On the Morphological Processing of Objects with Varying Local Contrast

  • Pierre Soille
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2886)

Abstract

Most morphological operators appear by pairs such as erosion/dilation, opening/closing, and thinning/thickening. These are pairs of dual operators with respect to set complementation. The output of a (dual) morphological operator applied to an object depends on whether it is a bright object over a dark background or a dark object over a bright background. When dealing with complex images such as earth observation data, there is no clear distinction between the background and the foreground because the image consists of a partition of the space into image objects of arbitrary intensity values. In this paper, we present an overview of existing approaches for tackling this problem and propose new techniques based on area filters applied first to the image extrema and then to all flat regions.

Keywords

Mathematical morphology self-duality self-complementa-rity partition region growing flat regions compression satellite images 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, R., Bischof, L.: Seeded region growing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine intelligence 16(6), 641–647 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crespo, J., Schafer, R., Serra, J., Gratin, C., Meyer, F.: The flat zone approach: a general low-level region merging segmentation method. Signal Processing 62(1), 37–60 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heijmans, H.: Morphological Image Operators. Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics Series. Academic Press, Boston (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heijmans, H.: Self-dual morphological operators and filters. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 6, 15–36 (1996), ftp://ftp.cwi.nl/pub/morphology/report/Heijmans_selfdual.ps.Z CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pesaresi, M., Benediktsson, J.: A new approach for the morphological segmentation of high resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(2), 309–320 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salembier, P., Garrido, L., Garcia, D.: Auto-dual connected operators based on iterative merging algorithms. In: Heijmans, H., Roerdink, J. (eds.) Mathematical Morphology and its Applications to Image and Signal Processing. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol. 12, pp. 183–190. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soille, P.: Advances in the analysis of topographic features on discrete images. In: Braquelaire, A., Lachaud, J.-O., Vialard, A. (eds.) DGCI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2301, pp. 175–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2002), http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2301/23010175.htm CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soille, P.: Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2003), See also http://ams.jrc.it/soille/book2nd MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soille, P., Pesaresi, M.: Advances in mathematical morphology applied to geoscience and remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(9), 2042–2055 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Soille
    • 1
  1. 1.EC Joint Research CentreInstitute for Environment and Sustainability, Land Management Unit, TP 262IspraItaly

Personalised recommendations