Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Kompendium multimediales Lernen pp 17–40Cite as

Die Konzeption von E-Learning: Wissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Befunde

  • Chapter

  • 21k Accesses

Part of the book series: X.media.press ((XMEDIAP))

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Entwicklung von multimedialen Lernumgebungen sind vielfältige didaktische Entscheidungen zu treffen. Je nach Art der zu vermittelnden Lerninhalte und je nach vorliegenden Rahmenbedingungen ist die für den jeweiligen Zweck bestgeeignete Lernumgebung zu konzipieren. Instruktionsdesign als wissenschaftliche Disziplin beinhaltet technologische Aussagen zur effektiven Gestaltung von Lernumgebungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • AlDiban, S., & Seel, N. (1999). Evaluation als Forschungsaufgabe von Instruktionsdesign. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 27(1), 29.-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alisch, L.-M. (1995). Grundlagenanalyse der Pädagogik als strenge praktische Wissenschaft. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology. (pp. 115.-141). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32.-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of Science: From Problem to Theory (revised edition. ed. Vol. vol. 1). New Brunswick, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1978). A developmentally based theory and technology of instruction. Review of Educational Research, 48, 439.-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991a). Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology, January, 7.-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, May, 34.-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project. Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Crook, M. B. M., Paas, F., Schlanbusch, H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). ADAPTIT: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 47.-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. New York: HarperCollins/College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bouillion, L., Mandl, H., & Gomez, L. (2003). Scientific principles in Pasteur’s quadrant: integrating goals of understandig and use in learning enviroments research. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 493.-502). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. 4. Aufl.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1987). Principles of instructional design (3 ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16.-25). Upper Saddle River, NJ/Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115.-140). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (1994). Forschungsprogramme. In T. Herrmann & W. H. Tack (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich B, Serie I, Bd. I: Methodologische Grundlagen der Psychologie (S. 251.-294). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215.-239). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., & Heiland, A. (Hrsg.). (1981). Theorieanwendung und rationales Handeln (Bd. 4). Braunschweig: TU Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279.-333). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1999). Instructional transaction theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design – Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (S. 397.-424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D., Li, Z., Jones, M. J., & Hancock, S. W. (1991). Instructional transaction theory: Transaction shells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischo, C., & Rheinberg, F. (1995). Erziehungsziele von Lehrern und individuelle Bezugsnormen der Leistungsbewertung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 9(3/4), 139.-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (S. 241.-267). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C., M. (Ed.). (1987). Instructional theories in action. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P. (1997). Lernprozesse beim Wissenserwerb aus Beispielen. Analyse, Modellierung, Förderung. Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen. Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47(1), 78.-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 51.-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Rollett, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503.-529). San Diego, San Francisco, New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1999). The development of physical skills: Introduction zin the psychomotor domain. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 457.-481). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, E. (1986). Lernhierarchien und kognitive Lernförderung. Göttingen, Toronto, Zürich: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: a new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1998). Tell me a story. Narrative and intelligence (2nd printing). Evanston, Illinois: Nortwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world-class e-learning. New York, Chicago: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design .- Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161.-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexible adaptive instructional designs. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design .- Theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 183.-213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Vic: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O.-C. (1980). The teaching of concepts. A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 55.-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F. G. W. C., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: effects of worked examples on training efficieny. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 87.-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-Model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 39.-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2005). The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 71.-93). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Die Konzeption von E-Learning: Wissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Befunde. In: Kompendium multimediales Lernen. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37226-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation