Advertisement

Pathology Growth Model Based on Particles

  • Raimundo Sierra
  • Michael Bajka
  • Gábor Székely
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2878)

Abstract

Virtual reality based surgical simulators offer the possibility to provide training on a wide range of findings of different pathologies. Current research aims at a high fidelity hysteroscopy simulator. Different methods for the generation of pathologies have been investigated to realize the first surgical simulator that challenges the trainee with a new scene in every training session. In this paper, a particles-based tumor growth model is presented that overcomes different limitations of previous approaches. It allows for a realistic generation of both polyps and myomas protruding to different extents into the uterine cavity. The model incorporates several biological as well as mechanical factors, which influence the growth process and thus the appearance of the pathologies.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Cellular Automaton Uterine Cavity Surgical Simulator Vortex Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Cootes, T., et al.: Active Shape Models - Their Training and Application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cottet, G., Koumoutsakos, P.: Vortex Methods – Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jamora, C., Fuchs, E.: Intercellular adhesion, signalling and the cytoskeleton. Nature Cell Biology 4, 101–108 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelemen, A., et al.: Elastic Model-Based Segmentation of 3-D Neororadiological Data Sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(10), 828–839 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurman, R., Mazur, M.: Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marsaglia, G.: Choosing a Point from the Surface of a Sphere. Ann. Math. Stat. 43, 645–646 (1972)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montgomery, K., et al.: Surgical Simulator for Hysteroscopy: A Case Study of Visualization in Surgical Training. IEEE Visualization 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Netter, F.: Farbatlanten der Medizin, Band 3: Genitalorgane, 2nd edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, Stuttgart (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pébay, P., Baker, T.: A Comparison of Triangle Quality Measures. In: 10th International Meshing Roundtable, Proceedings, pp. 327–340 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quicken, M., et al.: Parameterization of closed surfaces for parametric surface description. In: CVPR, June 2000, vol. 1, pp. 354–360 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sierra, R., Bajka, M., Székely, G.: Pathology Design for Surgical Training Simulators. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H. (eds.) IS4TM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2673, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sierra, R., Székely, G., Bajka, M.: Generation of Pathologies for Surgical Training Simulators. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2489, pp. 202–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Székely, G., et al.: Virtual Reality-Based Simulation of Endoscopic Surgery. Presence 9(3), 310–333 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tonnesen, D.L.: Dynamically Coupled Particle Systems for Geometric Modeling, Reconstruction, and Animation. PhD thesisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimundo Sierra
    • 1
  • Michael Bajka
    • 2
  • Gábor Székely
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Vision GroupETH ZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Clinic of Gynecology, Dept. OB/GYNUniversity Hospital of ZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations