Skip to main content

Minimal Invasive Navigated Unicondylar Knee Replacement with the DePuy Ci-System

  • Chapter
Book cover Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery
  • 1285 Accesses

Conclusion

Navigated minimally invasive unicondylar replacement with specific instruments leads to a superior accuracy in reconstruction of limb alignment. Additional and valuable information is provided to the surgeon intra-operatvely in order to achieve the planned leg- and component alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH, Joslin CC (2002) A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 667–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari S, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1997) St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years. Acta Orthop Scand 68: 430–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, Reinschmidt C, Romagnoli S (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13: 551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11: 782–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 392 272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Engh GA, McAuley JP (1999) Unicondylar arthroplasty: an option for high-demand patients with gonarthrosis. Instr Course Lect 48: 143–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE (2003) Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18: 2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs S, Rolauffs B, Plaumann T, Tibesku CO, Rosenbaum D (2005) Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13: 179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT (1993) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with longterm follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 286: 154–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11: 40–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keene G, Simpson D, Kalairajah Y (2006) Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 44–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop 221: 278–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laskin RS (2001) Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. Clin Orthop 392: 267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lootvoet L, Burton P, Himmer O, Pilot L, Ghosez JP (1997) A unicompartment knee prosthesis: the effect of the positioning of the tibial plate on the functional results. Acta Orthop Belg 63: 94–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8: 20–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riebel GD, Werner FW, Ayers DC, Bromka J, Murray DG (1995) Early failure of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10: 615–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15: 17–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stockelman RE, Pohl KP (1991) The long-term efficacy of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 271: 88–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tabor OB, Jr., Tabor OB (1998) Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13: 373–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanavalee A, Choi YJ, Tria AJ (2005) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: past and present. Orthopedics 28:1423–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG (1995) Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2-to 5-year follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplasty 10: 764–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bäthis, H., Perlick, L., Lüring, C., Tingart, M., Grifka, J. (2007). Minimal Invasive Navigated Unicondylar Knee Replacement with the DePuy Ci-System. In: Stiehl, J.B., Konermann, W.H., Haaker, R.G., DiGioia, A.M. (eds) Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36691-1_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36691-1_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36691-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics