Abstract
In this chapter, we present an extension of the wrapper approach applied to the predictor. The originality is to use the area under the training lift curve as a criterion of feature set optimality and to preprocess the numeric variables with a new optimal discretization method. The method is experimented on the NIPS 2003 datasets both as a wrapper and as a filter for multi-layer perceptron.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Boullé. A bayesian approach for supervized discretization. In Proceedings of the Data Mining 2004 Conference. WIT Press, 2004a.
M. Boullé. MODL: une méthode quasi-optimale de discrétisation supervisée. Technical Report, NT/FTR&D/84444, France Telecom R&D, Lannion, France, 2004b.
J. Dougherty, R. Kohavi, and M. Sahami. Supervised and unsupervised discretization of continuous features. In Proceedings 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 194–202. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
I. Guyon. Design of experiments of the NIPS 2003 variable selection benchmark. http://www.nipsfsc.ecs.soton.ac.uk/papers/datasets.pdf, 2003.
D.F. Hand and K.S. Yu. Idiot’s bayes-not so stupid after all? International Statistical Review, 69(3):385–398, 2001.
C.N. Hsu, H.J. Huang, and T.T. Wong. Implications of the dirichlet assumption for discretization of continuous variables in nave bayesian classifiers. Machine Learning, 53(3):235–263, 2002.
R. Kohavi and G.H. John. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence, 1997.
P. Langley and S. Sage. Induction of selective bayesian classifiers. In Proceedings 10th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufman, 1994.
F. Provost, T. Fawcett, and R. Kohavi. The case against accuracy estimation for comparing induction algorithms. In Proceedings Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
I.H. Witten and E. Franck. Data Mining. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
Y. Yang and G.I. Webb. A comparative study of discretization methods for navebayes classifiers. In Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boullé, M. (2006). An Enhanced Selective Naïve Bayes Method with Optimal Discretization. In: Guyon, I., Nikravesh, M., Gunn, S., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Feature Extraction. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 207. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35487-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35488-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)