Skip to main content

Landscape goods and services related to forestry land use

  • Chapter

Abstract

It has been argued by Mather (1992) that forestry has passed through three distinct historic phases of development: a pre-industrial phase; an industrial phase; and a post-industrial phase. In the pre-industrial phase, forestry was principally but not exclusively a provider of local livelihoods, providing a wide range of timber and non-timber products. In Western Europe this role largely ceased by the late 19th century, although in post-communist countries there has been something of a resurgence of this function in newly privatised forest holdings, which comprise a significant part of the forest estate. Over the 18th and 19th century, the growth of imperial powers and the beginnings of the industrial revolution created a more mono-functional demand for specific types of timber, initially for shipbuilding or charcoal manufacture, but also for building material and paper manufacture. This has been termed the industrial phase. Although this monofunctional industrial style of forestry remains to some extent in some parts of Europe, the most recent post-industrial phase has created more varied styles of forestry with a stronger amenity or post-productivist function (Mather 2001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appleton J (1996) The experience of landscape, revised edition, Wiley: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Agricultural Organisations in the European Union & General Committee for Agricultural Cooperation in the European Union 1999, The European model of agriculture: the way ahead, Pr(99)88F1, P(99)89F1 Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J, Wibberley G (1977) Planning and the rural environment, Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake L (1992) The Non-Market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics 19: 351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S (2000) The appraisal of rural development forestry in Scotland, unpublished PhD thesis, Dept of Agriculture and forestry, University of Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands B, Wiersum F (2003) Forestry and rural development in Europe, Wageningen UR: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands B, O’ Leary T (2002) The myth of forests: a reflection on the variety of rural identities in Europe and the role of forests in it. In: Wiersum F, Elands B (eds) The changing role of forestry in Europe: perspectives for rural development, Wageningen: WUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands BHM, Wiersum KF (2003) Forestry and rural development in Europe: research results and policy implications of a comparative European study, WAU: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HW, Fowler FG (eds) (1964) Concise Oxford English Dictionary, OUP: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology, Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Weber M (eds) (1998) Mountian forestry in Europe: evaluation of silvicultural and policy means, BOKU: Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahame K (1908) The wind in the willows, Methuen: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F (1976) Social limits to growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins WG (1955) The making of the English landscape, Hodder and Stoughton: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jáger L (ed) (2005) Forest sector entrepreneurship in Europe: country studies, Volumes 1 & 2, Acta Silvatica and Lignaria Hungarica, Special Edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch N, Kennedy JJ (2004) Viewing and managing natural resources as human-ecosystem relationships. Forest Policy and Economics 6: 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A (2004) Social values of forests. In: Burley J et al. (eds) Encyclopaedia of forest sciences, Vol 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1126–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantau U et al. (2001) Recreational and environmental markets for forest enterprises, CABI Books: Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather A (1992) The forest transition. Area 24: 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather A (2001) Forests of Consumption: postproductivism, postmaterialism and the postindustrial forest. Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien E (2005) Social and cultural values of trees and woodlands in northwest and south east England. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 79: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakenham T (2002) Remarkable trees of the world, Weidenfeld and Nicholson: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakenham T (2003) Meetings with remarkable trees, Weidenfeld and Nicholson: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen O (1997) A framework for assessing the total value of forests in Finland. Scandinavian Forest Economics 36: 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama S (1995) Landscape and Memory, Simon and Shuster, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee B (2005) The economics of access. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 99: 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (1973) The Country and the City, Chatto & Windus, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis K, Garrod G, Scarpa R, Powe N, Lovett A, Bateman I, Hanley N, Macmillan D (2003) The social and economic benefits of forests in Great Britain, Newcastle: CREAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland Trust (2004) Space for people: targeting action for woodland access, Woodland Trust: Grantham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slee, B. (2007). Landscape goods and services related to forestry land use. In: Mander, Ü., Wiggering, H., Helming, K. (eds) Multifunctional Land Use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics