Advertisement

Learning as Abductive Deliberations

  • Budhitama Subagdja
  • Iyad Rahwan
  • Liz Sonenberg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4099)

Abstract

This paper explains an architecture for a BDI agent that can learn based on its own experience. The learning is conducted through explicit procedural knowledge or plans in a goal-directed manner. The learning is described by encoding abductions within the deliberation processes. With this model, the agent is capable of modifying its own plans on the run. We demonstrate that by abducing some complex structures of plan, the agent can also acquire complex structures of knowledge about its interaction with the environment.

Keywords

Plan Body Belief State Composite Action Learn Plan Deliberation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cindy Olivia, C.F.E., Chang, C.-F., Ghose, A.K.: Case-based BDI agents: an effective approach for intelligent search on the world wide web. In: Proceedings of the AAAI-99 Spring Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace Stanford University, USA (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208 (1971)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hernandez, A.G., Segrouchini, A.E., Soldano, H.: BDI multiagent learning based on first-order induction of logical decision trees. In: Zhong, S.O.N., Liu, J., Bradshaw, J. (eds.) Intelligent Agent Technology: Research and Development, World Scientific, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ingrand, F., Georgeff, M., Rao, A.: An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control. IEEE Expert 7(6), 34–44 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ingrand, F.F., Georgeff, M.P.: Managing deliberation and reasoning in real-time AI systems. In: Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, San Diego, California (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magnani, L.: Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norling, E.: Learning to notice: Adaptive models of human operators. In: Second International Workshop on Learning Agents, Montreal (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norling, E.: Folk psychology for human modelling: Extending the BDI paradigm. In: Proc. of the Third Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York (July 2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao, A.S.: A unified view of plans as recipes. In: Contemporary Action Theory, Kluwer Academic, Netherlands (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI agents: From theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sioutis, C., Ichalkaranje, N.: Cognitive hybrid reasoning intelligence agent system. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3682, pp. 838–843. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Budhitama Subagdja
    • 1
  • Iyad Rahwan
    • 2
  • Liz Sonenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Melbourne 
  2. 2.Institute of InformaticsThe British University in Dubai, (Fellow) School of Informatics, University of EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations