Advertisement

Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization, illustrated by the Traveling Salesman Problem

  • Maurice Clerc
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 141)

Abstract

The classical Particle Swarm Optimization is a powerful method to find the minimum of a numerical function, on a continuous definition domain. As some binary versions have already successfully been used, it seems quite natural to try to define a framework for a discrete PSO. In order to better understand both the power and the limits of this approach, we examine in detail how it can be used to solve the well known Traveling Salesman Problem, which is in principle very “bad” for this kind of optimization heuristic. Results show Discrete PSO is certainly not as powerful as some specific algorithms, but, on the other hand, it can easily be modified for any discrete/combinatorial problem for which we have no good specialized algorithm.

Keywords

Particle Swarm Optimization Particle Swarm Evolutionary Computation Travelling Salesman Problem Travel Salesman Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Kennedy J., “Small Worlds and Mega-Minds: Effects of Neighborhood Topology on Particle Swarm Performance”, Congress on Evolutionary Computation,Washington D.C., 1999, p. 1931–1938.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Angeline P. J., “Using Selection to Improve Particle Swarm Optimization”, IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation,Anchorage, Alaska, May 1998, p. 84–89.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Eberhart R. C., Kennedy J., “A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory”, Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, 1995, p. 39–43.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Kennedy J., Eberhart R. C., “Particle Swarm Optimization”, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 1995, p. 1942–1948.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kennedy J., “The Particle Swarm: Social Adaptation of Knowledge”, International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1997, p. 303–308.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kennedy J., “The behavior of particles”, Evolutionary VII, San Diego, CA, 1998, p. 581–589.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shi Y., Eberhart R. C., “Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization”, Evolutionary Programming VII,1998Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Shi Y. H., Eberhart R. C., “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer”, International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, May 4–9, 1998, p. 69–73.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Clerc M., “The Swarm and the Queen: Towards a Deterministic and Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization”, Congress on Evolutionary Computation,Washington DC, 1999, p. 1951–1955.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Clerc M., Kennedy J., “The Particle Swarm-Explosion, Stability, and Convergence in a Multidimensional Complex Space”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, 1, 2002, p. 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Helsgaun K., An Effective Implementation of the Lin-Kemighan Traveling Salesman Heuristic, Department of Computer Science,Roskilde University, Denmark, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wolpert D. H., Macready W. G., No Free Lunch for Search, The Santa Fe Institute, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kennedy J., Eberhart R. C., “A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm”, Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997, p. 4104–4109.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Yoshida H., Kawata K., Fukuyama Y., “A Particle Swarm Optimization for Reactive Power and Voltage Control considering Voltage Security Assessment”, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 15, 4, 2001, p. 1232–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Secrest B. R., Lamont G. B., “Communication in Particle Swarm Optimization Illustrated by the Travelling Salesman Problem”, Workshop on Particle Swarm Optimization,Indianapolis, IN: Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, 2001Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    He Z., Wei C., Jin B., Pei W., Yang L., “A New Population-based Incremental Learning Method for the Traveling Salesman Problem”, Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Washington D.C., 1999, p. 1152–1156.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kennedy J., “Stereotyping: Improving Particle Swarm Performance With Cluster Analysis”, Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2000, p. 1507–1512.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Coello Coello C. A., Toscano Pulido G., Lechuga M. S., Handling Multiple Objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization, EVOCINV-02–2002, CINVESTAV, Evolutionary Computation Group, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hu X., Eberhart R. C., “Multiobjective Optimization Using Dynamic Neighborhood Particle Swarm Optimization”, Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2002), Piscataway, New Jersey, 2002, p. 1677–1681.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurice Clerc

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations