Skip to main content

Assessment of the Vascular Flora Conservation Through Specific Indices - A Comparison Study in Central Europe

  • Chapter
Nature Conservation

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

  • 1280 Accesses

Abstract

In almost all countries with a well-founded law system, species-targeted conservation has legal support and plays a fundamental role in the protection of the most threatened plants. However, even in countries with a long tradition of plant conservation, there is little knowledge about its effectiveness and there is little or no possibility to compare the results of this kind of protection in different countries. Conservation methods using numerical indicators seem especially not to have been developed enough. To make the strategies of plant protection more effective and efficient, the author attempts to propose some measures for evaluating the status of flora conservation in a given area. The proposed indicators could also be useful in analyses of the results of protection, seen as the synanthropo-dynamic state of the vegetation (e.g. the amount of Red-listed or threatened species). For example, sozophytes as a group of sensitive plants could play the role of indicators of environmental quality. The proposed indicators are as follows: conservation indicator (C), threat conservation indicator (CK), tanatophytisation indicator (R), sozophytisation indicator (W) and conservation effectiveness indicator (E).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateman G., Egan V. (eds.)., 1993-The encyclopedia of World geography. Andromeda, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis S.D., Droop S.J.M, Gregerson P., Henson L., Leon C.J., Villa-Lobos J., Synge H., Zantovska J., 1986-Plants in danger. What do we know? Int. Union Conserv. Nat. Resources, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Given D.R., 1994-Principles and practise of plant conservation. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heywood V.H., Iriondo J.M., 2003-Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biological conservation, 113: 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holub J., Procházka F., 2000-Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia, Praha 72: 187–230.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ioras F., 2003-Trends in Romanian biodiversity conservation policy. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaźmierczkowa R., Zarzycki K. (eds.), 2001-Polish Red Data Book of Plants. Pteridophytes and Flowering Plants. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Institute of Nature Conservation. Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kornaś J., 1968-Geograficzno-historyczna klasyfikacja roślin synantropijnych. Mater. Zak?. Fitosocjol. Stos. UW, 25: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korneck D., Schnittler M., Vollmer I., 1996-Rote Liste der Farn-Und Blütenpflanzen (Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta) Deutschlands. In: Ludwig G., Schnittler M. (eds.), Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Bonn-Bad Godesberg. ss. 21–187.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kubát K. (ed.), 2002-Key to the flora of Czech Republic. Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manoliadis O.G., 2001-Environmental indices in irrigation management. Environmental Management, 28 (4): 497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marhold K., Hindák F. (eds.), 1998-Checklist of non-vascular and vascular plants of Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mirek Z., 1981-Problemy klasyfikacji roślin synantropijnych. Wiad. Bot., 25 (1): 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A., Zając M., 1995-Vascular Plants of Poland-a checklist. Polish Bot. Stud., Guideb. Ser., 15: 3–303.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morillo C., Gómez-Campo C., 2000-Conservation in Spain, 1980–2000. Biological Conservation, 95: 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nowak A., Nowak S., 2004-The effectiveness of plant conservation: a case study of Opole Province, Southwest Poland. Environmental Management, 34 (3): 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Piękoś-Mirkowa, H., 1990-The functioning of the plant species protection in Poland. In: Klimek K. (ed.), Protected areas and species conservation in Southern Poland-functioning, evaluation, perspectives, pp. 141–167. Zakład Ochrony Przyrody i Zasobów Naturalnych PAN, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polish Species Conservation Ordinance, 2001-Vol. no. 106, pos. 1176 from 29th September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pyšek P., Sádlo J. Mandák B., 2002-Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia, Praha, 74: 97–186.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Regulation, 1992-Regulation of the Ministry of the environment of the Czech Republic no. 395/1992b., Appendix 2-The list of the protected plant species.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reyers B., James A.N., 1999-An upgraded national biodiversity risk assessment index. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1555–1560.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reyers B., James A.N., van Jaarsveld A.S., McGeoch M.A., 1998-National biodiversity risk assessment: a composite multivariate and index approach. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 945–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnittler M., Günther K.-F., 1999-Central European vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures-an analysis from national Red List and distribution maps. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8: 891–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Villa F., McLeod H., 2002-Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environmental Management, 29 (3): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woodiwiss F.S., 1964-The biological system of stream classification used by the Trend River Board. Chemistry and Industry: 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zając A., 1979-Pochodzenie archeofitów występujących w Polsce (The origin of archeophytes occurring in Poland). Prace habilitacyjne nr. 29. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zarzycki K., 1986-Lista wymierających i zagrożonych roślin naczyniowych Polski [Red list of threatened vascular plants in Poland]. In: Zarzycki, K., Wojewoda, W. (eds.), Lista roślin wymierających i zagrożonych w Polsce [List of threatened plants in Poland], pp. 11–28. PWN, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zarzycki K., Kaźmierczakowa R. (eds)., 1993-Polish plant red data book. Pteridophyta and Spermatophyte. Polish Academy of Science, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zarzycki, K., Szeląg Z., 1992-Czerwona lista roślin naczyniowych zagrożonych w Polsce [Red list of threatened vascular plants in Poland]. In: Zarzycki K., Wojewoda W., Heinrich Z. (eds.), Lista roślin zagrożonych w Polsce [List of threatened plants in Poland], pp. 87–98. 2nd edition. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Kraków.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nowak, A. (2006). Assessment of the Vascular Flora Conservation Through Specific Indices - A Comparison Study in Central Europe. In: Gafta, D., Akeroyd, J. (eds) Nature Conservation. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47229-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics