Advertisement

Module 8: Management and Viability of Target Species: Modeling and Monitoring

  • Karin FrankEmail author
  • Peter M. Alberti
  • Klaus Henle
  • Reinhard Klenke
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

One way to mitigate conflicts between species protection and economic damage is population management, i.e. active control of the target species. Any strategy of population control, however, has to meet the constraint that the population stays viable. This chapter presents a framework for modelling and monitoring the viability of populations under active control and for assessing chances and risks of management scenarios already in advance. It accounts for the demographic parameters in the population and the management measure of interest. It highlights that active control is only recommended in cases where population growth rate is above 1.0. Management ought to be adaptive (activity only above a certain threshold) and differentiate between breeders and non-breeders. This requires an appropriate monitoring. Mean age was found to be a useful indicator for population monitoring. The chapter also provides a list of free and commercial software for population viability analysis and monitoring.

References

  1. Beissinger SR, McCullough DR (eds) (2002) Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Brook BW, Burgman MA, Frankham R (2000a) Differences and congruencies between PVA packages: the importance of sex ratio for predictions of extinction risk. Conservation Ecology 4(1):6; http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art6/. Accessed 26 September 2008
  3. Brook BW, O’grady JJ, Chapman AP, Burgman MA, Akcakaya HR, Frankham R (2000b) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385–387. doi: 10.1038/35006050 Accessed 23 March 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Caughley G, Sinclair ARE (1994) Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell Science, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooperrider AY, Boyd RJ, Stuart HR (1986) Inventory and monitoring of wildlife habitat. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Service Centre, DenverGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerrodette T (1987) A power analysis for detecting trends. Ecology 68:1364–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerrodette T (1993) Trends: software for a power analysis of linear regression. Wildl Soc Bull 21:515–516Google Scholar
  9. Jepsen N, Olesen T (2012) Cormorants in Denmark—reinforced management and scientific evidence. In: Klenke R, Ring I, Kranz A, Jepsen N, Rauschmayer F, Henle K (eds) Human-wildlife conflicts in Europe—fisheries and fish-eating vertebrates as a model case. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Simons TR, Farnsworth GL, Bailey LL, Sauer JR (2002) Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Possingham HP, Lindenmayer DB, McCarthy MA (2001) Population viability analysis. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol 4. Academic Press, New York, pp. 831–843Google Scholar
  12. Schmeller D (2008) Biodiversity Monitoring. Biodivers Conserv, 17 (Special Issue)Google Scholar
  13. Ter Braak CJF, van Strien AJ, Meijer R, Verstrael TJ (1994) Analysis of monitoring data with many missing values: which method? In: Hagemeijer EJM, Verstrael TJ (eds) Bird numbers 1992. distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen & SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp 663–673Google Scholar
  14. van Strien AJ, Pannekoek J, Hagemeijer W, Verstrael TJ (2004) A loglinear Poisson regression method analyse bird monitoring data. In: Anselin A (ed) Bird numbers 1995. In: Proceedings of the international conference 13th meeting of the European bird census council, Pärnu, Estonia. Bird Census News 13 (2000):33–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karin Frank
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter M. Alberti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus Henle
    • 3
  • Reinhard Klenke
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Ecological ModellingUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Building and Energy TechniquesUniversity of Applied SciencesErfurtGermany
  3. 3.Department of Conservation BiologyUFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations