Skip to main content

Early Radiological Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Infection in Orthopaedic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • 1435 Accesses

Abstract

Today, peri-prosthetic septic complications are considered rare (between 1–2% of joint arthroplasties) due to the improvement of prophylactic measures and techniques developed in orthopaedic surgery in the recent years, which have enabled to control infections. However, these are particularly negative in terms of the patients’ outcome due to the high morbidity and the considerable medical costs related to their management. In the event of infection, two operations are often required after the original one to try to eradicate it and in many cases the treatment is not successful, having to sacrifice the prosthesis itself and leaving the patient heavily disabled in his movements. In the United States it was estimated that a minimum cost of 50,000 $ would be required for the treatment of each single patient, with an annual cost of 250 million $ [11, 18].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barberan J (2006) Management of infections of osteoarticular prosthesis. Clin Microbiol Infect 12(Suppl 3):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chacko TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K et al. (2002) The importance of the location of fluordeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful prostheses. Nucl Med Commun 23(9):852–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donlom RM (1991) Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant process. Clin Infect Dis 33(8): 1387–1392. Review.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fehring TK, Cohen B (1996) Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(5):543–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garvin KL, Hinrinhs, Urban JA (1999) Emerging antibiotic-resistant bacteria: their treatment in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (369):110–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goergen TG, Dalinka MK et al. (2000) Evaluation of the patient with painful hip or knee arthroplasty. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiol 215(Suppl):295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gristina AG (1987) Biomaterial-centered infections: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 237(4822):1588–1595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanssen AD, Rand JA (1998) Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 80(6):910–922.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Itasaka T, Kawai A, Sato T et al. (2001) Diagnosis of infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6(4):320–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lachiewictz PF, Rogers GD Thomason HC (1996) Aspiration of the joint before revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive colture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78(5):749–754.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP (1997) Treatment of infection at the site of total hip replacement. Instr Course Lect J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 79(11):1740–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ et al (1990) Total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic indium 111leukocyte activity and complementary technetium 99m-sulfur colloid imaging in suspected infection. J Nucl Med 31(12):1950–1955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Palestro CJ, Torres MA (1997) Radionuclide imaging in orthopaedic infections. Semin Nucl Med 27(4): 334–345. Review.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissues. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86(9): 1947–1954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Petty W (1978) The effect of methylmethacrylate on bacterial phagocitosis and killing by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 60(6):752–757.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pretty W, Spaniers S, Shuster JJ et al. (1985) The influence of skeletal implants on incidence of infections. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 67(8):1236–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saccente M (1998) Periprosthetic joint infections: a review for clinicians. Infect Dis Clin Pract 7:431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sculco TP (1995) The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics 18(9): 871–873.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith SL, Wastie ML, Forster I (2001) Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in the detection of significant complications after total knee joint replacement. Clin Radiol 56(3):221–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX et al. (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81(5):672–683.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stumpe KD, Noztli HP, Zanetti M et al. (2004) FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 231(2):333–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR (1994) Appearance of septic hip prosthesis on plain radiographs. Am J Roentgenol 163(2):377–380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Toms TA, Davidson D, Masri BA et al ((2006) The management of periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88(2):149–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuong C, Gerke C, Somerville GA et al (2003) Quorum-sensing control biofilm factors in the Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis 188(5):706–718.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. White LM, Kim JK Mehta M et al (2000) Complication of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging initial experience. Radiology 215(1):254–262.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhuang H, Chacko TK, Hickeson M et al (2002) Persistent non specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(10):1328–1333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallazzi, M.B., Chiapparino, R., Garbagna, P.G. (2007). Early Radiological Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Infection in Orthopaedic Surgery. In: Meani, E., Romanò, C., Crosby, L., Hofmann, G., Calonego, G. (eds) Infection and Local Treatment in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47998-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47999-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics