Advertisement

Meta-evolutionary Game Dynamics for Mathematical Modelling of Rules Dynamics

  • Takashi Hashimoto
  • Yuya Kumagai
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2801)

Abstract

This paper proposes an evolutionary-game-theory model, called meta-evolutionary game dynamics, for studying the dynamics of rules and individual behaviour. Although there are two game theoretical views of rules, i.e., seeing rules as game forms and as equilibria of games, endogenous changes of rules are not modelled effectively by either of these two views. We introduce a model for integrating the two views, in which the interaction rules of replicator equations change dynamically. Computer simulations of an example of the model that include mutation and extinction of both strategies and games show (1) an intermittent change of strategy distributions, (2) a continual transition from a dominant strategy to another, and (3) metastable states distinct from the Nash equilibria. We discuss the notion of evolutionary stability of games and some natural examples showing rule dynamics. We conclude that meta-evolutionary game dynamics enables the study of the endogenous dynamic of rules. Our model contributes, therefore, the development of game theory approach to the dynamics of rules.

Keywords

Dynamics of rules Mathematical modelling Meta-evolutionary game dynamics Replicator equations Evolutionary stable games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hurwicz, L.: Institutions as Families of Game Forms. Japanese Economic Review 47, 113–132 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis, D.: Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Young, H.P.: Individual Strategy and Social Structure – An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aoki, M.: Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weibull, J.W.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor, P., Jonker, L.: Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences 40, 145–156 (1978)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basar, T., Olsder, G.J.: Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maynard-Smith, J.: Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsuda, I.: Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dynamical systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 793–847 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karmiloff-Smith, A.: Beyond Modularity – A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maynard-Smith, J., Szathmary, E.: The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Namikawa, J., Hashimoto, T.: Dynamics and computation in functional shifts. Nonlinearity (submitted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Hashimoto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuya Kumagai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Knowledge ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST)IshikawaJapan
  2. 2.Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity of Edinburgh 

Personalised recommendations