Advertisement

The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research*

  • Scott Shane
  • Sankaran Venkataraman

Abstract

To date, the phenomenon of entrepreneurship has lacked a conceptual framework. In this note we draw upon previous research conducted in the different social science disciplines and applied fields of business to create a conceptual framework for the field. With this framework we explain a set of empirical phenomena and predict a set of outcomes not explained or predicted by conceptual frameworks already in existence in other fields.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Opportunity Entrepreneurship Research Business Venture Venture Creation Empirical Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Z., and Audretsch, D. 1987. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71: 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. 1990. Using an ecological perspective to study organizational founding rates. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 7–24 Spring.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H., and Wiedenmeyer, G. 1993. From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 1: 145–195.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H., and Zimmer, C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social networks. D. Sexton and R. Smilor (Eds.). The art and science of entrepreneurship. 3–23. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  5. Amit, R., Glosten, L., and Mueller, E. 1993. Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30: 815–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amit, R., Mueller, E., and Cockburn, I. 1995. Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors: 609–626. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. 1991. New firm survival and the technological regime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68: 520–526.Google Scholar
  9. Baron, R. in press Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about “what might have been.” Journal of Business Venturing. Google Scholar
  10. Baumol, W. J. 1989. Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings: 64–71.Google Scholar
  11. Baumol, W. 1993. Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumol, W. 1996. Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Becker, G., and Murphy, K. 1992. The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 1137–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Begley, T., and Boyd, D. 1987. Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., and Ziegler, R. 1992. Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Busenitz, L., and Barney, J. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, G., and Mosakowski, E. 1987. The career dynamics of self-employment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 570–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casson, M. 1982. The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
  19. Caves, R. 1998. Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, C., Greene, P., and Crick, A. 1998. Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, W., and Levin, R. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization, Vol. II: 1060–1107. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, A., Woo, C., and Dunkelberg, W. 1988. Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooper, A., Woo, C., and Dunkelberg, W. 1989. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Dunne, T., Roberts, M., and Samuelson, L. 1988. Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. Rand Journal of Economics, 19: 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans, D., and Leighton, L. 1989. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79: 519–535.Google Scholar
  27. Gartner, W. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10: 696–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gartner, W. B. 1988. Who is the entrepreneur? is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12:11–32.Google Scholar
  29. Geroski, P. 1995. What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13: 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gort, M., and Klepper, S. 1982. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal, 92: 630–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hannan, M., and Freeman, J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35: 519–530.Google Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D., and Lovallo, D. 1994. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. R. P. Rumelt, D. E. Schendel, and D. Teece (Eds.), Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda: 71–96. Boston: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  34. Kaish, S., and Gilad, B. 1991. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, and general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katz, J., and Gartner, W. 1988. Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13: 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khilstrom, R., and Laffont, J. 1979. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87: 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kirzner, I. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60–85.Google Scholar
  39. Knight, F. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
  40. Low, M., and MacMillan, I. 1988. Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14: 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McClelland, D. 1961. The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  42. Palich, L., and Bagby, R. 1995. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynolds, P. 1987. New firms: Societal contribution versus survival potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 2: 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reynolds, P., and White, S. 1997. The entrepreneurial process. Greenwich, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  45. Roberts, E. 1991. Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenberg, N. 1994. Uncertainty and technological change. Conference on growth and development: The economics of the 21st century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  47. Sarasvathy, D., Simon, H., and Lave, L. 1998. Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schumpeter, J. 1934. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  50. Shane, S. 1996. Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899–1988. Journal of Management, 22: 747–781.Google Scholar
  51. Shaver, K. G., and Scott, L. R. 1991. Person, process, and choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter: 23–42.Google Scholar
  52. Singh, J., and Lumsden, C. 1990. Theory and research in organizational ecology. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stinchcombe, A. 1965. Social structure and organizations. J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations: 260–290. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  54. Teece, D. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tushman, M., and Anderson, P. 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Utterback, J. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  57. Venkataraman, S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. J. Katz and R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth, Vol. 3: 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  58. Von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32: 791–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ward, T., Smith, S., and Vaid, J. (Eds.). 1997. Creative thought. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Shane
    • 1
  • Sankaran Venkataraman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MarylandUSA
  2. 2.University of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations