• Klaus HenleEmail author
  • Irene Ring
  • Reinhard A. Klenke
  • Andreas Kranz
  • Niels Jepsen
  • Felix Rauschmayer
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Wildlife captures the imagination of humans. The image of wildlife and human-wildlife conflicts differs among people. Therefore, it is essential in a book that addresses human-wildlife conflicts to first clarify what we understand by “wildlife” and “human-wildlife conflicts”. In the broadest sense, all wild, undomesticated animals and plants belong to wildlife but most frequently the term refers to medium to large-sized terrestrial vertebrates that are hunted by humans as a resource, trophy, or because they compete with humans for food or space. This is particularly the case when talking about human-wildlife conflicts and we use the word wildlife in this sense throughout this book.


Wild Boar Wildlife Management Brown Bear Wildlife Species Grey Seal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was financed by the EU 5th Framework Program (5th FP) Project “FRAP” (Development of a procedural Framework for Action Plans to Reconcile conflicts between large vertebrate conservation and the use of biological resources: fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case), contract number EVK 2-CT-2002-00142-FRAP.


  1. Anonymus (2006) Godspeed Bruno: brown bear meets a tragic end.,1518,423629,00.html. Accessed 01 Dec 2008
  2. Arner DH, Dubose JS (1982) The impact of the beaver on the environment and economics in southeastern United States. Trans Int Congr Game Biol 14:241–247Google Scholar
  3. Baier H, Erdmann F, Holz R, Waterstraat A (2006) Freiraum und naturschutz. Die Wirkungen von Störungen und Zerschneidungen in der Landschaft, Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown PJ (2009) Introduction: perspectives on the past and future of human dimensions of fish and wildlife. In: Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Brown PJ, Decker DJ, Duke EA (eds) Wildlife and society—the science of human dimensions. Island Press, Washington, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  5. Callicott JB (1998) The great new wilderness debate. University of Georgia Press, Athens. Accessed 18 Feb 2009
  6. Carson RL (1962) Silent spring. Riverside Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Caughley G, Sinclair ARE (1994) Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell Science, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Conover M (2002) Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife damage management. Lewis Publishers (CRC Press LLC), Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. EC (European Commission) (2006) Communication from the commission: halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010—and beyond. Sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. COM/2006/216 final, Brussels, 22 May 2006. Accessed 14 Dec 2008
  10. Enserink M, Vogel G (2006) Wildlife conservation: the carnivore comeback. Science 314(5800):746–749. doi: 10.1126/science.314.5800.746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fascione N, Delach A, Smith M (2004) People and predators—from conflict to coexistence. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hadidian J, Hodge G, Grandy J (eds) (1997) Wild neighbors: the humane approach to living with wildlife. The Humane Society of the United States and Fulcrum Publishing, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hygnstrom SE, Timm RM, Larson GE (eds) (1994) Prevention and control of wildlife damage. Univ Nebr Coop, Extension, USDA-APHIS-Animal damage control, and great plains agricultural council wildlife committee. Nebraska Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, vol 2. p 822. or Accessed 14 Dec 2008
  14. Jentsch A, Wittmer H, Jax K, Ring I, Henle K (2003) Biodiversity. Emerging issues for linking natural and social sciences. GAIA 12(2):121–128Google Scholar
  15. Johannesen AB (2007) Protected area, wildlife conservation, and local welfare. Ecol Econ 62:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleinschmidt O (1937) Die singvögel der heimat. Quelle & Meyer, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  17. Konold W (2004) Traditionen und trends im naturschutz. Ber ANL 28:5–15Google Scholar
  18. Kruuk H (2002) Hunter and hunted. Relationships between carnivores and people. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leopold AA (1933) Game management. Charles Scribner’s, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Leopold AA (1949) A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Lutcavage ME, Plotkin P, Witherington B, Lutz PL (1997) Human impact on sea turtle survival. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 387–409Google Scholar
  22. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Brown PJ, Decker DJ, Duke EA (2009) Wildlife and society—the science of human dimensions. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Maehr D, Noss R, Larkin J (2001) Large mammal restoration—ecological and sociological challenges in the 21st century. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Piatt JF, Nettleship DN (1987) Incidental catch of marine birds and mammals in fishing nets off Newfoundland, Canada. Mar Pollut Bull 18:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO (eds) (1997) Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Read AJ, Drinker P, Northridge S (2006) Bycatch of marine mammals in U.S. and global fisheries. Cons Biol 20:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ring I (2009) Toward a framework for integrating human dimensions in wildlife management. In: Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ, Brown PJ, Decker DJ, Duke EA (eds) Wildlife and society—the science of human dimensions. Island Press, Washington, pp 90–103Google Scholar
  29. Treves A, Wallace RB, Naughton-Treves L, Morales A (2006) Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: a review. Hum Dimen Wildlife 11:383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Unsworth RE, Petersen TB (not dated) A manual for conducting natural resource damage assessment: the role of economics. Industrial Economics Inc., Cambridge, MA. Accessed 13 Dec 2008
  31. Westley F, Miller P (2003) Experiments in consilience—integrating social and scientific responses to save endangered species. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. White RM, Fischer A, Marshall K, Travis JMJ, Webb TJ, di Falco S, Redpath SM, van der Wal R (2009) Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. Land Use Policy 26(2):242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson EO (ed) (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy of Sciences/Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A (2005) People and wildlife. Conflict or coexistence? Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Henle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Irene Ring
    • 2
  • Reinhard A. Klenke
    • 1
  • Andreas Kranz
    • 3
    • 6
  • Niels Jepsen
    • 4
  • Felix Rauschmayer
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Conservation BiologyUFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game ManagementUniversity of Natural Resources and Life SciencesViennaAustria
  4. 4.Section of Freshwater Fisheries Ecology, National Institute of Aquatic ResourcesTechnical University of DenmarkSilkeborgDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Environmental PoliticsUFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  6. 6.LKA-Kranz-Consulting Engineers for Wildlife Ecology and Nature ConservationGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations