Skip to main content

Better Hill-Climbing Searches for Parsimony

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 2812))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The reconstruction of evolutionary trees is a major problem in biology, and many evolutionary trees are estimated using heuristics for the NP-hard optimization problem Maximum Parsimony. The current heuristics for searching through tree space use a particular technique, called “tree-bisection and reconnection”, or TBR, to transform one tree into another tree; other less-frequently used transformations, such as SPR and NNI, are special cases of TBR. In this paper, we describe a new tree-rearrangement operation which we call the p-ECR move, for p-Edge-Contract-and-Refine. Our results include an efficient algorithm for computing the best 2-ECR neighbors of a given tree, based upon a simple data structure which also allows us to efficiently calculate the best neighbors under NNI, SPR, and TBR operations (as well as efficiently running the greedy sequence addition technique for maximum parsimony). More significantly, we show that the 2-ECR neighborhood of a given tree is incomparable to the neighborhood defined by TBR, and properly contains all trees within two NNI moves. Hence, the use of the 2-ECR move, in conjunction with TBR and/or NNI moves, may be a more effective technique for exploring tree space than TBR alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, B., Steel, M.: Subtree Transfer Operations and their Induced Metrics on Evolutionary Trees. Annals of Combinatorics 5, 1–15 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonet, M., Steel, M., Warnow, T., Yooseph, S.: Better Methods for Solving Parsimony and Compatibility. Journal of Computational Biology 5(3), 409–422 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buneman, P.: The Recovery of Trees from Measures of Dissimilarity. Mathematics in the Archaelogical and Historical Sciences, pp. 387–395 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta, B., He, X., Jiang, T., Li, M., Tromp, J., Zhang, L.: On the Distances Between Phylogenetic Trees. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 427–436. ACM-SIAM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foulds, L.R., Graham, R.L.: The Steiner problem in Phylogeny is NP-complete. Advances in Applied Mathematics 3, 43–49 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitch, W.: Toward Defining Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specified Tree Topology. Systematic Zoology 20, 406–416 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goloboff, P.A.: Character Optimization and Calculation of Tree Lengths. Cladistics 9, 433–436 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goloboff, P.A.: Methods for Faster Parsimony Analysis. Cladistics 12, 199–220 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goloboff, P.A.: Analyzing Large Datasets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima. Cladistics 15, 415–428 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hein, J., Jiang, T., Wang, L., Zhang, K.: On the Complexity of Comparing Evolutionary trees. Discrete Applied Mathematics 71, 153–169 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, M., Tromp, J., Zhang, L.: On the Nearest Neighbour Interchange Distance Between Evolutionary Trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 182, 463–467 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maddison, D.R.: The Discovery and Importance of Multiple Islands of Most Parsimonious Trees. Systematic Zoology 43(3), 315–328 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, D.F., Foulds, L.R.: Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees. Mathematical Biosciences 53, 131–147 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson, D.F.: Comparison of Labeled Trees with Valency Three. Journal of Combinatorial Theory 11, 105–119 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Swofford, D., Olson, G.J., Waddell, P.J., Hillis, D.M.: Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn. ch. Phylogenetic Inference, pp. 407–425. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swofford, D.L.: Studies in Numerical Cladistics: Phylogentic Inference Under the Principle of Maximum Parsimony. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Warnow, T.: Tree Compatibility and Inferring Evolutionary History. Journal of Algorithms 16, 388–407 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ganapathy, G., Ramachandran, V., Warnow, T. (2003). Better Hill-Climbing Searches for Parsimony. In: Benson, G., Page, R.D.M. (eds) Algorithms in Bioinformatics. WABI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2812. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39763-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39763-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20076-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39763-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics