A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods

  • Jesper Kjeldskov
  • Connor Graham
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2795)

Abstract

This paper examines and reviews research methods applied within the field of mobile human-computer interaction. The purpose is to provide a snapshot of current practice for studying mobile HCI to identify shortcomings in the way research is conducted and to propose opportunities for future approaches. 102 publications on mobile human-computer interaction research were categorized in a matrix relating their research methods and purpose. The matrix revealed a number of significant trends with a clear bias towards building systems and evaluating them only in laboratory settings, if at all. Also, gaps in the distribution of research approaches and purposes were identified; action research, case studies, field studies and basic research being applied very infrequently. Consequently, we argue that the bias towards building systems and a lack of research for understanding design and use limits the development of cumulative knowledge on mobile human computer interaction. This in turn inhibits future development of the research field as a whole.

Keywords

Mobile Phone Mobile Device Augmented Reality Ubiquitous Computing Building System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Basili, V.R., Selby, R.W., Hutchins, D.H.: Experimentation in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-12, 733–743 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benbasat, I.: An analysis of research methodologies. In: MacFarlan, F.W. (ed.) The Information System Research Challenge, pp. 47–85. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.R., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 7(3), 369–386 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohnenberger, T., Jameson, A., Kruger, A., Butz, A.: Location-Aware Shopping Assistance: Evaluation of a Decision-Theoretic Approach. In: Paternó, F. (ed.) Mobile HCI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2411, p. 155. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galliers, R.D.: Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Approaches: A Revised Taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 Working Conference on The Information Systems Research Arena of The 90’s, Copenhagen, Denmark (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B.: Evaluating the Usability of a Mobile Collaborative System: Exploring Two Different Laboratory Approaches. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems 2003, Orlando, Florida (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis, I.M.: Social Anthropology in Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Myers, M.D.: Qualitative Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 21(2), 241–242 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rapoport, R.N.: Three Dilemmas in Action Research. Human Relations 23(4), 499–513 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang, J., Yankelovich, N., Begole, B., Van Kleek, M., Li, F., Bhalodia, J.: ConNexus to Awarenex: Extending awareness to mobile users. In: Proceedings of CHI 2001, Seattle, WA, USA, ACM, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wynekoop, J.L., Conger, S.A.: A Review of Computer Aided Software Engineering Research Methods. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 Working Conference on The Information Systems Research Arena of The 90’s, Copenhagen, Denmark (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesper Kjeldskov
    • 1
  • Connor Graham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations