Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Handbooks Information System ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Group decision support system (GDSS) technology is designed to directly impact and change the behavior of groups to improve group effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction, and has been studied for more than two decades by researchers. However, as a tool, it is appropriate for use in situations with certain characteristics and is not useful in others. This chapter delineates and discusses some of the key parameters of this approach based on a research model. Parameters are classified based on whether they are related to the technology, group, task, or context. Their benefits for GDSS outcomes are discussed to provide insight into the group decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • .Aiken, M., Krosp, J., Shirani, A., and Martin, J. “Electronic Brainstorming in Small and Large Groups,” Inform Manage, 27 1994, pp. 141-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albanese, R., and van Fleet, D.D. “Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free Riding Tendency,” Acad Manage Rev, 10 1985, pp. 244-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anson, R., Bostrom, R., and Wynne, B. “An Experiment Assessing Group Support System and Facilitator Effects on Meeting Outcomes,” Manage Sci, 41, 2, Februrary 1995, pp. 189-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B.B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C., and LaGanke, J.S. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis,” Organ Behav Human Decis Process, 87, 1 2002, pp. 156-179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., DeSanctis, G., and Nault, B.R. “Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment,” in: Recent Developments in Decision Support Systems, C. Holsapple and A. Whinston (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993a, pp. 383-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., and Lim, L.-H. “The Effects of Group, Task, Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies,” Small Group Res, 24, 4, November 1, 1993, pp. 430-462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, R.P., Anson, R., and Clawson, R.K. “Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems,” in: Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.), New York: Macmillan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, T., and Sivasankaran, T.R. “Relation between GDSS Use and Group Task Complexity: An Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 23rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Kauai, HI, 1990, pp. 69-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Hsu, P., Orwig, R., Hoopes, L., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Automatic Concept Classification of Text from Electronic Meetings,” Commun ACM, 37, 10 1994, pp. 56-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Orwig, R., and Titkova, O. “Information Visualization for Collaborative Computing,” IEEE Comput, 31, 8, August 1998, pp. 75-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., and Valacich, J.S. “Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups,” Manage Sci, 36, 6, June 1990, pp. 689-703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design,” Manage Sci, 32, 5 1986, pp. 554-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B.F., Whatley, A., Ash, S.R., and Steiner, R.L. “The Effects of a Group Decision Support System on Culturally Diverse and Culturally Homogeneous Group Decision Making,” InformManage, 30 1996, pp. 281-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreede, G.-J., and Briggs, R.O. “Collaboration Engineering: Designing Repeatable Processes for High-Value Collaborative Tasks,” Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreede, G.-J., Davison, R.M., and Briggs, R.O. “How a Silver Bullet May Lose Its Shine,” Commun ACM, 46, 8 2003, pp. 96-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Easton, A.C., Easton, G.K., George, J.F., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Ad Hoc Versus Established Groups in an Electronic Meeting System Environment,” Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1990a, pp. 23-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., and Gallupe, R.B. “A History of GSS Empirical Research: Lessons Learned and Future Directions,” in: Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.), New York: Macmillan, 1993a, pp. 59-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., George, J.F., Jessup, L.M., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Vogel, D.R. “Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings,” MIS Q, 12, 4, December 1988, pp. 591-624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Heminger, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Vogel, D.R. “Bringing Automated Support to Large Groups: The Burr-Brown Experience,” Inform Manage, 18 1990b, pp. 111-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., and Kinney, S.T. “Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality,” Inform Syst Res, 9, 3 1998, pp. 256-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Vogel, D.R. “A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems,” J Manage Inform Syst, 7, 3 1991a, pp. 107-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Tyran, C.K., Vogel, D.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “An Evaluation of Electronic Meeting Support for Strategic Management,” Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, 1990c, pp. 37-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. “Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One,” J Appl Psychol, 78, 4 1993b, pp. 531-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., and Nunamaker, J.F. “An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Group Size in an Electronic Meeting Environment,” IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics, 20, 5, September/October 1990d, pp. 1049-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Group, Subgroup, and Nominal Group Idea Generation in an Electronic Meeting Environment,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, 1991b, pp. 573-579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A.R., and Wixom, B.H. “Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis,” J Manage Inform Syst, 18, 3 2002, pp. 235-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, R.B. “A Foundation for the Study of Group Decision Support Systems,” Manage Sci, 33, 5, May 1987, pp. 589-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W. “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” Manage Sci, 33, 22 1987, pp. 589-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., and de Ven, A.H.V. “Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory,” Admin Sci Q, 30, 4 1985, pp. 514-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, A.C., Vogel, D.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Stakeholder Identification and Assumption Surfacing in Small Groups: An Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI, 1989, pp. 344-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. “An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results,” J Manage Inform Syst, 15, 3 1998, pp. 7-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. “Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies,” J Manage Inform Syst, 17, 3 2000, pp. 113-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size,” Acad Manage J, 35, 2 1992, pp. 350-369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallupe, R.B., DeSanctis, G., and Dickson, G.W. “Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation,” MIS Q, 12, 2, June 1988, pp. 277-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J.F., Easton, G.K., Nunamaker Jr., J.F., and Northcraft, G.B. “A Study of Collaborative Group Work with and without Computer Based Support,” Inform Syst Res, 1, 4 1990, pp. 394-415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P., Vogel, D., and Beauclair, R. “Assessing GDSS Empirical Research,” Eur J Oper Res, 46, 2 1990, pp. 162-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohowski, R., McGoff, C., Vogel, D., Martz, B., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors,” MIS Q, 14, 4, December 1990, pp. 369-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R., and Kaplan, R.E. “Interventions into Group Process: An Approach to Improving the Effectiveness of Groups,” Decis Sci, 5 1974, pp. 459-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.W. “Group Versus Individual Performance: Are N+1 Heads Better Than One?,” Psychol Bull, 91, 3 1982, pp. 517-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, R.S., and Turoff, M. “Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to Avoid Information Overload,” Commun ACM, 28, 7 1985, pp. 680-689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirokawa, R.Y., and Pace, R. “A Descriptive Investigation of the Possible Communication Based Reasons for Effective and Ineffective Group Decision Making,” Commun Monogr, 50 1983, pp. 363-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G.P. “A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technology on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making,” Acad Manage Rev, 15, 1 1990, pp. 47-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, H.-G., and Guynes, J. “The Effects of Group Size on Group Performance in Computer-Mediated Decision Making,” Inform Manage, 26, 4 1994, pp. 189-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, F.M., and Seibold, D.R. “Implications for Problem Solving Groups of Empirical Research on ‘Brainstorming’: A Critical Review of the Literature,” The Southern States Speech Commun J, 43 1978, pp. 327-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L.M., Tansik, D.A., and Lasse, T.D. “Group Problem Solving in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity on Group Process and Outcome with a GDSS,” Decis Sci, 2 1991, pp. 266-279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R.M., and Bricker, P.D. “Effects of Transmission Delay and Access Delay on the Efficiency of Verbal Communication,” J Acoust Soc Am, 41, 2, February 1967, pp. 286-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R.M., and Weinheimer, S. “Concurrent Feedback, Confirmation, and the Encoding of Referents in Verbal Communication,” J Person Social Psychol, 4, 3 1966, pp. 343-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.E., Lewis, S.H., and Swezey, L.W. “Listener Responsiveness and the Coordination of Conversation,” J Person Social Psychol, 43, 4 1982, pp. 718-731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., and Trommsdorff, G. “Group Versus Individual Performance on Tasks Requiring Ideational Proficiency (Brainstorming): A Review,” Eur J Social Psychol 1973, pp. 361-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, H.J., and Mueller, R.A. “Some Effects of Feedback on Communication,” Human Relat, 4, 4 1951, pp. 401-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limayem, M. “Human Versus Automated Facilitation in the GSS Context,” ACM SIGMIS Database, 37, 2-3 2006, pp. 156-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, L.A., and Alabdulkarim, A. “Facilitation of E-Meetings: State-of-the-Art Review,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on eTechnology, e-Commerce and e-Service, 2005, pp. 728-735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R.O., and Mitroff, I.I. Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A.P., and Clapper, D.L. “Element Finding: The Impact of a Group Support System on a Crucial Phase of Sense Making,” J Manage Inform Syst, 11, 4 1995, pp. 149-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J.E. Groups: Interaction and Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P.L. “An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis,” Human-Comput Interact, 7, 3 1992, pp. 257-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejias, R.J., Shepherd, M.M., Vogel, D.R., and Lazaneo, L. “Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico,” J Manage Inform Syst, 13, 3 1997, pp. 137-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennecke, B.E. “Using Group Support Systems to Discover Hidden Profiles: An Examination of the Influence of Group Size and Meeting Structures on Information Sharing and Decision Quality,” Int J Human-Comput Stud, 47, 3 1997, pp. 387-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennecke, B.E., Hoffer, J.A., and Valacich, J.S. “An Experimental Examination of Group History and Group Support System Use on Information Sharing Performance and User Perceptions,” Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1995, pp. 153-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theoret, A. “The Structure of ‘Unstructured’ Decision Processes,” Admin Sci Q, 21 1976, pp. 246-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, S.M., and Bostrom, R.P. “The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management,” J Manage Inform Syst, 10, 3, 1993, pp. 63-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, S.M., and Bostrom, R.P. “Meeting Facilitation: Process Versus Content Interventions,” J Manage Inform Syst, 15, 4, Spring 1999, pp. 89-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C.G. “Task Effects on Group Interaction,” J Person Social Psychol, 4, 5 1966, pp. 545-554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederman, F., Beise, C.M., and Beranek, P.M. “Issues and Concerns About Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator’s Perspective,” MIS Q, 20, 1, March 1996, pp. 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M., and Konsynski, B.R. “Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System,” J Manage Inform Syst, 3, 4 1987, pp. 5-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Applegate, L.M., and Konsynski, B.R. “Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support,” Oper Res, 36, 6, November/December 1988, pp. 826-848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., and George, J.F. “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work,” Commun ACM, 34, 7 1991, pp. 40-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Vogel, D.R., Heminger, A., Martz, B., Grohowski, R., and McGoff, C. “Experiences at IBM with Group Support Systems: A Field Study,” Decis Support Syst, 5, 2, June 1989, pp. 183-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking, (Second ed.) New York: Scribners, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.W. “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,” Organ Behav Human Perf, 16, 2 1976, pp. 366-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K.L. “The Effects of Electronic Meetings on Group Processes and Outcomes: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” Eur J Oper Res, 46, 2 1990, pp. 143-161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remus, W.E. “An Empirical Test of the Use of Graduate Students as Surrogates for Managers in Experiments on Business Decision Making,” J Bus Res, 14 1986, pp. 20-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., and Poole, M.S. “The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups,” Inform Syst Res, 3, 3 1992, pp. 224-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., and Rechner, P.L. “Experimental Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making,” Acad Manage J, 32, 4 1989, pp. 745-772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, (Third ed.) New York: McGraw Hill, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and McGuire, T.W. “Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication,” Organ Behav Human Decis Process, 37, 2 1986, pp. 157-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. Administrative Behavior, New York: Free, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D.G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., and Suchman, L. “Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings,” Commun ACM, 30, 1, January 1987, pp. 32-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I.D. Group Process and Productivity, New York: Academic, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S. “Group Size and Proximity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation: A Laboratory Investigation,” University of Arizona, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “Anonymity and Group Size Effects on Computer Mediated Idea Generation,” Proceedings of Academy of Management Meeting, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S., Jessup, L.M., Dennis, A.R., and Nunamaker Jr., J.F. “A Conceptual Framework of Anonymity in Group Support Systems,” Group Decis Negotiation, 1, 3, November 1992, pp. 219-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S., and Schwenk, C. “Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making,” Organ Behav Human Decis Process, 63, 2 1995a, pp. 158-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J.S., Wheeler, B.C., Mennecke, B.E., and Wachter, R. “The Effects of Numerical and Logical Group Size on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation,” Organ Behav Human Decis Process, 62, 3 1995b, pp. 318-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R.T., Ho, T.H., and Raman, K.S. “Culture: A Fourth Dimension of Group Support Systems,” Commun ACM, 37, 10 1994, pp. 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. “Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review,” Psychological Bulletin, 84, 5 1977, pp. 963-976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. “Social Facilitation,” Science, 149 1965, pp. 269-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nunamaker, J., Deokar, A. (2008). GDSS Parameters and Benefits. In: Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1. International Handbooks Information System. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48713-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics