Skip to main content

Bone Loss: Does Use of the Spacer Affects it?

  • Chapter
  • 1418 Accesses

Abstract

Total hip replacement revision has always been an interesting and difficult challenge for surgeons. This challenge is even bigger in presence of an infected revision, since the control of infection is one of the key element for the implant final result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duffy PJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS et al (2005) Evaluation of patients with pain following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 87(11):2566–2575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duncan CP, Beauchamp C (1993) A temporary antibiotic-loaded joint replacement system for management of complex infections involving the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 24(4):751–759

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horan FT (2005) Robert Jones, Gathorne Girdlestone and excision arthroplasty of the hip. Historical notes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(1):104–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Ilstrup DM (1989) Two-stage reconstruction of the total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 71(6):828–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morshed S, Huffman R, Ries MD (2005) Extended trochanteric osteotomy for 2-stage revision of infected total hip artrhroplasty J Arthoplasty 20(3):294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX et al (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 81(5):672–683

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I (2004) The value of hip aspiration versus biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 19(5):582–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertazzoni Minelli E, Benini A, Magnan B et al (2004) Release of gentamicin and vancomycin from temporary human hip spacers in two-stage revision of infected arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(2):329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Magnan B, Regis D, Biscaglia R et al (2001) Preformed acrylic bone cement spacer loaded with antibiotics. Use of two-stage procedure in 10 patients because of infected hip after total replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 72(6):591–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Escobar, H.F., Romaña, R.T., Pérez, A.M., Márquez, J.A. (2007). Bone Loss: Does Use of the Spacer Affects it?. In: Meani, E., Romanò, C., Crosby, L., Hofmann, G., Calonego, G. (eds) Infection and Local Treatment in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47999-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47998-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47999-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics