Using Task Knowledge to Guide Interactor Specifications Analysis

  • José Creissac Campos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2844)


This paper looks at how to extend the type of analysis that can be done using interactor based models of interactive systems, the i2smv tool, and SMV. Originally, the type of analysis performed with i2smv/SMV was concerned with the exhaustive exploration of all possible behaviours of a device, with little direct consideration of the tasks it should support. The paper investigates how task related knowledge can be introduced into the approach in order to extend the range of properties that can be analysed.


Mobile Phone Model Check User Behaviour Task Model Task Description 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Campos, J.C.: Automated Deduction and Usability Reasoning. DPhil thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campos, J.C., Harrison, M.D.: Model checking interactor specifications. Automated Software Engineering 8(3/4), 275–310 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P.: Automatic verification of finitestate concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 8(2), 244–263 (1986)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duke, D.J., Harrison, M.D.: Abstract interaction objects. Computer Graphics Forum 12(3), 25–36 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duke, D.J., Barnard, P.J., Duce, D.A., May, J.: Syndetic modelling. Human-Computer Interaction 13(4), 337–393 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faconti, G., Paternò, F.: An approach to the formal specification of the components of an interaction. In: Vandoni, C., Duce, D. (eds.) Eurographics 1990, pp. 481–494. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fields, R.E.: Analysis of erroneous actions in the design of critical systems. DPhil thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McMillan, K.L.: Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Senges, V.: Task model - system model: towards an unifying formalism. In: Proceedings of HCI International conference, Yokoohama, Japan, July 1995, pp. 489–494. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paternò, F.D.: A Method for Formal Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, Available as Technical Report YCST 96/03 (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rushby, J.: Using model checking to help discover mode confusions and other automation surprises. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 75(2), 167–177 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ryan, M., Fiadeiro, J., Maibaum, T.: Sharing actions and attributes in modal action logic. In: Ito, T., Meyer, A.R. (eds.) TACS 1991. LNCS, vol. 526, pp. 569–593. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thimbleby, H.: Analysis and simulation of user interfaces. In: McDonald, S., Waern, Y., Cockton, G. (eds.) Proc. BCS Human Computer Interaction, vol. XIV, pp. 221–237 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richard, M.Y., Green, T.R.G., Simon, T.: Programmable user models for predictive evaluation of interface designs. In: Bice, K., Lewis, C. (eds.) CHI 1989 Proceedings, May 1989, pp. 15–19. ACM Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Creissac Campos
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de InformáticaUniversidade do MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations