Abstract
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) have recently been proposed as a tool to unmix hyperspectral data. ICA is founded on two assumptions: i) The observed data vector is a linear mixture of the sources (abundance fractions); ii) sources are independent. Concerning hyperspectral data, the first assumption is valid whenever the constituent substances are surface distributed. The second assumption, however, is violated, since the sum of abundance fractions associated to each pixel is constant due to physical constraints in the data acquisition process. Thus, sources cannot be independent. This paper gives evidence that ICA, at least in its canonical form, is not suited to unmix hyperspectral data. We arrive to this conclusion by minimizing the mutual information of simulated hyperspectral mixtures. The hyperspectral data model includes signature variability, abundance perturbation, sensor Point Spread Function (PSF), abundance constraint and electronic noise. Mutual information computation is based on fitting mixtures of Gaussians to the observed data.
This work was supported by the Fundação para a ciência e Tecnologia, under the project POSI/34071/CPS/2000
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith, M.O., Johnson, P.E., Adams, J.B.: Quantitative determination of mineral types and abundances from reflectance spectra using principal component analysis. In: Proc. 15th Lunar and Planetary Sci. Conf., Part 2, Geophys. Res., February 1985, vol. 90, pp. C797–C804 (1985)
Gillespie, A.R., Smith, M.O., Adams, J.B., Willis, S.C., Fisher, A.F., Sabol, D.E.: Interpretation of residual images: Spectral mixture analysis of aviris images, owens valley, california. In: Green, R.O. (ed.) Proc 2nd AVIRIS Workshop, Jpl Publ., June 1990, vol. 90-54, pp. 243–270 (1990)
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R.: Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (1994)
Vane, G., Green, R., Chrien, T., Enmark, H., Hansen, E., Porter, W.: The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (aviris). Remote Sens. Environ. 44, 127–143 (1993)
Borel, C.C., Gerstl, S.A.: Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soils surface. Remote Sensing of the Environment 47(2), 403–416 (1994)
Common, P., Jutten, C., Herault, J.: Blind separation of sources, part ii: Problem statement. Signal Processing 24, 11–20 (1991)
Common, P.: Independent component analysis: A new concept. Signal Processing 36, 287–314 (1994)
Bayliss, J., Gualtieri, J.A., Cromp, R.: Analysing hyperspectral data with independent component analysis. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 3240, pp. 133–143 (1997)
Chen, C., Zhang, X.: Independent component analysis for remote sensing study. In: EOS/SPIE Symp. Remote Sensing Conference on Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing V, September 20-24, vol. 3871, pp. 150–158 (1999)
Tu, T.M.: Unsupervised signature extraction and separation in hyperspectral images: A noise-adjusted fast independent component analysis approach. Opt. Eng./SPIE 39(4), 897–906 (2000)
Chiang, S.-S., Chang, C.-I., Ginsberg, I.W.: Unsupervised hyperspectral image analysis using independent component analysis. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp, July 24-28 (2000)
Figueiredo, M.A.T., Jain, A.K.: Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 44(3), 381–396 (2002)
Bateson, C., Asner, G., Wessman, C.: Endmember bundles: A new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 38, 1083–1094 (2000)
Kruse, F.: Spectral identification of image endmembers determined from aviris data. In: Summaries of the VII JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop (1998)
Boardman, J., Kruse, F.: Automated spectral analysis: a geological example using aviris data, northern grapevine mountains, nevada. In: Proc. 10th Thematic Conference, Geologic Remote Sensing (1994)
Brumbley, C., Chang, C.-I.: An unsupervised vector quantization-based target signature subspace projection approach to classification and detection in unknown background. Pattern Recognition 32, 1161–1174 (1999)
Ren, H., Chang, C.-I.: A generalized orthogonal subspace projection approach to unsupervised multispectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 38(6), 2515–2528 (2000)
Chang, C.-I., Heinz, D.: Subpixel spectral detection for remotely sensed images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 38(3), 1144–1159 (2000)
Bell, A.J., Sejnowski, T.J.: An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation 10, 215–234 (1995)
Cardoso, J.: Infomax and maximum likelihood of source separation. IEEE Signal Processing Lett. 4(4), 112–114 (1997)
Hyvarinen, A., Oja, E.: Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13(4-5), 411–430 (2000)
Parra, L., Mueller, K.-R., Spence, C., Ziehe, A., Sajda, P.: Unmixing hyperspectral data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, 942–948 (2000)
McLachlan, G., Peel, D.: Finite Mixture Models. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (2000)
Attias, H.: Independent factor analysis. Neural Computation 11(4), 803–851 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nascimento, J.M.P., Dias, J.M.B. (2003). Does Independent Component Analysis Play a~Role in Unmixing Hyperspectral Data?. In: Perales, F.J., Campilho, A.J.C., de la Blanca, N.P., Sanfeliu, A. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. IbPRIA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2652. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44871-6_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44871-6_72
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40217-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44871-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive