Simultaneous MultiStreaming for Complexity-Effective VLIW Architectures

  • H. Pradeep Rao
  • S. K. Nandy
  • M. N. V. Satya Kiran
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2823)

Abstract

Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) architectures exploit instruction level parallelism (ILP) with the help of the compiler to achieve higher instruction throughput with minimal hardware. However, control and data dependencies between operations limit the available ILP, which not only hinders the scalability of VLIW architectures, but also result in code size expansion. Although speculation and predicated execution mitigate ILP limitations due to control dependencies to a certain extent, they increase hardware cost and exacerbate code size expansion.

Simultaneous multistreaming (SMS) can significantly improve operation throughput by allowing interleaved execution of operations from multiple instruction streams. In this paper we study SMS for VLIW architectures and quantify the benefits associated with it using a case study of the MPEG-2 video decoder. We also propose the notion of virtual resources for VLIW architectures, which decouple architectural resources (resources exposed to the compiler) from the microarchitectural resources, to limit code size expansion. Our results for a VLIW architecture demonstrate that: (1) SMS delivers much higher throughput than that achieved by speculation and predicated execution, (2) the increase in performance due to the addition of speculation and predicated execution support over SMS averages around 12%. The minor increase in performance might not warrant the additional hardware complexity involved, and (3) the notion of virtual resources is very effective in reducing no-operations (NOPs) and consequently reduce code size with little or no impact on performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Trimaran Compiler Infrastructure, http://www.trimaran.org
  2. 2.
    Tullsen, D.M., Eggers, S.J., Emer, J.S., Levy, H.M., Lo, J.L., Stamm, R.L.: Exploiting Choice: Instruction Fetch and Issue on an Implementable Simultaneous Multithreading Processor. In: 23rd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (May 1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kathail, V., Schlansker, M.S., Ramakrishna Rau, B.: HPL-PD Architecture Specification: Version 1.1. Technical report HPL-93-80, HP Laboratories (February 2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gyllenhaal, J.C., Hwu, W.W., Ramakrishna Rau, B.: HMDES Version 2.0 Specification. Technical Report, IMPACT-96-3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacome, M.F., de Veciana, G.: Design Challenges for New Application-Specific Processors. In: IEEE Design & Test of Computers (April-June 2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hwu, W.W., Mahlke, S.A., et al.: The Superblock: An Effective technique for VLIW and Superscalar Compilation. The Journal of Supercomputing, 224–233 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahlke, S.A., Lin, D.C., Chen, W.Y., Hank, R.E., Bringmann, R.A.: Effective Compiler Support for Predicated Execution Using the Hyperblock. In: 27th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, November 1994, pp. 217–227 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edler, J., Hill, M.: Dinero IV Trace-Driven Uniprocessor Cache Simulator, http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/edler/d4
  9. 9.
    Hwu, W.W., et al.: The IMPACT project, http://www.crhc.uiuc.edu/IMPACT
  10. 10.
    Aditya, S., Kathail, V., Rau, B.R.: Elcor’s machine description system: version 3.0. Technical Report HPL-98-128 (R.1), HP Laboratories (October 1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlansker, M.S., Ramakrishna Rau, B.: EPIC: An Architecture for Instruction-Level Parallel Processors. Technical Report HP-1999-111, HP Laboratories (February 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, C., Potkonjak, M., et al.: MediaBench: A Tool for Evaluating and Synthesising Multimedia and Communication Systems. In: 30th International Symposium on Microarchitecture, December 1997, pp. 330–335 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bringmann, R.A., Mahlke, S.A., Hwu, W.-M.: A Study of the Effects of Compiler-Controlled Speculation on Instruction and Data Caches. In: Proceeding of the 28th Annual International Conference on System Sciences (January 1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palacharla, S., Jouppi, N.P., Smith, J.E.: Complexity-Effective Superscalar Processors. In: 24th International Symposium on Computer Architecture, June 1997, pp. 206–218 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Schlansker, M.S., Ramakrishna Rau, B., Mahlke, S., et al.: Acheiving High Levels of Instruction-Level Parallelism with Reduced Hardware Complexity. Technical Report HPL-96-120, HP Laboratories (November 1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tullsen, D.M., Eggers, S.J., Levy, H.M.: Simultaneous Multithreading: Maximising on-chip Parallelism. In: 22nd AnnualInternational Symposium on Computer Architecture, June 1995, pp. 392–403 (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozer, E., Conte, T.M., Sharma, S.: Weld: A Multithreading Technique Towards Latency-Tolerant VLIW Processors. In: 8th International Conference on High Performance Computing (December 2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fritts, J., Wolfe, W.: Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Scheduling for Media Processors. In: MICRO-33 MP-DSP2 Workshop. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prasadh, R.G., Wu, C.L.: A Benchmark Evaluation of a Multithreaded RISC Processor Architecture. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing, August 1991, pp. I:84–91 (1991)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keckler, S.W., Dally, W.J.: Processor Coupling: Integrating Compile-time and Run-time Scheduling for Parallelism. In: 19th International Symposium on Computer Architecture (December 1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Partridge, R.: Cray Launches X1 for Extreme Supercomputing. Technology Trends, D.H. Brown Associates (November 2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Berkeley Multimedia Research Center, http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/
  24. 24.
    Aho, A.V., Sethi, R., Ullman, J.D.: Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Pearson Education Pte. Ltd., London (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Pradeep Rao
    • 1
  • S. K. Nandy
    • 1
  • M. N. V. Satya Kiran
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Aided Design Laboratory, SERCIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations