Topological Global Localization for Subterranean Voids

  • David Silver
  • Joseph Carsten
  • Scott Thayer
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 25)


The need for reliable maps of subterranean spaces too hazardous for humans to occupy has motivated the development of robotic mapping tools. For such systems to be fully autonomous, they must be able to deal with all varieties of subterranean environments, including those containing loops. This paper presents an approach for an autonomous mobile robot to determine if the area currently being explored has been previously visited. Combined with other techniques in topological mapping, this approach will allow for the fully autonomous general exploration of subterranean spaces. Data collected from a research coal mine is used to experimentally verify our approach.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Agresti. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Baker, A. Morris, D. Ferguson, S. Thayer, C. Whittaker, Z. Omohundro, C. Reverte, W. Whittaker, D. Hähnel, and S. Thrun. A Campaign in Autonomous Mine Mapping. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, LA, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Belwood and R. Waugh. Bats and mines: Abandoned does not always mean empty. Bats, 9(3), 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.J. Besl and N.D. McKay. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 14(2):239–256, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Chetverikov, D. Svirko, D. Stepanov, and P. Krsek. The trimmed iterative closest point algorithm. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Choset and J. Burdick. Sensor based planning, part II: Incremental construction of the generalized voronoi graph. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1643–1648, Nagoya, Japan, May 1995. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Choset and K. Nagatani. Topological simultaneous localization and mapping (slam): towards exact localization without explicit localization. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(2):125–137, Apr. 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Dudek, P. Freedman, and S. Hadjres. Using local information in a non-local way for mapping graph-like worlds. In Proc. of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Dudek, M. Jenkin, E. Milios, and D. Wilkes. Robotic exploration as graph construction. Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 7(6):859–865, Dec. 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Duff, J. Roberts, and P. Corke. Automation of an underground mining vehicle using reactive navigation and opportunistic localization. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Kuipers, J. Modayil, P. Beeson, M. MacMahon, and F. Savelli. Local metrical and global topological maps in the hybrid spatial semantic hierarchy. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Lisien, D. Morales, D. Silver, G. Kantor, I. Rekleitis, and H. Choset. Hierarchical simultaneous localization and mapping. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, volume 1, pages 448–453, Oct. 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Morris, D. Silver, D. Ferguson, and S. Thayer. Towards topological exploration of abandoned mines. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Rossignac and P. Borrel. Multi-Resolution 3D Approximations for Rendering Complex Scenes., pages 455–465. Springer-Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Silver, D. Ferguson, A. Morris, and S. Thayer. Feature extraction for topological mine maps. In IEEE/RSJ Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Tomatis, I. Nourbakhsh, and R. Siegwart. Hybrid simultaneous localization and map building: Closing the loop with multi-hypotheses tracking. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Silver
    • 1
  • Joseph Carsten
    • 1
  • Scott Thayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Robotics InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations