Skip to main content

The Emperor’s New Clothes: The ECB and the New Institutional Concept

  • Conference paper
The Unity of the European Constitution

Part of the book series: Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht ((BEITRÄGE,volume 186))

  • 433 Accesses

Abstract

Taking a look at the ECB of today means, to a certain extent, rethinking the emperor’s idea. The European Central Bank is independent and seems almost untouchable in its field of responsibility. Its self-image is stamped by its special status outside the institutional structure of the European Union. However, the indefeasibility and with it the self-conception of the ECB was finally questioned by the European Court of Justice. The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe designs a new institutional setting and possibly constitutes a new understanding. The question is to what extent does this new institutional setting redefine the special status of the ESCB and the ECB, and how does it affect questions of democratic accountability and legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hans Christian Andersen, The Emperor’s new Clothes (1837).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Michel Clapié, Institutions européennes 239 (2003); Anthony Arnull et.al., European Union Law 522 (4th ed., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The EURO is not the common currency of the European Union but the mutual currency of the (now 12) Member States that have joined the euro area, see Hugo J. Hahn & Ulrich Häde, Die Zentralbank vor Gericht, 165 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels-und Wirtschaftsrecht 30, 32 (2001); European Central Bank (ed.), The Monetary Policy of the ECB 9 (2004), <http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/monetarypolicy2004en.pdf.>

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, The Road to Monetary Union in Europe 2 (2d ed., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Paul Craig & Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law 695 (3rd edition, 2003); Paul Magnette, Towards “Accountable Independence?” Parliamentary Control of the European Central Bank and the Rise of a New Democratic Model, 4 European Law Journal 326, 328 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christian Seiler, Das Europäische System der Zentralbanken (ESZB) als Verantwortungsverbund: Systemgebundene Aufgabenerfüllung durch eigenständige Kompetenzträger, 1 Europarecht 52, 54 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanspeter K. Scheller, The European Central Bank — History, Role and Functions 42 (2004); Christian Seiler, Das Europäische System der Zentralbanken (ESZB) als Verantwortungsverbund: Systemgebundene Aufgabenerfüllung durch eigenständige Kompetenzträger, 1 Europarecht 52 (2004); Martin Seidel, Im Kompetenzkonflikt: Europäisches System der Zentralbanken (ESZB) versus EZB, 18 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 552 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jean-Victor Louis, The Economic and Monetary Union: Law and Institutions, 41 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 575, 589 (2004); Dietrich Rümker, Auswirkungen des EURO auf den europäischen Finanzmarkt: Währungspolitische und rechtliche Aspekte 5 (1999); Arnull et. al, supra note l, at 534.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheller, supra note 6, at 41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Louis, supra note 7, at 41.

    Google Scholar 

  11. EMI Convergence Report required by Article 109j of the Treaty establishing the European Community, 291–295 (1998); see also Charlotte Gaitanides, Das Recht der Europäischen Zentralbank 41 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kathleen McNamara, Managing the EURO: The European Central Bank, in: The Institutions of the European Union, 164,173 (John Peterson & Michael Shackleton eds., 2002); Otmar Issing, The ECB and the Euro: The first five years 58 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jürgen Hartmann, Das politische System der Europäischen Union 38 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul Craig & Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law, 695 (3d ed., 2003); Amy Verdun, Economic and Monetary Union, in: European Union Politics 320, 326 (Michelle Cini ed., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Treaty Establishing the European Community, Nov. 10, 1997, 1997 O.J. (C340) 113(2) [hereinafter EC Treaty].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chiara Zilioli & Martin Selmayr, The European Central Bank: An independent specialized organization of Community law, 37 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 591–644 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deirdre Curtin, The constitutional structure of the European Union: a Europe of bits and pieces, 30 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 17, 28 (1993); Emile Noel, A new Institutional Balance?, in: Europe after Maastricht 16, 23 (Dehousse ed., 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fabian Amtenbrink & Jakob De Haan, The European Central Bank: An independent specialized organization of Community Law — A Comment, 39 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 65, 67 (2002); Matthias Herdegen, Price stability and Budgetary Restraints in the Economic and Monetary Union: The Law as Guardian of Economic Wisdom, 35 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 9 (1998); Issing, supra note 11, at 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Charlotte Gaitanides, Das Recht der Europäischen Zentralbank 174 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paul Craig & Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law 690 (3d ed., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Arnull et al., supra note 1, at 533.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For an in-depth look at the complex organization of the ECB, David Howarth & Peter Loedel, The European Central Bank — the new European Leviathan ? (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Case C-11/00, Commission v. ECB, 2003 ECR I-7147.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Commission Regulation 1073/99, 1999, O.J. (L 136)1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Commission Regulation 1073/99, 1999, O.J. (L 136) 20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Case C-11/00, Commission v. ECB, 2003 ECR I-7147, para. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Id. at para. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Id. at para 135.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Id. at para 135.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For an overview of the ECB’s participation in the debate see The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Final Report of Working Group VI on Economic Governance, CONV 357/02, 1, 2 (Oct. 21,2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Final Report of Working Group VI on Economic Governance, CONV 357/02, 1, 3 (Oct. 21, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Final Report of Working Group VI on Economic Governance, CONV 357/02, 1, 3 (Oct. 21, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, Dec. 16 2004, 2004 O.J. (C310) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 57.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Central Banks and Financial Stability: Exploring a Land in Between, in: The Transformation of the European financial system 269, 271 (Vitor Gaspar et al. eds., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 62.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 61.

    Google Scholar 

  39. The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 61.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, The Euro and its Central bank 27 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. The European Constitution and the ECB, ECB Monthly Bulletin, August 2004, at 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Axel A. Weber, Stabilität bewahren, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 16 2004, at 2.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Verdun, supra note 13, at 320.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See EC Treaty art. 104; See also Commission Regulation 1466–1467/97 O.J. (L209).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Issing, supra note 11, at 31; Bob Hancké et ed., Flexibilisierung des Stabilitätspaktes, Pro und Contra, 1 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 28 (2003); Otmar Issing, Der Stabilitäts-und Wachstumspakt — unentbehrliches Korrelat zur einheitlichen Geldpolitik, 1 Kreditwesen 15–18 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Verdun, supra note 13, at 320.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See Hugo J. Hahn, Der Stabilitätspakt für die Europäische Währungsunion — Das Einhalten der Defizitobergrenze als stete Rechtspflicht (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Case C-27/04, Commission v. Council, 2004 E.C.R.I-4829.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Presidency Conclusions, Brussels European Council, (March 22–23, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hanspeter K. Scheller, The European Central Bank 125 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Armin von Bogdandy, Europäische Prinzipienlehre, in: Europäisches Verfassungsrecht 178 (Armin von Bogdandy ed., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schioppa, supra note 42, at 32.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Id.; Scheller, supra note 52; Laurence W. Gormley, European Monetary Union and the Democratic Principle (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Legitimacy claims are an inherent element of democratic rule, Christian Joerges, Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance, in: Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism 339, 373 (Christian Joerges et al. eds., 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  55. To follow the debate see Magnette, supra note 4; Charlotte Gaitanides, Das Recht der Europäischen Zentralbank 199 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Verdun, supra note 13, at 326; Laurence Gormley & Jakob de Haan, The Democratic Deficit of the European Central Bank, 21 Eur. L. Rep. 95 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. Ceasar, Central banks and governments: issues, traditions, lessions, 2 Financial History Review 124 (1995). And regarding the historical role of central banks in general: Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Central Banks and Financial Stability: Exploring a Land in Between, in: The Transformation of the European financial system, 269, 275 (Vitor Gaspar et al. eds., 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Arnullet al, supra note 1, at 535.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ines Dernedde, Autonomie der Europäischen Zentralbank 197 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mathias Herdegen, Price stability and budgetary restraints in the Economic and Monetary Union: The law as guardian of economic wisdom, 35 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 9 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. See Magnette, supra note 4, at 328.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Issing, supra note 11, at 58.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Scheller, supra note 6.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Joshua Cohen, Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy, in: Democracy and Difference 95, 99 (Seyla Benhabib ed., 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. M. Bessette, Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government, in: How Democratic is the Constitution? (Robert Goldwin & William Shambra eds., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Seyla Benhabib ed., 1996); Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (James Bohman & William Rehg eds., 1997); Deliberative Democracy (Jon Elster ed., 1998); Deliberative Politics, Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (Stephen Macedo ed., 1999); Debating Deliberative Democracy (James S. Fishkin & Peter Laslett eds., 2003); Jürgen Habermas, Faktizität und Geltung (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  67. For an in-depth view see Timo Tohidipur, Deliberative Rechtstheorie, in: Neue Theorien des Rechts (Ralph Christensen et al.eds., 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  68. This idea was heavily criticized, see Michael Walzer, Deliberation...and what else?, in: Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement 58–69 (Stephen Macedo ed., 1999); Frank I. Michelmann, How can the People ever make the laws? A critique of deliberative democracy, in: Deliberative Democracy 145–171 (James Bohman & William Rehg eds., 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  69. EU Committees: the evolution of unforeseen institutional actors in European product regulation (Christian Joerges & Ellen Vos eds., 1999); Das Ausschußwesen der Europäischen Union: Praxis der Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt und ihre rechtliche Verfassung (Christian Joerges & Josef Falke eds., 2000); Good Governance in Europe’s integrated market (Christian Joerges ed., 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  70. The critique of this model of deliberative supranationalism is verbalized by Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Deliberativer Supranationalismus, 6 Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 185–242 (1999); On the political theory of the Europolity, in: Making the European Polity 5982-83 (Erik Oddvar Erikson ed., 2005) and to follow the ongoing debate Christian Joerges, Deliberative Supranationalism — Two Defences, 8 European L. J. 13372-151 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Oliver Gerstenberg, Law’s Polyarchy: A Comment on Cohen and Sabel, in: Private governance, democratic constitutionalism and supranationalism, 31 (Christian Joerges and Oliver Gerstenberg eds., 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Joerges, supra note 72, at 142.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Christian Joerges & Jürgen Neyer, From intergovernmental bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology, 3 European L. J. 273–291 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Louis, supra note 7, at 41.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hanspeter K. Scheller, The European Central bank — History, role and functions 130 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Louis, supra note 7, at 41.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Massimo La Torre, Legitimacy for a Supranational European Political Order — Derivative, Regulatory or Deliberative? 15 Ratio Juris 63, 82 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Id. at 64 who defines the deliberative idea as a reshaped regulatory model. See also: Christoph Knill & Andrea Lenschow, Modes of Regulation in the Governance of the European Union: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation, 7 European Integration online Papers 1 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Renaud Dehousse, European Institutional Architecture after Amsterdam: Parliamentary System or Regulatory Structure?, 35 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 595, 626 (1998); Ines Dernedde, Autonomie der Europäischen Zentralbank 313 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Philipp Dann, European Parliament and Executive Federalism: Approaching a Parliament in a Semi-Parliamentary Democracy, 9 Eur. L. J. 551 (2003) (using the term “semi-parliamentary” democracy in this context).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Kathleen McNamara, Managing the EURO: The European Central Bank, in: The Institutions of the European Union 164, 181 (John Peterson & Michael Shackleton ed., 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Philipp Dann Michał Rynkowski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Max-Planck-Gessellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tohidipur, T. (2006). The Emperor’s New Clothes: The ECB and the New Institutional Concept. In: Dann, P., Rynkowski, M. (eds) The Unity of the European Constitution. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37721-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics