Skip to main content

A Full Explanation Facility for an MLP Network That Classifies Low-Back-Pain Patients and for Predicting MLP Reliability

  • Chapter
Book cover Innovations in Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 140))

  • 237 Accesses

Summary

This chapter presents a full explanation facility for any standard MLP network with binary input neurons that performs a classification task. The interpretation of any input case is represented by a non-linear ranked data relationship of key inputs. The knowledge that the MLP has learned is represented by ranked class profiles or as a set of rules. The explanation facility discovers the MLP knowledge bounds, enabling novelty detection to be implemented and the predictability of the MLP to be investigated. Results using the facility are presented for a 48-dimensional real world MLP that classifies low-back-pain patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews R, Diederich J, Tickle AB (1995) Survey and Critique of Techniques for Extracting Rules from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 8 (6): 373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G (1994) Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14. AHCPR Publication No. 95–0642. U.S. DHHS

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bologna, G (1996), Rule Extraction from the IMLP Neural Network: A Comparative Study. Proc. NIPS’96 Workshop of Rule Extraction from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Queensland Univ. Technol

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bounds DG, Lloyd PJ, Mathew B (1990) A Comparison of Neural Network and Other Pattern Recognition Approaches to the Diagnosis of Low Back Disorders. Neural Networks Vol. 3. 583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cloete I, Zurada JM (1999) Knowledge-Based Neurocomputing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craven MW, Shavlik JW (1993) Learning symbolic rules using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Amherst MA, USA. Morgan Kauffman, pp 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craven MW, Shavlik JW (1994) Using Sampling and Queries to Extract Rules from Trained Neural Networks. In: Machine Learning. Proceedings Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning, Amherst, MA,USA. Morgan Kaufmann, pp 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denker J, Schwarz D, Witmer B, Solla S, Howard R, Jackel, L, Hopfield J (1987) Large Automatic Learning, Rule Extraction, and Generalisation. Complex Systems, 1, 877–922

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fu L (1994) Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallant SI (1993) Neural Network Learning and Expert Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson D, Llewelyn-Phillips H, Klaber-Moffett J (1996) Categorization of Back Pain Patients Using an Evidence Based Approach. Musculoskeletal Management 2: 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnan R (1996) A Systematic Method for Decompositional Rule Extraction from Neural Networks. Proceedings NIPS’96 Workshop of Rule Extraction from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Queensland University of Technology, pp 38–45

    Google Scholar 

  13. Looney CG (1997) Pattern Recognition Using Neural Networks. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maire F (1997) A Partial Order for the M-of-N Rule Extraction Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 8: 1542–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito K, Nakano R (1996) Law Discovery Using Neural Networks. Proceedings NIPS’96 Workshop of Rule Extraction from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Queensland University of Technology, pp 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  16. Setiono R (1997) Extracting Rules from Neural Networks by Pruning and Hidden Unit Splitting. Neural Computing 1 9: 205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taha IA, Ghosh J (1999) Symbolic Interpretation of Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 11 (3): 448–463

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thrun, SB (1995) Extracting rules from artificial neural networks with distributed representations. In: Tesauro G, Touretzky D, Leen T (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 7: 505–512

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tickle AB, Orlowski M, Diederich J (1996) DEDEC: A Methodology for Extracting Rules from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. In: Proceedings NIPS’96 Workshop of Rule Extraction from Trained Artificial Neural Networks. Queensland University of Technology, pp 90–102

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tickle AB, Andrews R, Golea M, Diederich J (1998) The Truth Will Come to Light: Directions and Challenges in Extracting the Knowledge Embedded Within Trained Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 9 (6): 1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Towell, GG, Shavlik JW (1993) Extracting Refined Rules from Knowledge Based Neural Networks. Machine Learning 13: 71–101

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vaughn ML (1996) Interpretation and Knowledge Discovery from the Multi Layer Perceptron Network: Opening the Black Box. Neural Computing www Applications Journal. 4 (2): 72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaughn ML, (1999) Derivation of the Weight Constraints for Direct Knowledge Discovery from the Multilayer Perceptron Network. Neural Networks 12: 1259–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaughn ML, Cavill SJ, Taylor SJ, Foy MA, Fogg AJB (2000) Direct Explanations and Knowledge Extraction from a Multilayer Perceptron Network that Performs Low Back Pain Classification. In: Wermter S, Sun R (eds) Hybrid Neural Systems. Springer, pp 270–285

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaughn ML, Cavill SJ, Taylor SJ, Foy MA, Fogg AJB (2001) Direct Explanations for the Development and Use of a Multi-Layer Perceptron Network that Classifies Low Back Pain Patients. International Journal Neural Systems 11(4):335–347

    Google Scholar 

  26. Waddell G (1987) A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-Back Pain. Spine 12 (7): 632–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Waddell G, Bircher M, Finlayson D, Main C (1984) Symptoms and Signs: Physical Disease or Illness Behaviour. BMJ 289: 739–741

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wermter S, Sun R (2000) Hybrid Neural Systems, Springer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaughn, M.L., Cavill, S.J., Taylor, S.J., Foy, M.A., Fogg, A.J.B. (2004). A Full Explanation Facility for an MLP Network That Classifies Low-Back-Pain Patients and for Predicting MLP Reliability. In: Abraham, A., Jain, L., van der Zwaag, B.J. (eds) Innovations in Intelligent Systems. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39615-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39615-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05784-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39615-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics