Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistik und ihre Anwendungen ((STATIST))

  • 1593 Accesses

Auszug

In der genetischen Beratung fragen Mitglieder aus Familien nach dem Risiko füur das Auftreten einer Krankheit bei sich selbst oder bei zukünftigen Kindern, wenn in ihren Familien eine genetisch bedingte Krankheit vermutet wird. Falls bei einfachen monogenen Krankheiten eine Mutation im verantwortlichen Gen direkt nachgewiesen werden kann und aus dieser Mutation auch der Ausbruch der Krankheit folgt (vollständige Penetranz), sind klare Aussagen für jedes getestete Familienmitglied möglich. Bei unvollständiger Penetranz oder wenn keine molekulargenetische Untersuchung durchgeführt wurde, kann man nur eine unsichere Aussage in Form einer Krankheitswahrscheinlichkeit machen. Die Bestimmung dieser Wahrscheinlichkeit wird als Teil der genetischen Beratung aufgefasst (s. Exkurs 6, S. 293). In einfachen Situationen genügen Grundkenntnisse der Humangenetik zur Quantifizierung der Krankheitswahrscheinlichkeit. Schon bei wenigen verkomplizierenden Faktoren für monogene Krankheiten erfordern die Risikoschätzungen in der Regel umfangreiche Berechnungen. Dies ist der Fall, wenn

  • Ratsuchende mit den Kranken weitläufiger verwandt sind

  • Informationen über genetische Marker oder diagnostische Tests einbezogen werden müssen

  • Abweichungen vom klassischen Mendelschen Modell (s. Abschnitt 1.3.2) vorliegen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6.7 Literatur

Bücher

  • Harper PS (2004) Practical Genetic Counseling, 6. Ausgabe Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariverdian G, Buselmaier W (2004) Humangenetik 3. Auflage. Springer Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel F, Fuhrmann W (1975) Genetische Familienberatung. Springer: Berlin Heidelbeg New York

    Google Scholar 

Artikel

  • Amir E, Evans DG, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Moran A, Boggis C, Wilson M, Howell A (2003) Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme. Journal of Medical Genetics 40:807–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Durocher F, Smith P, Simard J, Easton DF (2005) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BOADICEA and BRCAPRO models and penetrance estimation in high-risk French-Canadian families. Breast Cancer Research 8:R3

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Easton DF (2006) Risk prediction models for familial breast cancer. Future Oncol 2:257–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Gayther SA, Stratton JF, Ponder BA, Easton DF (2000) Risk models for familial ovarian and breast cancer. Genetic Epidemiology 18:173–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, McMullan G, Day NE, Ponder BA, Easton D (2001) Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study. Genetic Epidemiology 21:1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, McMullan G, Day NE, Stratton MR, Peto J, Ponder BJ, Easton DF (2002) A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes. British Journal of Cancer 86:76–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou AC, Pharoah PP, Smith P, Easton DF (2004) The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. British Journal of Cancer 91:1580–1590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker E, Veenema H, Den Dunnen JT, van Broeckhoven C, Grootscholten PM, Bonten EJ, van Ommen GJ, Pearson PL (1989) Germinal mosaicism increases the recurrence risk for ‘new’ Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations. Journal of Medical Genetics 26:553–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbujani G, Russo A, Danieli GA, Spiegler AW, Borkowska J, Petrusewicz IH (1990) Segregation analysis of 1885 DMD families: significant departure from the expected proportion of sporadic cases. Human Genetics 84:522–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barcenas CH, Hosain GM, Arun B, Zong J, Zhou X, Chen J, Cortada JM, Mills GB, Tomlinson GE, Miller AR, Strong LC, Amos CI (2006) Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families. J Clin Oncol 24:354–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becher H, Chang-Claude J (1996) Estimating disease risks for individuals with a given family history in different populations with an application to breast cancer. Genetic Epidemiology 13:229–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellhouse DR (2004) The Reverent Thomas Bayes, FRS: A bibliography to celebrate the tercenttenry of his birth. Statistical Science 19:3–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry DA, Iversen ES, Jr., Gudbjartsson DF, Hiller EH, Garber JE, Peshkin BN, Lerman C, Watson P, Lynch HT, Hilsenbeck SG, Rubinstein WS, Hughes KS, Parmigiani G (2002) BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20:2701–2712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry DA, Parmigiani G, Sanchez J, Schildkraut J, Winer E (1997) Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 89:227–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Claude J, Becher H, Hamann U, Schroeder-Kurth T (1995) Risk assessment for familial occurrence of breast cancer. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie 117:423–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Wang W, Broman KW, Katki HA, Parmigiani G (2004) BayesMendel: an R environment for Mendelian risk prediction. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3:Article21

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1991) Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. American Journal of Human Genetics 48:232–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD (1994) Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73:643–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop DT (1995) Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. American Journal of Human Genetics 56:265–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emery AE (2002) The muscular dystrophies. Lancet 359:687–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DG, Eccles DM, Rahman N, Young K, Bulman M, Amir E, Shenton A, Howell A, Lalloo F (2004) A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO. Journal of Medical Genetics 41:474–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer C, Gross W, Kruger J, Cremer M, Vogel F, Grimm T (2006) Modelling germline mosaicism and different new mutation rates simultaneously for appropriate risk calculations in families with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Hum Genet 70:237–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, Hulick M, Ward BE, Lingenfelter B, Gumpper KL, Scholl T, Tavtigian SV, Pruss DR, Critchfield GC (2002) Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20:1480–1490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81:1879–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1949) The rate of mutation of human genes. Hereditas (Suppl) 35:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1956) Mutation in the sex-linked recessive type of muscular dystrophy; a possible sex difference. Annals of Human Genetics 20:344–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James PA, Doherty R, Harris M, Mukesh BN, Milner A, Young MA, Scott C (2006) Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24:707–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen B, Hartmann C, Scholz V, Jauch A, Zschocke J (2005) MLPA analysis for the detection of deletions, duplications and complex rearrangements in the dystrophin gene: potential and pitfalls. Neurogenetics 6:29–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Emery AEH, Spiegler AWJ, Apacik C, Müller CR. Grimm T (1996) Age effects on serum creatinin kinase (SCK) levels in obligate carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) and its implication on genetic counselling. Acta Cardiomiologica 8:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302:643–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M (1988) Programs for Pedigree Analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE. Genetic Epidemiology 5:471–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop GM, Lalouel JM (1984) Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. American Journal of Human Genetics 36:460–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marroni F, Aretini P, D’Andrea E, Caligo MA, Cortesi L, Viel A, Ricevuto E, Montagna M, Cipollini G, Ferrari S, Santarosa M, Bisegna R, Bailey-Wilson JE, Bevilacqua G, Parmigiani G, Presciuttini S (2004) Evaluation of widely used models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Journal of Medical Genetics 41:278–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding W, Bell R, Rosenthal J, Hussey C, Tran T, McClure M, Frye C, Hattier T, Phelps R, Haugen-Strano A, Katcher H, Yakumo K, Gholami Z, Shaffer D, Stone S, Bayer S, Wray C. Bogden R, Dayananth P, Ward J, Tonin P, Narod S, Bristow PK, Norris FH, Helvering L, Morrison P, Rosteck P, Lai M, Barrett JC, Lewis C, Neuhausen S, Cannon-Albright L, Goldgar D, Wiseman R, Kamb A, Skolnick MH. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994; 266: 66–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narod SA, Goldgar D, Cannon-Albright L, Weber B, Moslehi R, Ives E, Lenoir G, Lynch H (1995) Risk modifiers in carriers of BRCA1 mutations. Int J Cancer 64:394–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. American Journal of Human Genetics 62:145–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani G, Berry D, Aguilar O (1998) Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. American Journal of Human Genetics 62:145–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickle LW, Johnson KA (1989) Estimating the long-term probability of developing breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81:1854–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reif M, Baitsch H (1985) Psychological issues in genetic counselling. Human Genetics 70:193–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutzler R, Schlegelberger B, Meindl A, Gerber WD, Kiechle M (2003) Counselling, genetic testing and prevention in women with hereditary breast-and ovarian cancer. Interdisciplinary recommendations of the consortium „Hereditary Breast-and Ovarian Cancer“ of the German Cancer AiD. Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie 125:494–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Statistics in Medicine 23:1111–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore AS, Gong G, Itnyre J (1997) Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 60:496–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, Collins N, Gregory S, Gumbs C, Micklem G (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Webseiten

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Risikoberechnungen in Familien. In: Einführung in die Genetische Epidemiologie. Statistik und ihre Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33568-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33568-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25616-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33568-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics