Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Antepartale Überwachung

  • Chapter
Die Geburtshilfe

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • ACOG Committee Opinion no 116 (1992) Use of antepartum Doppler for estimating fetal umbilical and uterine artery flow. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 41: 320–322

    Google Scholar 

  • ACOG Techn Bull No 188 (1994) Antepartum fetal surveillance. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 44: 289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACOG Techn Bull No 207 (1995) Fetal heart rate patterns: monitoring, interpretation, and management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 51: 65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACOG Techn Bull, no 187 (1994) Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 44: 173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfirevic Z, Luckas M, Walkinshaw SA, McFarlane M, Curran R (1997) A randomised comparison between amniotic fluid index and maximum pool depth in the monitoring of post-term pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104: 207–211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (1995) Doppler ultrasonography in high risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172: 179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (1996) The current status of Doppler sonography in obstetrics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 8: 114–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anyaegbunam A, Brustman L, Divon M, Langer O (1986) The significance of antepartum variable decelerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 707–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babazadeh R, Abdali K, Lotfalizadeh M, Tabatabaie HR, Kaviani M (2005) Diurnall nonstress test variations in the human fetus at risk. Int. Gynaecol Obstet. 90: 189–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badalian SS, Chao CR, Fox HE, Timor-Tritsch IE (1993) Fetal breathing related nasal fluid velocity in uncomplicated pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 563–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Baschat AA, Guclu S, Kush ML, Gembruch U, Weiner CP, Harman CR (2004) Venous Doppler in prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses with elevated placental blood flow resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 191: 277–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayerische Perinatalerhebung (2000) BAQ-Jahresbericht 2000, Kommission für Perinatologie und Neonatologie, Bayerische Landesärztekammer und Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns. Zauner, Dachau

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayerische Perinatalerhebung (2004) BAQ-Jahresbericht 2004. http://www.baq-bayern.de/downloads/files/16_1_2004_online.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois FJ, Thiagarajah S, Harbert GN (1984) The significance of fetal heart rate decelerations during nonstress testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150: 213–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VA, Sauer RS, Parson RJ, Duncan SLB, Cooke ID (1982) The value of antenatal carditocography in the management of high risk pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 716–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain PF, Manning MD, Morrison MB, Harman CR, Lange IR (1984) Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. II. The realtionship of increased amniotic fluid to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 150: 250–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SL, Sabey P, Jolley K (1989) Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160: 694–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daffos F, Capella-Pavlovsky M, Forestier F (1983) A new procedure of fetal blood sampling in utero: preliminary results of 53 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 985–987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes GS, Lobb M, Moulden M, Redman CWG, Wheeler T (1992a) Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99: 791–797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG (1992b) Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor. Obstet Gynecol 80: 673–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dèlia A, Pighetti M, Vanacore F, Fabbrocini G, Arpaia L (2005) Vibroacoustic stimulation in normal term human pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 81: 449–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, Castillo RA (1990) The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and Doppler velocimetry in screening a general high-risk population. Am J Obstet 163: 1040–1048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Divon MY (1996) Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: clinical utility in high-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 10–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Druzin ML, Grataco’s J, Keegan KA, Paul RH (1981) Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. VIII. The significance of fetal bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 194–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • East CE, Smyth R, Leader LR, Henshall NE, Colditz PB, Tan KH (2005) Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreasuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18: CD004664

    Google Scholar 

  • Ek S, Andersson A, Johansson A, Kublicas M (2005) Oligohydramnios in uncomplicated pregnancies beyond 40 completed weeks. A prospective, randomised, pilot study on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 20: 182–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hamedi A, Shillito J, Simpson NA, Walker JJ (2005) A prospective analysis of the role of uterine artery Doppler waveform notching in the assessment of at-risk pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy 24: 137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duenhoelter JH, Whalley PJ, MacDonald PC (1976) An analysis of the utility of plasma immunoreactive estrogen measurements in determining delivery time of gravidas with a fetus considered at high risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 889–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farmakides G, Weiner Z (1995) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38: 112–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Figueras F, Lanna M, Palacio M, Zamora L, Puerto B, Coll O, Cararach V, Vanrell JA (2004) Middle cerebral artey Doppler indices at different sites: prediction of umbilical cord gases in prolonged pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 24: 529–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer WM (1981) Grundlagen und klinische Wertigkeit der Kardiotokographie. In: Fischer WM (Hrsg) Kardiotokographie. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 91–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald DE, Drumm JE (1977) Noninvasive measurement of the fetal circulation using ultrasound:a new method. BMJ 2: 1450–1451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florido J, Cortes, E, Gutierrez M, Soto VM, Miranda MT, Navarrete L (2005) Analysis of fetal breathing movements at 39–38 weeks of gestation. J Peronat Med. 33: 38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn AM, Kelly J, Mansfield H, Needham P, O’Connor M, Viegas O (1982) A randomized controlled trial of non-stress-antepartum cardiotocography. BrJ Obstet Gynaecol 89: 427–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn AM, Kelly J, Matthews K, O’Connor M, Viegas O (1982) Predictive value of, and observer variability in, several ways of reporting antepartum cardiotocographs. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 434–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RK (1975) The use of the oxytocin challenge test for antepartum clinical evaluation of uteroplacental respiratory function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121: 481–489

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RK (1982) Contraction stress testing for primary fetal surveillance in patients with high risk for placental insufficiency. Clin Perinat 9: 265–270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W (1982) A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus nonstress test for primary surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 778–781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier RJ, Evertson LR, Paul RH (1979) Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. 2. Intrapartum fetal heart rate observation and newborn outcome following a positive contraction stress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 34–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson AG, Wallace DM, Stiller RJ, Paul D, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ (1987) Doppler evaluation of umbilical venous and arterial flow in the second and third trimester of normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 70: 622–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J (1995) Kineto-Kardiotokographie:automatische Detektion der fetalen Bewegungsaktivität als integraler Bestandteil antepartualer CTG-Registrierungen und ihre Bedeutung für die fetale Zustandsdiagnostik. Habilitationsschrift, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J, Schelling M, Kolben M, Schneider KTM (1998) Referenzkurven für das fetale Bewegungsprofil. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 58: 355–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J, Schneider KTM (1994) Fetale Verhaltenszustände und Bewegungsaktivität. Gynäkologe 27: 136–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J, Schneider KTM (1996) Diagnostik der fetalen Bewegungsaktivität, fetaler Stimulationstests und der Komplexitätsanalyse des fetalen EKGs als Ergänzung der intrapartalen CTG-Überwachung. Gynäkologe 29: 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J, Schneider KTM, Möhrling D, Wilhelm O, Graeff H (1993) Dopplersonographie, Kineto-Kardiotokographie und fetale Stimulationstests bei Risikoschwangerschaften. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 33(Suppl 1): 309–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnirs J, Schraag M (1992) Kineto-Kardiotokographie. Ein neues Verfahren zur automatischen Detektion dertotalen fetalen Bewegungsaktivität zeitsynchron zum konventionellen Kardiotokogramm. Medizintechnik 112: 209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonser M (1996) Dopplersonographie in der Schwangerenvorsorge. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 200: 69–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Göschen K (1997) Kardiotokographie-Praxis, 5. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Grannum P, Berkowitz RI, Hobbins JC (1979) The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 915–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hage ML (1985) Interpretation of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 470–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG (1976) The evolution of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 310–317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecher K, Campbell S, Doyle P, Harrington K, Nicolaides K (1995) Assessment of fetal compromise by Doppler ultrasound investigation of the fetal circulation. Arterial, intracardiac and venous blood flow velocity studies. Circulation 91: 129–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WC, Moenning RK, Katz M, Kitzmiller JL (1984) Characteristics of uterine activity during the breast stimulation test. Obstet Gynecol 64: 489–492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hon EH (1963) Instrumentation of fetal heart rate and fetal electrocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 86: 772–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hon EH, Hess OW (1957) Instrumentation of fetal electrocardiograhy. Science 125: 553–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins I A, Frieden FJ, Young BK (1991) Variable decelerations in reactive nonstress tests with decreased amnionicfluid index predictfetal compromise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165: 1094–1098

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MJ, Paine LL, Mulder HH, Cezar C, Gregor C, Johnson TRB (1992) Population differences of fetal biophysical and behavioral characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 138–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson TRB (1992) Vibratory acoustic stimulation as an adjunct to fetal testing. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol 7: 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsdorp VHM, van Vugt JMG, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Mentenegro N, Todros T (1994) Clinical significance of absent and reversed enddiastolic flow velocity waveforms in umbilicalartery. Lancet 344: 1664–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keirse MJNC (1989) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 477–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd LC, Patel NB, Smith R (1985) Non-stress antenatal cardiotocography — a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 1156–1159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kjos SL, Leung A, Henry OA, Victor MR, Paul RH, Medearis AL (1995) Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies. Predictors of fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 1532–1539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kol S, Thaler I, Paz N, Shmueli O (1995) Interpretation of nonstress tests by an artificial neural network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172: 1372–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT (2005) The use of fetal Doppler cerebro-placental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of postdated pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 84: 844–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lumley J, Lester A, Anderson I, Renou P, Wood C (1983) A randomized trial of weekly cardiotocography in high-risk obstetric patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90: 1028–1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning FA, Harman C, Menticoglou S (1996) Fetal biophysical score and cerebral palsy at age 3 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 319

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning FA, Morrison I, Harmann CR, Lange IR, Menticoglou S (1987) Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: Experience in 19.221 referred high risk pregnancies. 2. An analysis of false negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 880–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura M, Murata Y, Hirano T, Nagatti N, Doi S, Suda K (1996) The effects of developing autonomous nervous system on FHR variabilities determined by the power spectral analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 380

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna D, Tharmaratnam S, Mahsud S, Dornan J (2005) Ultrasonic evidence of placental calcification at 36 weeks’ gestation: maternal and fetal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 84: 7–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meis PJ, Ureda JR, Swain M, Kelly RT, Penry M, Sharp P (1986) Variable decelerations during nonstress tests are not a sign of fetal compromise. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 586–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH (1996) The modified biophysical profile: antepartum testing in the 1990s. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 812–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohide P, Keirse MJNC (1991) Biophysical assessment of well-being. In: Chambers I, Erkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol I. Pregnancy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore TR (1990) Superiority of the four-quadrant sum over the single-deepest-pockettechnique in ultrasonographic identification of abnormal amniotic fluid volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163: 762–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers RE, Mueller-Heubach E, Adamsons K (1973) Predictability of the state of fetal oxygenation from quantitative analysis of the components of late deceleration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 115: 1083–1094

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nageotte JP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK (1994) Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile score. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170: 1672–1676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK (1996) Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 334: 613–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HFR, Martin CB jr, Bots RSGM (1982) Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum Dev 6: 177–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen AG, Svare JA (2004) Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 83: 818–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhof H, an der Stege JG, Lander M, Prechtl HFR, Aarnoudse JG (1993) Urine production rate is related to behavioural states in the near term fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100: 920–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick J, Campbell K, Carmichael L, Natale R, Richardson B (1980) Patterns of human fetal breathing during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 56: 24–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattinson RC, Norman K, Odendaal HJ (1994) The role of Doppler veloci-metry in the management of high risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 114–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai M, James D (1990) The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 76: 812–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt LD, Paul RH, Phelan J, Walla Ca, Broussard P (1987) Fifteen years of experience with antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 1509–1515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porst S(1986) Zur Geschichte der fetalen Herztonaufzeichnung in Deutschland. In: Bech L (Hrsg) Zur Geschichte der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, pp 119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Proud J, Grant AM (1987) Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal well being. Br Med J 294: 1641–1647

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queenan JT, Gadow EC (1970) Polyhydramnios: chronic versus acute. Am J Obstet Gynecol 108: 349–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray M, Freeman R, Pine S, Hesselgesser R (1972). Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riehn A, Sarembe B, Riehn F, Szendzielarz D (1990) Diefetale Herzfrequenzüberwachung bei der stehenden Schwangeren. Zentralbl Gynäkol 112: 1519–1523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HP, Shaw-Dunn J (1973) Fetal heart rates as determined by sonar in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 80: 805–809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochard F, Schifrin BS, Goupil F, Legrand H, Blottiere J, Sureau C, (1976) Nonstressed fetal heart rate monitoring in the antenatal period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126: 699–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R (1987) FIGO News: guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 25: 159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen KG, Amer-Wahlin I, Luzietti R, Noren H (2004) Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 18: 485–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rüttgers H (1989) Kardiotokographie. Standards in der Perinatalmedizin. Perinat Med 1: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadovski E, Yaffe H (1973) Daily fetal movement recording and fetal prognosis. Obstet Gynecol 41: 845–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W, Gnirs J (1990) Fetale Bewegungsaktivität und akustische Stimulation. Gynäkologe 23: 289–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, KTM (1993a) IUGR-Probleme der Diagnostik. In: Schmidt, W (Hrsg) Jahrbuch der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe 1992/93. Biermann, Zülpich, S113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (1993b) Bedeutung der intrapartalen Asphyxie für die Entstehung von kindlichen Hirnschäden. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 53: 369–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM (1997) Standards in der Perinatalmedizin — Doppler-Sonographie in der Schwangerschaft. Frauenarzt 38: 452–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Huch R, Huch A (1985) Premature contractions: are they caused by maternal standing? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34: 175–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Deckardt R, Graeff H, Huch A, Huch R (1987) Ist mütterliches Stehen ein physiologischer fetaler Streßtest? Arch Gynecol Obstet 242: 733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Bung P, Weber St, Huch A, Huch R (1993) An orthostatic uterovascular syndrome — a prospective, longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169: 183–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Kaisenberg C von, Holzgreve W (Hrsg) (1994) Manual der fetalen Medizin mit Referenzwerten für den klinischen Anwender. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM et al. (2004) Anwendung des CTG während der Schwanger-schaft und Geburt. Frauenarzt 45: 979–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer DM, Spong CY, Ghidini A, Salafia CM, Minior RK (1996) In preterm fetuses decreased amniotic fluid is associated with decreased fetal movements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 344

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH (1986) Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the non-stress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 131–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spätling L, Fallenstein F, Danders R, Hasenberg A (1994) External four-channel tocography during delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 46: 291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinillo A, Montanari L, Bergante C, Gaia G, Chiara A, Fazzi E (2005) Prognosticvalue of umbilical artey Doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 105: 613–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staisch KJ, Westlake JR, Bashore RA (1980) Blind oxytocin challenge test and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138: 399–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stembera ZK (1969) Fetal tolerance to maternal exercise hypoxia, perinatal factors affecting human development. Pan American Health Organization, Sci Publ 186

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannirandorn Y, Kittipibul V (2001) Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being. J Med Assoc Thai 84: 520–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker SB, Berkelman RL (1986) Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected fetal surveillance techniques. Obstet Gynecol Surv41: 121–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M (2004) GRIT study group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364: 513–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todd AL, Tridinger BJ, Cole MJ, Cooney GH (1992) Antenatal tests of fetal welfare and development at age 2 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167: 66–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulbricht C, Dorffner G, Lee A (1998) Neural networks for recognizing patterns in cardiotocograms. Artif Intell Med 12: 271–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas OAC, Arulkumuran S, Gibb DMF, Ratnam SS (1984) Nipple stimulation in late pregnancy causing uterine hyperstimulation and profound fetal bradycardia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91: 364–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber S, Schneider KTM, Bung P, Huch A, Huch R (1988) Antenatalefetale Herzfrequenz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der mütterlichen Körperhaltung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 48: 35–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner Z, Divon MY, Katz N, Minior VK, Nasseri A, Girz B (1996) Multivariant analysis of antepartum fetal test in predicting neonatal outcome of growth retarded fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174: 338

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams KP, Farquharson DF, Bebbington M, Dansereau J, Galerneau F, Wilson RD, Shaw D, Kent N (2003) Screening forfetal well-being in a high-risk pregnant population comparing the nonstress test with umbilical artey Doppler velocimetry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 1366–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn V (1984) Uterine contractions during pregnancy. J Perinat Med 56: 36–40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinikum rechts der Isar, Abt. für Perinatalmedizin, Frauenklinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München

    K. T. M. Schneider (Prof. Dr. Med.)

  2. Frauenklinik, Klinikum München-Pasing, Steinerweg 5, D-81241, München

    J. Gnirs (Prof. Dr. med.)

Authors
  1. K. T. M. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Gnirs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsfrauenklinik, Inselspital Bern, Ahornweg 4, 3122, Kehrsatz, Schweiz

    Henning Schneider (Ehem. Direktor) (Ehem. Direktor)

  2. Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich

    Peter Husslein

  3. Abteilung für Perinatalmedizin Frauenklinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Universität der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München

    Karl-Theo M. Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, K.T.M., Gnirs, J. (2006). Antepartale Überwachung. In: Schneider, H., Husslein, P., Schneider, KT.M. (eds) Die Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33897-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33897-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33896-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33897-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation