Zusammenfassung
Bei der Entwicklung von multimedialen Lernumgebungen sind vielfältige didaktische Entscheidungen zu treffen. Je nach Art der zu vermittelnden Lerninhalte und je nach vorliegenden Rahmenbedingungen ist die für den jeweiligen Zweck bestgeeignete Lernumgebung zu konzipieren. Instruktionsdesign als wissenschaftliche Disziplin beinhaltet technologische Aussagen zur effektiven Gestaltung von Lernumgebungen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
AlDiban, S., & Seel, N. (1999). Evaluation als Forschungsaufgabe von Instruktionsdesign. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 27(1), 29.-60.
Alisch, L.-M. (1995). Grundlagenanalyse der Pädagogik als strenge praktische Wissenschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology. (pp. 115.-141). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32.-41.
Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of Science: From Problem to Theory (revised edition. ed. Vol. vol. 1). New Brunswick, London.
Case, R. (1978). A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 48, 439.-463.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991a). Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology, January, 7.-11.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, May, 34.-40.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project. Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
de Crook, M. B. M., Paas, F., Schlanbusch, H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). ADAPTIT: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 47.-58.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. New York: HarperCollins/College Publishers.
Fischer, F., Bouillion, L., Mandl, H., & Gomez, L. (2003). Scientific principles in Pasteur’s quadrant: integrating goals of understandig and use in learning enviroments research. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 493.-502). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. 4. Aufl.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1987). Principles of instructional design (3 ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16.-25). Upper Saddle River, NJ/Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115.-140). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Herrmann, T. (1994). Forschungsprogramme. In T. Herrmann & W. H. Tack (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich B, Serie I, Bd. I: Methodologische Grundlagen der Psychologie (S. 251.-294). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215.-239). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Krapp, A., & Heiland, A. (Hrsg.). (1981). Theorieanwendung und rationales Handeln (Bd. 4). Braunschweig: TU Braunschweig.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279.-333). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Merrill, M. D. (1999). Instructional transaction theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design – Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (S. 397.-424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., Jones, M. J., & Hancock, S. W. (1991). Instructional transaction theory: Transaction shells.
Mischo, C., & Rheinberg, F. (1995). Erziehungsziele von Lehrern und individuelle Bezugsnormen der Leistungsbewertung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 9(3/4), 139.-151.
Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (S. 241.-267). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Reigeluth, C., M. (Ed.). (1987). Instructional theories in action. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Reimann, P. (1997). Lernprozesse beim Wissenserwerb aus Beispielen. Analyse, Modellierung, Förderung. Bern: Hans Huber.
Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen. Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47(1), 78.-92.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 51.-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503.-529). San Diego, San Francisco, New York: Academic Press.
Romiszowski, A. J. (1999). The development of physical skills: Introduction zin the psychomotor domain. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 457.-481). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Sander, E. (1986). Lernhierarchien und kognitive Lernförderung. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich: Hogrefe.
Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: a new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribner.
Schank, R. C. (1998). Tell me a story. Narrative and intelligence (2nd printing). Evanston, Illinois: Nortwestern University Press.
Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world-class e-learning. New York, Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design .- Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161.-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexible adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design .- Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183.-213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.
Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O.-C. (1980). The teaching of concepts. A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 55.-70.
Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficieny. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 87.-105.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-Model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 39.-64.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2005). The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 71.-93). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Die Konzeption von E-Learning: Wissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Befunde. In: Kompendium multimediales Lernen. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37226-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37226-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37225-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37226-4
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)