Skip to main content

The C-IPS Agent Architecture for Modeling Negotiating Social Agents

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2831))

Abstract

The basic concepts in agent negotiation are negotiation object, negotiation protocol and reasoning process. While aiming to transfer sociological concepts into multi-agent systems, where agents coordinate themselves by negotiation, we recognized the need for a more detailed structure. Therefore we developed C-IPS, which is presented in this article. It distinguishes between external constraints and internal reasoning processes. The reasoning process covers decisions regarding the negotiation issue, the partner, and a particular step. Its modularization supports the development of agents with different degrees of autonomy. The components of the C-IPS architecture are modeled according to the BDI approach. As an example for the application of C-IPS we consider agents that are required for the INKA project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourdieu, P.: Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: Kreckel, R. (ed.) Soziale Ungleichheiten. Soziale Welt. Sonderband 2, Schwarz, Göttingen (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brainov, S.: Altruistic cooperation between self-interested agents. In: Wahlster, W. (ed.) 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1996), pp. 519–523. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhard, H.-D.: Software-Agenten. Handbuch der Künstlichen Intelligenz, 3rd edn., pp. 943–1020. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlton, D.W., Perloff, J.M.: Modern industrial organization, 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dutta, P.S., Sen, S.: Identifying partners and sustenance of stable, effective coalition. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (poster paper), Montreal, Canada, May 28 - June 01 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, K., Müller, J.P., Pischel, M.: A pragmatic BDI architecture. In: Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Readings in Agents, pp. 217–224. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. Int. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kurbel, K., Loutchko, I.: Multi-agent negotiation under time constraints on an agent-based marketplace for personnel acquistion. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Multi-Agent Systems, Large Complex Systems, and E-Business (MALCEB2002), pp. 566–579. Erfurt, Germany (October 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Landesman, C.: The Voluntary Provision of Public Goods. PhD thesis, Princeton University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laux, H.: Entscheidungstheorie, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lettkemann, E., Meister, M., Hanft, A., Schröter, K., Malitz, R.: The description of practical roles in hospital environments. In: Lindemann, G., Jonker, C., Timm, I.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the MASHO Workshop: Modelling Artificial Societies and Hybrid Organizations. 25th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Aachen, Germany, pp. 29–36 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marichal, J.-L.: Behavioral analysis of aggregation in multicriteria decision aid. In: Fodor, J., De Baets, B., Perny, P. (eds.) Preferences and Decisions under Incomplete Knowledge. Series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. l51, pp. 153–178. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meister, M., Urbig, D., Gerstl, R., Lettkemann, E., Osherenko, A., Schröter, K.: Die Modellierung praktischer Rollen für Verhandlungssysteme in Organisationen. In: Wie die Komplexität von Multiagentensystemen durch Rollenkonzeptionen erhöht werden kann. Working paper tuts-wp-6-2002. Technical University – Technology Studies, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3), 261–292 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR 1991), San Mateo, CA, pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schillo, M., Vierke, G.: Multidimensional utility vectors in the transportation domain. In: Timm, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Agent Technologies and Their Application Scenarios in Logistics at ECAI 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Soh, L.-K., Tsatsoulis, C.: Agent-Based Argumentative Negotiations with Case- Based Reasoning. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Negotiation Methods for Autonomous Cooperative Systems (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urban, C.: PECS: A Reference Model for Human-Like Agents. In: Magnenat- Thalmann, N., Thalmann, D. (eds.) Deformable Avatars. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urbig, D., Díaz, D.M., Schröter, K. (2003). The C-IPS Agent Architecture for Modeling Negotiating Social Agents. In: Schillo, M., Klusch, M., Müller, J., Tianfield, H. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies. MATES 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2831. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39869-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39869-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20124-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39869-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics