Skip to main content

From KISS to KIDS – An ‘Anti-simplistic’ Modelling Approach

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent and Multi-Agent-Based Simulation (MABS 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3415))

Abstract

A new approach is suggested under the slogan “Keep it Descriptive Stupid” (KIDS) that encapsulates a trend in increasingly descriptive agent-based social simulation. The KIDS approach entails one starts with the simulation model that relates to the target phenomena in the most straight-forward way possible, taking into account the widest possible range of evidence, including anecdotal accounts and expert opinion. Simplification is only applied if and when the model and evidence justify this. This contrasts sharply with the KISS approach where one starts with the simplest possible model and only moves to a more complex one if forced to. An example multi-agent simulation of domestic water demand and social influence is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axtell, R., et al.: Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 1, 123–141 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barreteau, O., et al.: Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4(2) (2001), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/5.html

  3. Barthelemy, O.: The impact of the model structure in social simulations. In: 1st International Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, Gronigen, the Netherlands (September 2003), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep121.html

  4. Chattoe, E.: Building Empirically Plausible Multi-Agent Systems: A Case Study of Innovation Diffusion. In: Dautenhahn, K., et al. (eds.) Socially Intelligent Agents – creating relationships with computers and robots. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Downing, T.E., et al.: Climate Change and the Demand for Water, Research Report, Stockholm Environment Institute Oxford Office (2003), http://www.sei.se/oxford/ccdew

  6. Edmonds, B.: Syntactic Measures of Complexity. Doctoral Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (1999), http://bruce.edmonds.name/thesis

  7. Edmonds, B.: Complexity and Scientific Modelling. Foundations of Science 5, 379–390 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Edmonds, B.: The Purpose and Place of Formal Systems in the Development of Science, CPM Report 00-75 (2000), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep75.html

  9. Edmonds, B.: The Use of Models - making MABS actually work. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 15–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmonds, B.: Simplicity is Not Truth-Indicative. CPM Report 02-99 (2002), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep99.html

  11. Edmonds, B.: Simulation and Complexity - how they can relate. In: Feldmann, V., Mühlfeld, K. (eds.) Virtual Worlds of Precision. Lit Verlag (in press), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep118.html

  12. Edmonds, B., Bryson, J.: The Insufficiency of Formal Design Methods – the necessity of an experimental approach for the understanding and control of complex MAS. In: Jennings, N.R., et al. (eds.) AAMAS 2004, pp. 938–945. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edmonds, B., Hales, D.: Computational Simulation as Theoretical Experiment, CPM report 03-106 (submitted to the Journal of Mathematical Sociology) (2003), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep106.html

  14. Edmonds, B., Hales, D.: Replication, Replication and Replication - some hard lessons from model alignment. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6(4) (2003), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/4/11.html

  15. Etienne, M., Le Page, C., Cohen, M.: A Step-by-step Approach to Building Land Management Scenarios Based on Multiple Viewpoints on Multi-agent System Simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6(2) (2003), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/2.html

  16. Giere, R.N.: Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Granovetter, M.: Economic-Action and Social-Structure – The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moss, S.: Critical Incident Management: An Empirically Derived Computational Model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(4) (1998), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk /1/4/1.html

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moss, S.: Policy Analysis from First Principles. Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences 99, 7267–7274 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross-Validation. American Journal of Sociology (accepted); Earlier version is CPM report 03-105, http://cfpm.org/cpmrep105.html

  21. Pohill, J.G., Izquierdo, L.R., Gotts, N.M.: The Ghost in the Model (and other effects of floating point arithmetic). In: 1st International Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, Gronigen, the Netherlands (September 2003), http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~kgt/ESSA/ESSA1/Polhill-Izquierdo-Gotts.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rouchier, J.: Interaction Routines and Selfish Behaviours in an Artificial Market – Transferring field observations of a wholesale fruits and vegetables market into a multiagent model. CPM Report No.: CPM-04-130 (2004), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep130.html

  23. Suppes, P.: Models of Data Logic. In: Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) Methodology and the Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pp. 252–261. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, R.: Agent-Based Modelling Incorporating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Case Study Investigating the Impact of E-commerce upon the Value Chain. In: 1st International Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, Gronigen, the Netherlands (September 2003), http://cfpm.org/cpmrep123.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Edmonds, B., Moss, S. (2005). From KISS to KIDS – An ‘Anti-simplistic’ Modelling Approach . In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds) Multi-Agent and Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32243-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32243-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25262-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32243-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics