Skip to main content

New Heuristics for Flowshop Scheduling

  • Conference paper
Applications and Science in Soft Computing

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 24))

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

In the flowshop scheduling problem, n jobs are to be processed on m machines. The order of the machines is fixed. We assume that a machine processes one job at a time and a job is processed on one machine at a time without preemption. Let t p (i, j) denote the processing time of job j on machine i and t c (i, j) denote the completion time of job j on machine i. Let Jj denote the j-th job and M i the i-th machine. The completion times of the jobs are obtained as follows. For i = 1, 2,..., m and j = 1, 2,..., n, t c (M 1, J 1) = t p (M 1, J 1);t c (M i , J 1) = t c (M i−1, J 1) + t p (M i , J 1);t c (M 1, J j ) = t c (M 1, J j−1) + t p (M 1, J j ); t c (M i , J j ) = max{t c (M i−1, J j ),t c (M i ,J j−1)} + t p (M i ,J j ). Makespan is defined as the completion time of the last job, t c (M m , J n ). The goal is to obtain the n-job sequence that minimizes the makespan. The search space consists of n! possible job sequences. The problem is NP-hard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hajek B (1988) Cooling schedules for optimal annealing, Math. Ops. Res. 13: 311 - 329.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishibuchi H, Misaki S, Tanaka H (1995) Modified simulated annealing algorithms for the flow shop sequencing problem, European Journal of Operations Research 81: 388 - 398.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Koulamas C (1998) A new constructive heuristic for the flowshop scheduling problem, European J. of Operations Research 105: 66 - 71.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nawaz M, Enscore Jr EE, Ham I (1983) A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine n-job flowshop sequencing problem, OMEGA 11: 91 - 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogbu FA, Smith DK (1990) The application of the simulated annealing algorithm to the solution of the n/m/Cmax flowshop problem, Computers & Opr. Res. 17: 243 - 253.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Osman IH, Potts CN (1989) Simulated annealing for permutation flowshop scheduling, OMEGA 17: 551 - 557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chakraborty, U.K. (2004). New Heuristics for Flowshop Scheduling. In: Lotfi, A., Garibaldi, J.M. (eds) Applications and Science in Soft Computing. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45240-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45240-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40856-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45240-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics