Abstract
Although PLS is a well established tool to estimate structural equation models, more work is still needed in order to better understand its relative merits when compared to likelihood methods. This paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of PLS and likelihood estimators’ properties, through the comparison and evaluation of these estimation methods for structural equation models based on customer satisfaction data. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to compare the two estimation methods. The model used in the simulation is the ECSI (European Customer Satisfaction Index) model, constituted by 6 latent variables (image, expectations, perceived quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty). The simulation is conducted in the context of symmetric and skewed response data and formative blocks, which constitute the typical framework of customer satisfaction measurement. In the simulation we analyze the ability of each method to adequately estimate the inner model coefficients and the indicator loadings. The estimators are analyzed both in terms of bias and precision. Results have shown that globally PLS estimates are generally better than covariance-based estimates both in terms of bias and precision. This is particularly true when estimating the model with skewed response data or a formative block, since for the model based on symmetric data the two methods have shown a similar performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. (2000). On measurement of intangibles assets: a study of robustness of partial least squares. Total Quality Management, 7, 897–907.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research, Chap.10. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dijkstra, T. (1983). Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 67–90.
ECSI: European Customer Satisfaction Index. (1998). Report prepared for the ECSI Steering Committee.
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56, 6–21.
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). The two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to customer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.
Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advanced methods of marketing research. MA, Cambridge: Blackwell.
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Everitt Bryant, B. (1998). The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7–18.
Hulland, J. (1998). Use of partial least squares in strategic management research. Comportamento Organizacional e Gesto, 4(1), 181–202.
Lomöller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable path modelling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Physica.
Mcdonald, R. P. (1996). Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(2), 239–270.
Ridgon, R. E. (1998). Structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. MahWah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schneeweiss, H. (1990). Models with latent variables: LISREL versus PLS. Contempororary Mathematics, 112, 33–40.
Tenenhaus, M. (1999). Lapproche PLS. Revue de Statistique Applique, 47(2), 5–40.
Tenenhaus, M. (2003). Comparison between PLS and LISREL approaches for structural equation models. In Vilares, Tenenhaus, Coelho Vinzi, Morinau (Eds.), PLS and related methods. Proceedings of the PLS03 International Conference.
Vilares, M. J., & Coelho, P. S. (2005). A Satisfação e a Lealdade do Cliente - Metodologias de Avaliação, Gestão e Análise. Escolar Editora.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vilares, M.J., Almeida, M.H., Coelho, P.S. (2010). Comparison of Likelihood and PLS Estimators for Structural Equation Modeling: A Simulation with Customer Satisfaction Data. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32825-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32827-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)