Skip to main content

Towards Time-Stable and Accurate LES on Unstructured Grids

  • Conference paper
Complex Effects in Large Eddy Simulations

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 56))

Abstract

Control-volume (cv) and node-based (cell-vertex) finite volume discretizations of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are compared in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and stability using the inviscid Taylor vortex problem. An energy estimate is shown to exist for both formulations, and stable convective boundary conditions are formulated using the simultaneous approximation term (SAT) method. Numerical experiments show the node-based formulation to be generally superior on both structured Cartesian and unstructured triangular grids, displaying consistent error levels and nearly second-order rates of L 2 velocity error reduction. The cv-formulation, however, out-performs the node-based for the case of Cartesian grids when the Taylor vortices do not cut the boundary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Mittal and P. Moin. Suitability of upwind-biased finite difference schemes for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. AIAA J. 35(8):1415, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. F.H. Harlow and J.E. Welch. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surfaces. Phys. Fluids 8:2182, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Perot. Conservation properties of unstructured staggered mesh schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 159:58–89, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Mahesh, G. Constantinescu, and P. Moin. A numerical method for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 197:215–240, 2004.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Ham and G. Iaccarino. Energy conservation in collocated discretization schemes on unstructured meshes. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs Stanford University, Stanford, California 3–14, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.H. Carpenter, D. Gottlieb, and S. Abarbanel. Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: Methodology and application to high-order compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 111(2), 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P.D. Lax and R.D. Richtmyer. Survey of the Stability of Linear Finite difference Equations. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math. IX, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.H. Carpenter, D. Gottlieb, and S. Abarbanel. The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 108(2), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.-O. Kreiss and G. Scherer. Finite element and finite difference methods for hyperbolic partial Differential equations. Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations., Academic Press, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Strang. Accurate partial difference methods II. Non-linear problems. Num. Math. 6:37–46, 1964.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. H.-O. Kreiss and L. Wu. On the stability definition of difference approximations for the initial boundary value problems. Appl. Num. Math. 12:212–227, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Mattsson and J. Nordström. Summation by parts operators for finite difference approximations of second derivatives. J. Comput. Phys. 199(2), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Nordström, K. Forsberg, C. Adamsson, and P. Eliasson. Finite volume methods, unstructured meshes and strict stability for hyperbolic problems. Appl. Num. Math. 45(4), 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss, and J. Oliger. Boundary Procedures for Summation-by-Parts Operators, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Mattsson. Boundary Procedures for Summation-by-Parts Operators. J. Sci. Comput. 18, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ham, F., Mattsson, K., Iaccarino, G., Moin, P. (2007). Towards Time-Stable and Accurate LES on Unstructured Grids. In: Kassinos, S.C., Langer, C.A., Iaccarino, G., Moin, P. (eds) Complex Effects in Large Eddy Simulations. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 56. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34234-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics