Skip to main content

A Methodology for the Induction of Ontological Knowledge from Semantic Annotations

  • Conference paper
AI*IA 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2829))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

At the meeting point between machine learning and description logics, we investigate on the induction of structural knowledge from metadata. In the proposed methodology, a basic taxonomy of the primitive concepts and roles is preliminarily extracted from the assertions contained in a knowledge base. Then, in order to deal with the inherent algorithmic complexity that affects induction in structured domains, the ontology is constructed incrementally by refining successive versions of the target concept definitions, expressed in richer languages of the Semantic Web, endowed with well-founded reasoning capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinnes, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Molitor, R.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Dean, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 96–101. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Badea, L., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H.: A refinement operator for description logics. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berners-Lee, T.: Semantic Web road map. Technical report, W3C (1998), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html

  5. DAML+OIL. DAML+OIL ontology markup language reference (2001), http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference

  6. DC. Dublin Core language reference (2003), http://www.purl.org/dc

  7. Donini, F., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Nutt, W.: Tractable concept languages. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 458–463 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donini, F., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Nutt, W.: An epistemic operator for description logics. Artificial Intelligence 100(1-2), 225–274 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Donini, F., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, M.: AL-log: Integrating Datalog and description logics. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10, 227–252 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S., Semeraro, G.: A generalization model based on OI-implication for ideal theory refinement. Fundamenta Informaticæ 47, 15–33 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S., Semeraro, G.: OI-implication: Soundness and refutation completeness. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, pp. 847–852 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haussler, D.: Learning conjuntive concepts in structural domains. Machine Learning 4, 7–40 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kietz, J.-U.: Learnability of description logic programs. In: Matwin, S., Sammut, C. (eds.) ILP 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2583, pp. 117–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kietz, J.-U., Morik, K.: A polynomial approach to the constructive induction of structural knowledge. Machine Learning 14(2), 193–218 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavrač, N., Flach, P., Zupan, B.: Rule evaluation measures: A unifying view. In: Džeroski, S., Flach, P.A. (eds.) ILP 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1634, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lisi, F., Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S.: Object identity as search bias for pattern spaces. In: Harmelen, F.V. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lyon, pp. 375–379. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nienhuys-Cheng, S., de Wolf, R.: Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(LNAI), vol. 1228. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nienhuys-Cheng, S., Laer, W.V., Ramon, J., Raedt, L.D.: Generalizing refinement operators to learn prenex conjunctive normal forms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1631, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. OWL. Web Ontology Language Reference Version 1.0. Technical report, W3C (2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref

  20. RDF. RDF Model and Syntax Specification. Technical report, W3C (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax

  21. RDF-Schema. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Technical report, W3C (2003), http://www.w3c.org/TR/rdf-schema

  22. Reiter, R.: Equality and domain closure in first order databases. Journal of ACM 27, 235–249 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rouveirol, C., Ventos, V.: Towards learning in CARIN-ALN. In: Cussens, J., Frisch, A.M. (eds.) ILP 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1866, pp. 191–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Stahl, I.: Predicate invention in Inductive Logic Programming. In: Raedt, L.D. (ed.) Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, pp. 34–47. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson, K., Langley, P.: Concept formation in structured domains. In: Fisher, D., Pazzani, M., Langley, P. (eds.) Concept Formation: Knowledge and Experience in Unsupervised Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F., Ferilli, S., Semeraro, G. (2003). A Methodology for the Induction of Ontological Knowledge from Semantic Annotations. In: Cappelli, A., Turini, F. (eds) AI*IA 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39853-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39853-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20119-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39853-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics