Skip to main content

A New Ranking Method For Fuzzy FMEA

  • Conference paper
Applications and Science in Soft Computing

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 24))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we extend the method introduced by Bowles and Peláez (1995) for the risk ranking in Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). This method called as multi-ranking method allows combination of both the quantitative method (numeric ranking and fuzzy number) and the qualitative method (linguistic ranking) to be employed in the ranking of risk. It employs two types of aggregation method namely an input ranking aggregation and an output ranking aggregation method. Experimental investigations were carried out in actual industrial environment on a paste printing process of printed circuit board at Motorola, Penang, Malaysia. Comparisons were made between traditional FMEA Risk Priority Number (RPN) risk ranking and the newly proposed method. The results show that the use of both the qaulitative and quantitave information in the risk ranking could provides almost similar outcomes with that of the Fuzzy FMEA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowles JB, Peldez CE (1995) Fuzzy logic prioritization of failure in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50: 203 - 213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox E (1995) Fuzzy logic for business and industry. Charles River Media

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cox E (1998) The fuzzy system handbook. AP Professional

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilchrist W (1993) Modeling failure modes and effect analysis. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 10: 16 - 23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman A, Gupta M (1988) Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Elsivier Science

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems. Fuzzy Logic Controller: Part II, IEEE Trans. on Syst. Man and Cybernetics, 20: 419 - 435

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Stamatis DH (1998) FMEAfrom Theory to Execution, Milwaukee. ASQ Quality Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J (1999) Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritise design requirement in quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research, 37: 899 - 916

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh LA (1973) Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex system and decision process. IEEE Trans Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 3: 28 - 44

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hitam, M.S., Gobee, S., Subari, K. (2004). A New Ranking Method For Fuzzy FMEA. In: Lotfi, A., Garibaldi, J.M. (eds) Applications and Science in Soft Computing. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45240-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45240-9_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40856-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45240-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics