest Resources, Managing Forest Ecosystems, Volume 7. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 155-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G., H.M. Hoganson and A.O. Falcão, “Heuristics in multi-objective forest management,” in T. Pukkala (ed.), Multi-objective Forest Planning, Managing Forest Ecosystems, Volume 5. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 2002, pp. 119-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J.G., H.M. Hoganson and D.W. Rose, “Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve spatially constrained forest management scheduling problems,” Forest Sci 45, 1999, 201-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeron, P.S., H.C. Humphries and K.M. Reynolds, “Conducting large-scale conservation evaluation and conservation area selection using a knowledge-based system and GIS framework,” in Parks, B.O., Clarke, K.M. and Crane, M.P., (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling: Problems, Prospectus, and Needs for Research, [CD-ROM, ISBN: 0-9743307-0-1]. GIS/EM4 Conference; 2000 Sep 2-8; The Banff Centre, Banff, (AB) Canada. [Jointly published] Boulder: University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Denver: US Geological Survey, Center for Biological Informatics, and Boulder: NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Ecosystem Informatics, 2003. Accessed via http://www.institute.redlands.edu/emds/manuscripts/banff/banff326.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadmeadow, M. and D. Ray, Climate Change and British Woodland, Information Note 69. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadmeadow, M., D. Ray and C. Samuel, “Climate change and the future for broadleaved tree species in Britain,” Forestry, 78, 2005, 145-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, J. and D. Ray, “A Spatial Model of Ecological Site Classification for forest management in Britain,” in Konecny , M. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science in Brno, April 19-21, 2001, pp. 93-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Barrio, G., P. A. Harrison, P.M. Berry, N. Butt, M.E. Sanjuan, R.G. Pearson and T. Dawson, “Integrating multiple modelling approaches to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species’ distributions in contrasting regions: comparison and implications for policy,” Environ Sci Policy, 9, 2006, 129-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.R. and J.L. Clark, “A selective bibliography of expert systems in natural resource management,” AI Applications, 3, 1989, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, R., B.A. Gardiner, C.P. Quine and J. Suarez, ForestGALES : A PC-based wind risk model for British Forests – User’s Guide. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P.N. and J.M. Christie, Yield models for forest management, Forestry Commission Booklet 48. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcão, A., “DUNAS – A growth model for the National Forest of Leiria,” in Amaro, A and Tomé, M (eds.), Proceedings of the IUFRO Workshop Empirical and Process-Based Models for Forest Tree and Stand Growth Simulation. Oeiras, Portugal: Edições Salamandra, 1999, pp. 145-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcão, A. and J.G. Borges, “Designing decision support tools for Mediterranean forest ecosystems management: a case study in Portugal,” Ann For Sci, 62, 2005, 751-760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcão, A., J.G. Borges and M. Tomé, “SagFlor – an automated forest management prescription writer,” in Pukkala, T. and Eerikainen, K. (eds.), Growth and yield modelling of tree plantations in South and East Africa. Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry Research Notes, 97, 1999, pp. 211-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcão, A.O., M. Próspero dos Santos and J.G. Borges, “A real-time visualization tool for forest ecosystem management decision support,” Comput Electron Agr, 53, 2006, 3-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, B.A., H. Peltola and S. Kellomäki, “Comparison of two models for predicting the critical wind speeds required to damage coniferous trees,” Ecol Model, 129, 2000, 1-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, B.A. and C.P. Quine, “Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage – a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds,” Forest Ecol Manag, 135, 2000, 261-277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, B.A., J. Suarez, and C.P. Quine, “Development of a GIS based wind risk system for British forestry,” in Ruck, B., Kottmeier, C., Mattheck, C., Quine, C. and Wilhelm, G. (eds.), Wind Effects on Trees. Proceedings of International Conference 16-18 September 2003. Karlsruhe, Germany: Laboratory for Building and Environmental Aerodynamics, University of Karlsruhe, 2003, pp.145-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvetz, E. and F. Shilling, “Decision support for road system analysis and modification on the Tahoe National Forest,” Environ Manage, 32, 2003, 218-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia-Quijano, J.J., G. Deckmyn, E. Moons, S. Proost, R. Ceulemans and B. Muys, “An integrated decision support framework for the prediction and evaluation of efficiency, environmental impact and total social cost of domestic and international forestry projects for greenhouse gas mitigation: description and case studies,” Forest Ecol Manag, 207, 2005, 245-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S.N., K.N. Johnson, K.M. Reynolds, P. Crist and N. Brown, Decision support systems for forest biodiversity : evaluation of current systems and future needs. Final report, project A10. Washington, DC: National Commission on Science and Sustainable Forestry, 2005. Accessed via http://ncseonline.org/ NCSSF/DSS/Documents/docs/NCSSF_A10_final_report_040128sg.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R.E., “What is ecosystem management?,” Conserv Biol, 8, 1994, 27-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn A., G. Sutcliffe and D. Walker, “Knowledge acquisition for natural resource management,” Comput Electron Agr, 23, 1999, 71-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoganson, H.M. and J.G. Borges, “Using dynamic programming and overlapping subproblems to address adjacency in large harvest scheduling problems,” For Sci, 44, 1998, 526-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoganson, H.M. and D.W. Rose, “A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling,” For Sci, 30, 1984, 220-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M., G. Jenkins, L. Xianfu, J. Turnpenny, T. Mitchell, R. Jones, J. Lowe, J. Murphy, D. Hassell, P. Boorman, R. McDonald and S. Hill, Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report. Norwich, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, M., J. Alho, O. Kolehmainen and T. Pukkala, “Expert models for bilberry and cowberry yields in Finnish forests,” For Ecol Manage, 157, 2002, 15-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.N., S. Gordon, S. Duncan, D. Lach, B. McComb and K. Reynolds, Conserving creatures of the forest: a guide to decision making and decision models for forest biodiversity. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. and B. Lachman, Rapid scan of decision support system tools for land-use related decision making. Arlington, VA: NatureServe, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.N. and T.W. Stuart, FORPLAN version 2: mathematical programmer’s guide. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Land Management Planning Systems Section, 1987. Accessed via http://ncseonline.org/NCSSF/DSS/Documents/docs/Johnson2001.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetzky, R., “The relationship between the analytical hierarchy process and the additive value function,” Decis Sci, 13, 1982, 702-716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, B., B. Bare, R.C. Field and G.A. Bradley, “Natural resource land management planning using large-scale linear programs: the USDA Forest Service experience with FORPLAN,” Oper Res, 39, 1991, 13-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lexer, M.J., W. Lexer and H. Hasenauer, “The use of forest models for biodiversity assessments at the stand level,” Invest Agraria, 1, 2000, 297-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexer, M.J., H. Vacik, D. Palmetzhofer and G. Oitzinger, “A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria,” Comput Electron Agr, 49, 2005, 81-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., L. Zhang, C. Davis, D. Solomon, T. Brann and L. Caldwell, “Comparison of neural networks and statistical methods in classification of ecological habitats using FIA data,” For Sci, 49, 2003, 619-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, D.K., D.R. Holtfrerich, and S. Stipdonk, “Automated construction of rulebases for forest resource planning,” Comput Electron Agr, 21, 1998, 117-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maser, C., Sustainable forestry: philosophy, science, and economics. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, G.A. and H. Martins, “Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms,” For Ecol Manag, 230, 2006, 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.F. Windthrow Hazard Classification, Leaflet 85. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, W.L. “Expert systems in forest resources management,” in Dress, P. and Field, R. (eds.), The 1985 SAF Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, December 9-11, Athens, GA, USA, 1985, pp. 349-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., H. Raisinghainiand and A. Theoret, “The structure of unstructured decision processes,” Admin Sci Quart, 21, 1976, 246-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miragaia, C., J.G. Borges, A. Falcão and M. Tomé, “INfLOR, a management information system in forest resources,” in Pukkala, T. and Eerikainen, K. (eds.), Modelling the Growth of Tree Plantations and Agroforestry Systems in South and East Africa. Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry Research Notes, 80, 1998, pp.131-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miragaia, C., J.G. Borges, F.A. Rodrigues and L.C. Rodriguez, “Uma aplicação do sistema inFlor na gestão de dados florestais,” in Circular Técnica IPEF 190, IPEF-ESALQ, Brasil, Universidade de S. Paulo, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, B.C. and D. Ray, “Adaptive growth of tree root systems in response to wind action and site conditions,” Tree Physiol, 16, 1996, 891-898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.E., G. Rosenberg, S. Nath, B. Verma, H.M. Rauscher, M.J. Twery and M. Grove, “Goals and goal orientation in decision support systems for ecosystem management,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 27, 2000, 355-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nute, D.E., H.M. Rauscher, D.A. Perala, G. Zhu, Y. Chang and G.E. Host, “A toolkit approach to developing forest management advisory systems in Prolog,” AI Applications, 93, 1995, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C.D. and M. Twery, “Decision support systems: Models and analyses,” in Johnson, N.C., Malk, A.J., Sexton, W.T. and Szaro, R.C. (eds.), Ecological Stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2000, pp. 661-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palutikof, J.P., Holt, T. and A. Skellern, “Wind – resource and hazard,” in Hulme, M. and Barrow, E.M. (eds.), The Climate of the British Isles: Present, Past and Future. London: Routledge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, D.G., D. Ray, and J. Fletcher, An Ecological Site Classification for Forestry in Great Britain, Forestry Commission Bulletin 124. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C. and X. Wen, “Recent applications of artificial neural networks in forest resource management: an overview,” in Corté, U. and Sànchez-Marrè, M. (eds.), Environmental Decision Support Systems And Artificial Intelligence, Technical Report WS-99-07. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI, 1999, pp. 15-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukkala, T., “Introduction to multi-objective forest planning,” in Pukkala, T. (ed.), Multi-objective Forest Planning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 2002, pp. 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, C., “Estimation of mean wind climate and probability of strong winds for wind risk assessment,” Forestry, 73, 2000, 247-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, C.P., “Assessing the risk of wind damage to forests: practice and pitfalls,” in Coutts, M.P. and Grace, J. (eds.), Wind and Trees. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 379-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, C.P. and I.M.S. White, “Using the relationship between rate of tatter and topographic variables to predict site windiness in upland Britain,” Forestry, 67, 1994, 245-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, H., “Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review,” Forest Ecol Manage, 114, 1999, 173-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, H.M., J.W. Benzie and A.M. Alm, “A red pine forest management advisory system: knowledge model and implementation,” AI Appl, 4, 1990, 27-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., Ecological Site Classification Decision Support System V1.7. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., “Predicting National Vegetation Classification (NVC) woodland suitability using the Ecological Site Classification (ESC) decision support system (DSS),” in Goldberg, E. (ed.), National Vegetation Classification – Ten years’ experience using the woodland section, JNCC Report 335. Peterborough, UK: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and A. Broome, Ecological Site Classification : supporting decisions from the stand to the landscape scale, Forest Research Annual Report 2001-2002. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and A.C. Broome, “An information retrieval system to support management of Habitats and Rare Priority and Protected Species (HaRPPS) in Britain,” in Reynolds, K. et al. (eds.), Sustainable Forestry. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., J. Clare and A. Milner, An assessment of the ESC yield model for Sitka spruce, Unpublished Forest Research Internal Report. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and B. Nicoll, “Effects of soil water on root development and stability of Sitka spruce,” J Exp Bot (supplement), 47, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., G. Pyatt and M. Broadmeadow, “Modelling the future climatic suitability of plantation forest tree species,” in Broadmeadow, M. (ed.), Climate Change: Impacts on UK Forests, Forestry Commission Bulletin 125. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., K. Reynolds, J. Slade and S.J. Hodge, “A spatial solution to ecological site classification for British forestry using Ecosystem Management Decision Support,” in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on GeoComputation, University of Bristol, United Kingdom, September 1998, pp. 17-19. Accessed via http://www.institute.redlands.edu/emds/manuscripts/geocomp/geopap3.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D., J.C. Suarez and D.G. Pyatt, “Development of Ecological Site Classification decision support system for British forestry,” in Abrahart, R.J. (ed.), GeoComputation. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds, 1996, pp. 715-729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remsoft, “About the Remsoft spatial planning system,” in Allocation Optimizer User Guide. Fredericton, New Brunswick: Remsoft, 2005, pp. 9-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K.M., “Integrated decision support for sustainable forest management in the United States: fact or fiction?,” Comput Electron Agr, 49, 2005, 6-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K.M., NetWeaver for EMDS version 1.0 user guide: a knowledge base development system, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-471. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds K.M., J. Borges, H. Vacik, M.J. Lexer, “Information and communication technology in forest management and conservation,” in Hetemaki, L. and Nilsson, S (eds.), Information Technology and the Forest Sector, IUFRO World Series Volume 18. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Forest Research Organizations, 2005, pp. 150-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K.M., K.N. Johnson and S.N. Gordon, “The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability,” Forest Policy Econ, 5, 2003, 433-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K.M., S. Rodriguez and K. Bevans, User guide for the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System , Version 3.0. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K., J. Bjork, R.R. Hershey, D. Schmoldt, J. Payne, S. King, L. DeCola, M. Twery and P. Cunningham, “Decision support for ecosystem management,” in Johnson, N.C., Malk, A.J., Sexton W.T., and Szaro, R.C. (eds.), Ecological Stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2000, 687-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, R.P., J.G. Borges, C.M. Pereira, P.M. Sousa and J.P. Lé, “Designing an Integrated Forest Planning System for the forest industry: an application in Portugal,” in Bevers, M. and Barrett, T.M. (eds.), Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium, October 7-9, 2003, Stevenson, WA, USA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-656. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 2005, pp. 89-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, R.P., C. Miragaia and J.G. Borges, “A prototype management information system for plantation forests in Eastern and Southeastern Africa,” in Pukkala, T. and Eerikainen, K. (eds.), Establisment and management of tree plantations in Southern and Eastern Africa. Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry Research Notes, 120, 2000, pp. 121-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.A., D. Stallman and J.A. Bieri, “Modeling complex human-environment interactions: the Grand Canyon river trip simulator,” Ecol Model, 153, 2002, 181-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J.S., British Plant Communities 1: Woodlands and scrub. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D.W., J.G. Borges and M.H. Pelkki, “Forest management planning based on stand level decisions,” Northern J Appl For, 12, 1995, 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L., Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, D.A. and R. Ceulemans, “SECRETS: simulated carbon fluxes from a mixed coniferous/decidous Belgian forest,” in Ceulemans, R., Veroustraete, F., Gond, V. and Van Rensbergen, J.B.H.F. (eds.), Forest Ecosystem Modelling, Upscaling and Remote Sensing. The Hague: SPB, 2000, pp. 95-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoldt, D., “Application of artificial intelligence to risk analysis in forest management,” in von Gadow, K. (ed.), Risk analysis in forest management, Managing Forest Ecosystems, Volume 2. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 2001, pp. 49-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, K., A. Kamel, J. Sticklen, R. Ward, J. Ritchie, U. Schulthess, A. Rafea and A. Salah, “Guiding object-oriented design via the knowledge level architecture: The irrigated wheat testbed,” Math Comput Model, 20, 1994, 1-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, E. G., L.A. Leefers and J.E. Thompson, “A guide to computer-based analytical tools for implementing National Forest plans,” in General Technical Report INT-296. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, G., H. Wang, L. Dai, G. Wu, Y. Li, R. Lang and B. Song, “Integrating stand and landscape decisions for multi-purposes of forest harvesting,” Forest Ecol Manage, 207, 2005, 233-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, G.R., R.E. Belcher, C.J. Wood and B.A. Gardiner, “Wind and wind forces in a model spruce forest,” Bound-Lay Meteorol, 69, 1994, 311-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoms, D.M., J.M. McDonald and F.W. Davis, “Fuzzy assessment of land suitability for scientific research reserves,” Environ Manage, 29, 2002, 545-558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugumaran, R., “Development of an integrated range management decision support system,” Comput Electron Agr, 37, 2002, 199-205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattari, S., T. Schultz and M. Kuussaari, “Use of belief network modelling to assess the impact of buffer zones on water protection and biodiversity,” Agr Ecosyst Environ, 96, 2003, 119-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A.J., E. Allen and D. Morrison, “Forest tree disease diagnosis over the World Wide Web,” Comput Electron Agr, 21, 1998, 19-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomé, M., A. Falcão and A. Amaro, “GLOBULUS v1.0.0: a regionalized growth simulator for eucalypt plantations in Portugal,” in Ortega, A. and Gezan, S. (eds), Modelling Growth of Fast-Grown Tree Species, Proceedings, IUFRO Conference. Valdivia, Chile: IUFRO, 1998, pp. 138-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomé, M., M.B. Coelho, H. Pereira and F. Lopes, “A management oriented growth and yield model for cork oak stands in Portugal,” in Amaro, A. and Tomé, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the IUFRO Workshop Empirical and Process-Based Models for Forest Tree and Stand Growth Simulation. Oeiras, Portugal: Edições Salamandra, 1999, pp. 271-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E. and J. Aronson, Decision support systems and intelligent systems, 7th Edition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twery, M.J., P.D. Knopp, S.A. Thomasma, H.M. Rauscher, D.E. Nute, W.D. Potter, F. Maier, J. Wang, M. Dass, H. Uchiyama, A. Glende and R.E. Hoffman, “NED-2: A decision support system for integrated forest ecosystem management,” Comput Electron Agr, 49, 2005, 24-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacik, H. and M.J. Lexer, “Application of a spatial decision support system in managing the protection forests of Vienna for sustained yield of water resources,” For Ecol Manag, 143, 2001, 65-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacik, H., M.J. Lexer and M. Englisch, “Einsatz des Decision Support Systems DSD v1.1 zur Unterstützung der forstlichen Beratung im Landesforstdienst,” Forstarchiv, 75, 2004, 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, K., J. Humphrey, M. Griffiths, C. Quine and D. Ray, Evaluating Biodiversity in Fragmented Landscapes: Principles, Information Note 77. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., G. Shao, L. Dai, Z. Hao, L. Tang and H. Wang, “Mapping forest fire risk zones with spatial data and principal component analysis,” Sci China Ser E, 49 Supp. I, 2006, 140-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, T., Cultural heritage and historic environment, Sustainable forestry in brief. Forestry Commission, 2002. Accessed via http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/sfibculturalheritage.pdf/ $FILE/sfibculturalheritage.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, F., Intelligent systems for business. Expert systems with neural networks. Belmont, USA: Wadsworth, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, G., “DSSTOOLS: a toolkit for development of decision support systems in PROLOG,” M.S. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., R.G. Healey, and R. Aspinall, “A knowledge-based systems approach to design of spatial decision support systems for environmental management,” Environ Manage, 22, 1998, 35-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, K. et al. (2008). Decision Support Systems in Forest Management. In: Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2. International Handbooks Information System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics